arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Hannane Yaghoubizade

Publications and source records attributed to Hannane Yaghoubizade.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

A Simplified Analysis of the Good-Bad $3/2$-Approximation Algorithm for Some Minimum-Cost Graph Problems

In this paper, we consider an easy greedy approximation algorithm, the good-bad algorithm, introduced by Couëtoux for finding a minimum-cost set of edges such that every connected component has at least $k$ vertices. Couëtoux proves that the good-bad algorithm achieves a $3/2$-approximation for this problem. Davis and Williamson extend this result to the more general problem of finding a minimum-cost edge set that contains at least one edge from every cut $S\subseteq V$ satisfying $h(S) = 1$ where $h:2^V \rightarrow \{0,1\}$ is downward monotone; that is, $h(S) = 1$ implies $h(T) = 1$ for every nonempty subset $T \subseteq S$. The original problem corresponds to $h(S) =1$ when $|S|<k$. We give a simplified analysis of the good-bad algorithm for downward monotone functions.

cs.DS

Approval-Based Apportionment: Like Portioning, Approximately like Committee Voting

We study approval-based apportionment, a variant of committee elections in which candidates ("parties") can be selected several times. We show that the proportionality axioms EJR, EJR+, and FJR coincide, and so do PJR, PJR+, and FPJR; that Lindahl priceability, an axiom implying core stability, is equivalent to a notion of approximate optimality with respect to the proportional approval voting (PAV) score; and that locally PAV-optimal committees are priceable. Approval-based apportionment (where a candidate receives an integer number of seats) lies between committee elections (zero or one seat) and portioning (a fractional number of seats). We formally connect portioning and apportionment by giving a construction that lifts axioms from apportionment to portioning and preserves implications between them. Several of our new implications between apportionment axioms are natural from a portioning perspective, leading us to believe that apportionment sits closer to portioning than to committee elections. None of them holds in committee elections, but several extend approximately, which makes apportionment a fruitful setting for conjecturing approximate relationships in approval-based committee elections.

cs.GT