arXiv subjects

Han Zi

Publications and source records attributed to Han Zi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Pragmatic Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities of Implicit Context in Large Language Models

In the era of large language models (LLMs), attackers often manipulate natural language to elicit unsafe or harmful outputs, creating a new natural language attack surface unique to LLM-based systems, where attacks directly exploit explicit linguistic cues in user prompts to bypass the safety mechanism of LLMs. However, such attacks can often be mitigated by existing safety alignment algorithms. On the other hand, human language is inherently grounded in pragmatics, necessitating typical context to interpret language, e.g., world knowledge, social norms. However, such contexts are often implicit because they are not directly expressed in human language and are not sufficiently leveraged in safety alignment, creating a fundamental mismatch between human language interpretation and safety alignment approaches. In this paper, we demonstrate that this mismatch exposes vulnerabilities in LLMs. We refer to this vulnerability as the pragmatic attack surface, which can be exploited to achieve high attack success rates. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms baseline attack methods across various open-source and closed-source models by a substantial margin.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Learning to Diagnose and Correct Moral Errors: Beyond Shallow Heuristics in Moral Alignment

Existing approaches to moral value alignment are primarily set out to align LLMs' generation with the distributions of morally appropriate language, which has seen good progress. However, these approaches are often brittle, heavily rely on shallow heuristics, and reduce performance in out-of-the-distribution tasks. In other words, the learning paradigm underlying existing approaches teaches LLMs what morally (in)appropriate language looks like, but not why it is morally (in)appropriate. In this paper, we address this challenge by developing pragmatic inference-driven methods to facilitate LLMs' learning of how to diagnose and correct moral errors, thereby enabling them to generate morally appropriate language. Pragmatic inference is the reasoning process of deriving (implied) meanings -- a famous concept in linguistics. Our methods vary the inference procedures by the inferential load of different moral discourses, rather than modelling their diverse and complex semantic distributions separately. Empirical results demonstrate that our approach improves moral value alignment in LLMs and generalizes effectively across tasks.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

From Training to Generalization: Improving Moral Reasoning Through Pragmatic Inference

Although moral reasoning has emerged as a promising research direction for large language models (LLMs), a persistent generalization challenge remains: LLMs often achieve strong performance on training data but struggle to generalize their moral reasoning to unseen test data. From a linguistic perspective, moral reasoning is a pragmatic process in which moral judgments are inferred based on the context of social norms underlying a given moral situation. However, existing approaches overlook this pragmatic nature because of two major bottlenecks: (1) LLMs are primarily skilled in capturing distributional semantics, which differs from the pragmatic nature of moral reasoning; (2) there is currently no effective solution for grounding language in the moral context. In this paper, we develop a pragmatic inference approach that enables LLMs to infer moral judgments for a given moral situation by combining metapragmatic links with Moral Foundations Theory. Specifically, metapragmatic links serve to bridge the gap between distributional semantics and pragmatics, whereas Moral Foundations Theory provides a principled basis for grounding language in moral contexts. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach substantially improves LLMs' generalization in moral reasoning, highlighting the potential of pragmatic inference for future moral reasoning research.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Diagnosing the Performance Trade-off in Moral Alignment: A Case Study on Gender Stereotypes

Moral alignment has emerged as a widely adopted approach for regulating the behavior of pretrained language models (PLMs), typically through fine-tuning on curated datasets. Gender stereotype mitigation is a representational task within the broader application of moral alignment. However, this process often comes at the cost of degraded downstream task performance. Prior studies commonly aim to achieve a performance trade-off by encouraging PLMs to selectively forget only stereotypical knowledge through carefully designed fairness objective, while preserving their language modeling capability (overall forgetting). In this short paper, we investigate whether the performance trade-off can be achieved through the lens of forgetting and the fairness objective. Our analysis shows that the large datasets needed for satisfactory fairness highlight the limitations of current fairness objectives in achieving an effective trade-off: (1) downstream task performance is strongly correlated with overall forgetting; (2) selective forgetting reduces stereotypes, but overall forgetting increases. and (3) general solutions for alleviating forgetting are ineffective at reducing the overall forgetting and fail to improve downstream task performance.

cs.CL↗