arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Han Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Han Chen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

Preserving rare-item recall under a storage budget: quantization, distillation, and the limits of teacher fidelity

Under a fixed embedding-storage budget, recommenders can use a small full-precision model, a distilled student, or a higher-rank low-precision model. We asked which choice preserves rare-item recall and whether teacher fidelity reflects it in seven dataset-backbone cells: matrix factorization on Gowalla, Last.fm, Amazon Video Games, Steam, Goodbooks-10k and MovieLens-20M, and LightGCN on Amazon Video Games. Seven candidates fit in 168 bytes per user or item row: 40-dimensional Bayesian personalized ranking (BPR), two 40-dimensional unbiased knowledge distillation (UnKD) students, and factorizations of a 300-dimensional teacher's scores at ranks 40, 80, 155 and 300, stored in 32, 16, 8 and 4 bits. Each test set was evaluated once after fixing candidates and confirmatory analyses. The rank-300 4-bit factorization used 13% of teacher storage and retained 95-103% of its tail recall@20 and 93-97% of its NDCG@20 in every cell. The rank-40 factorization had the lowest tail recall in every cell; the 4-bit factorization had 1.2-12.7 times its tail recall and 0.99-1.46 times its NDCG. UnKD students retained 56-102% of teacher tail recall. In all ten prespecified comparisons across five prospective-expansion cells, the 4-bit factorization had higher tail recall, with simultaneous 95% intervals excluding zero. Teacher-hit retention, the share of the teacher's relevant tail hits also found by a model, ordered 23 of 147 candidate pairs differently from tail recall and identified the wrong tail-recall leader in 3 of 7 cells: models can find relevant tail items the teacher misses. In these cells, spending bytes on rank rather than precision preserved rare-item recall at 7.5 times the arithmetic per score. Compressed recommenders should be judged by total tail recall, not teacher fidelity alone.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

VLA-Retain: Benchmarking Cross-Dimension Effects of Vision Tuning in VLAs

Vision-language-action (VLA) models transfer knowledge from large-scale pretraining into robot control, but their manipulation performance remains sensitive to changes in observation conditions, which recent work addresses by fine-tuning the visual module on target-domain data. However, it remains unclear how such adaptation affects robustness beyond the target condition, as existing robustness benchmarks only evaluate models without fine-tuning and adaptation studies only report the target gain. Measuring this cross-dimension effect requires separating target gains from off-target changes, isolating adaptation effects from architectural differences, ruling out generic forgetting, and comparing tuning choices. Therefore, we introduce VLA-Retain, a benchmark that compares five open VLA models, tuned on Camera-view or Sensor-noise data, with their own base checkpoints on LIBERO-Plus dataset spanning seven perturbation dimensions. Our study reveals four findings. First, targeted vision tuning is not local, and its target gain does not predict retention. Mean off-target gain is negative in 8 of 10 model--domain configurations. Under Camera-view tuning, X-VLA gains $69.4$ percentage points on the target but loses $4.6$ points on average elsewhere, whereas OpenVLA-OFT gains $39.3$ and $1.4$ points, respectively. Second, these regressions are not explained only by performance loss on the same tasks without perturbations. Third, broader training coverage raises overall gain over target-specific training but does not eliminate dimension-level regressions. Fourth, tuning strategies are model-dependent, as DELTA-style feature preservation raises X-VLA's mean off-target gain to $+1.2$ points but lowers OpenVLA-OFT's to $-23.1$. Overall, these findings show that target-domain success alone is insufficient and highlight cross-dimensional retention as a key criterion for targeted VLA adaptation.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

MemDerive: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Agent Memory over Evolving Data

Long-running agents rely on memory of their past interactions for task state, such as what has been completed and which conditions still hold. Such state is usually a derived state. No record states it, and it must be computed by rules from multiple records of an evolving history. Existing memory benchmarks score only the final answer, with no reference for the intermediate states behind it. A wrong answer therefore cannot be traced to the state that was missed, and a state that silently became outdated goes undetected. We present MemDerive, a diagnostic benchmark for agent memory over evolving data. It specifies each scenario symbolically, derives exact gold answers with Datalog, records the gold derivation DAG and the supporting events of every query, and renders the history in natural language with fictional entities and distractors. Its 10 scenarios contain 4,692 events and 1,503 queries whose difficulty varies along access, evolution, and composition. On this ground truth, MemDerive evaluates answer reliability, diagnoses failures by probing the nodes of the gold derivation DAG, and tracks whether answers stay correct as events arrive. Our evaluation of four memory systems reveals failures that final-answer benchmarks hide. On derived state, every memory system falls behind simple BM25 retrieval, although the same answer model reaches 96.01% when given the supporting events. Most failures are ungathered, as a system holds the missing intermediate state but does not retrieve it for the question that needs it. Memory systems also rarely propagate implicit changes, which no new record states. These results suggest three principles for memory design. Gather inputs along the derivation, store rules with their versions, and maintain derived states through recorded dependencies.

cs.DB↗
arXiv2026

Candidate-dependent residual routing trades top-of-list accuracy for recall in sequential recommendation

Candidate-dependent routing lets a sequential recommender weight a user's past behaviors differently for each item it scores. We test whether this flexibility helps by adding a small residual routing module to a self-attentive baseline, in two versions that differ only in what sets the routing weights: the user's history representation or the candidate item's embedding. Across five paired seeds on the REES46 cosmetics-shop dataset, with matched training for all three models, candidate-dependent routing leaves the primary metric, normalized discounted cumulative gain at cutoff ten (NDCG@10), essentially unchanged (mean relative change +0.003%). Secondary and exploratory analyses show that this flat average hides two effects that cancel. The candidate-dependent model places more relevant items in its top ten (recall +1.81%) but ranks the first one lower (mean reciprocal rank -1.09%), and most of its new hits land at positions six to ten. Its gains come from queries with at least one target among the user's last 50 events, while queries whose targets all lie outside that window get worse. In this form, candidate-dependent routing trades accuracy at the top of the list for recall further down.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

OpenMobile-2: Building Versatile Mobile Agents with Scalable Environments and App-Native Tools

We introduce OpenMobile-2, a near-frontier mobile agent with fully open training environments and recipes. We make three key advances: (1) Diverse environments with simulated commercial apps: We build MobileGym++, featuring 35 realistic, functionally rich commercial-style apps with cross-app workflows, while preserving full controllability for reset and verification. Together with newly configured apps in Android emulators, this yields a diverse playground spanning over 110 apps. (2) Open training data at scale: Building on this foundation, we curate nearly 12K mobile interaction trajectories for supervised fine-tuning and the largest open collection of verifiable RL training data for mobile agents, comprising over 2K executable tasks with automatic rewards. (3) Hybrid GUI and app-native tool use: We explore an experimental mobile-use setting where apps expose selected functionalities as app-native tools alongside their GUIs, allowing agents to interleave GUI actions and tool calls within a task. We implement this setting in MobileGym++ with over 300 carefully scoped tools across 50+ apps. Additionally, we introduce MobileGym++ Bench for complex, long-horizon commercial mobile scenarios, supporting both GUI-only and hybrid GUI-tool evaluation on a shared task suite. OpenMobile-2 performs competitively across established benchmarks, including AndroidWorld (79.9) and MobileWorld (50.4), while showing promising transfer to real-device mobile use, nearly doubling SPA-Bench performance from 31.9 to 59.6. All resources are available at https://os-copilot.github.io/OpenMobile2-Home/.

cs.SE↗
arXiv2026

Probability Contracts: Accuracy, Coherence, and Decisions Across LLM Interfaces

Equivalent probability requests can lead to different decisions even when both reports are valid. We introduce probability contracts, a benchmark that connects exact finite-world posteriors, validated event alignment, interface coherence, and failure-aware decision evaluation. Across four model-interface configurations on 1,000 worlds, Kev has lower aggregate canonical posterior error than Jev but larger complement and coarsening residuals; accuracy ordering varies by stratum. Jev's Event and Choice interfaces change the binary action on 32.8% of valid pairs at defer cost 0.10. Post-hoc analyses show that disagreement certifies only 11-52% of mean binary pair error and does not consistently outperform confidence for selection. An action-region characterization and a standard scoring-rule identity explain averaging's expected Brier guarantee relative to random interface selection, but not a decision-loss guarantee at each cost. The loss contrast takes both signs on a 99-cost grid for every configuration; small penalties where both policies beat deferral have pointwise intervals containing zero. Secondary checks specified before collection include a separate 400-root cohort, where Event/Choice effects remain configuration-dependent. A joint surface-order and answer-ID intervention shifts posttrained probabilities. Both bounded reasoning arms yield no valid probability reports, leaving their probability accuracy undefined. Probability contracts make these distinctions measurable by evaluating event semantics, posterior error, coverage, and decision cost together.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review

AI reviewers can assign different judgments to manuscripts that report the same science in different wording, potentially rewarding rhetorical optimization over scientific improvement. We formulate Rhetorical Robustness as the joint requirement of stability across content-preserving rewrites and discrimination across papers. We introduce RobustReview, a controlled full-manuscript benchmark with 1,260 manuscript versions, and evaluate 30 reviewer configurations. The benchmark reveals false robustness, where low rewrite sensitivity coincides with score collapse across papers, and shows that human alignment and rhetorical robustness rank reviewers differently. Moreover, the evaluated content-focused prompting protocol does not consistently improve robustness across backbones. Motivated by these findings, we introduce SciCore, a dual-branch reviewer that averages a full-manuscript judgment with a judgment based on an extracted, structured science core. This design combines manuscript-level assessment with a content-normalized view intended to reduce rhetorical sensitivity. In our primary GPT-5.5 comparison, SciCore achieves a leading joint stability-discrimination profile among the benchmarked reviewers while maintaining competitive human alignment. These results identify rhetorical robustness as a distinct evaluation target and demonstrate the potential of science-core review to improve it.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Do Evidence-Reading Diagnostics Improve Interface Selection in Small LLM Recommenders?

Behavioral tests measure how a language model reads evidence. We ask whether those measurements help choose a recommendation interface. We evaluate six small instruction-tuned checkpoints across four recommendation domains with chronological evaluation and 3,426 evaluation users. Each request ranks eight candidates. A baseline selector chooses among history-only prompting, prompting with collaborative evidence, and score fusion. It uses observable features and six stability prompts that vary wording and candidate order. An augmented selector adds features from six evidence-reading prompts that ask the model to compare support counts. An interface chosen once on development (validation) data for each domain and checkpoint scores 0.5524 NDCG@5, compared with 0.5447 for the baseline selector and 0.5428 for the augmented selector. Adding the diagnostic features changes NDCG@5 by -0.0019 (95% interval [-0.0046, 0.0004]). The interval includes zero, and its upper bound is below the analysis plan's 0.005 improvement target. Matching the selectors' hyperparameters also leaves the interval upper bound below that target. Evidence from retrieved similar users improves prompting by 0.0999 NDCG@5 over a control using randomly selected users matched for activity. The evidence-reading tests also reveal answer-position and tie-response biases. These results concern the tested selectors and candidate sets. They illustrate why diagnostic measurements should be evaluated by whether they improve recommendation choices beyond existing features and a fixed interface.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

When Learned Context Planning Fails to Beat Strong Retrieval: A Controlled Study of Planning, Routing, and Reranking for Long-Context QA

Learned context planning selects evidence atoms before an answer model reasons over them. We test whether this learned selection improves long-context multiple-choice QA after strong retrieval, routing, budgeted-selector, and reranking controls. Our primary diagnostic uses all 503 LongBench-v2 MCQ questions with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. The planner is SFT-trained on outcome-selected traces from 140 training and 28 development questions; because the 503-question analysis includes those questions, it is partly transductive. At an 18k-character budget, anchored hybrid retrieval reaches 36.18% accuracy and BM25 reaches 35.98%, while the best direct planner-guided method reaches 34.19%. On the untouched 152-question test split, anchored hybrid remains higher (42.11% versus 36.84%). Leakage-safe routers cannot convert a large oracle gap. Under tight budgets, the best planner is ahead by only 0.40 points at 6k and loses at 9k; planner-guided reranking has a +1.79-point estimate at 6k with a paired interval crossing zero and ties the control at 9k. Packing-order and score-flatness analyses did not identify a stable mechanism. Under this setup, learned planning is a weak relevance signal rather than a replacement for strong retrieval.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Tie Handling Is Part of the Evaluation Protocol: An Order-Invariance Audit for Tie-Heavy Recommender Scores

Offline top-k evaluation often ranks one held-out relevant item together with sampled negatives. When several candidates receive exactly the same score, the tie-breaking rule becomes part of the ranking. A common implementation stores the relevant item first and then applies a stable sort, which preserves input order among equal scores; the relevant item therefore wins every tie. We call an evaluator row-order invariant when permuting the input candidates without changing their identities, labels, or scores leaves the final ranking unchanged. We audit this property by holding candidates and scores fixed and changing only the tie-breaking rule. On 30,000 Amazon Beauty & Personal Care rows, NDCG@10 for a rating-weighted attribute-overlap score is 0.85 under input-order tie-breaking. A deterministic hash tie-break based on user and item IDs lowers it to 0.17. The exact expectation under uniform random tie-breaking closely matches the mean over 100 independent hash seeds, while a residualized attribute score with few exact ties is nearly unchanged. MovieLens Tag Genome shows the same pattern for an attribute-overlap score, whereas item popularity is nearly unchanged. We derive expected Hit Rate and NDCG at cutoff k when the relevant item is randomly ordered among candidates with the same score, and we provide a practical reporting checklist. The same issue can occur in sampled or full-catalog evaluation whenever exact ties affect top-k membership or rank.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

What Changes When Fact-Verification Scores Improve? Evidence and Answer Accounting Across Trained Verifiers and LLMs

A joint fact-verification score assesses answers and submitted evidence together. When the score improves, how much of the gain remains if the answers are held fixed? On FEVEROUS, strict score is the percentage of claims with a correct answer and a complete annotated evidence group in the submitted evidence. Across four trained DeBERTa checkpoints and 7,890 claims, replacing DCUF evidence with UnifEE evidence raises strict score by 9.61 percentage points, compared with 1.96 percentage points in answer accuracy. The paired 95% interval for the strict-score gain is [8.77, 10.43], conditional on these checkpoints. Replacing only the evidence passed to the scorer accounts for 7.92 or 9.08 percentage points when we retain the answers generated from DCUF or UnifEE evidence, respectively. To examine how this evidence gain depends on evaluation choices, we generate 470,400 responses from two 8B LLMs on FEVER, FEVEROUS, and SciFact under two answer formats and two context budgets. Increasing context from 256 to 2,048 tokens raises the fixed-answer evidence gain on FEVEROUS by 3.84 and 3.10 percentage points for Qwen and Llama, respectively. The effects fall short of the prespecified cross-dataset criterion, while some intervals extend beyond the two-point small-effect bound. Post-hoc analyses quantify changes in answers and submitted evidence, and show when aggregate accuracy and evidence-coverage rates miss the claim-level pattern. The four answer-evidence score combinations reveal changes that endpoint and aggregate metrics leave unresolved.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

HYDRA: Proactive Android Malware Drift Adaptation via Hierarchical Graph Contrastive Learning

Concept drift, driven by the rapid evolution of Android malware, severely degrades the performance of machine learning detectors. Current adaptation strategies are often reactive, responding only after performance has dropped and imposing a significant manual annotation burden, or they are proactive but rely on unstable adversarial training and incomplete, single-level graph representations. To overcome these limitations, we propose HYDRA (Hybrid Drift Adaptation), a proactive adaptation framework that learns drift-invariant representations from hierarchically structured data. HYDRA first models applications using a hybrid graph structure, combining fine-grained Control Flow Graphs (CFGs) and coarse-grained Function Call Graphs (FCGs) to capture comprehensive behavioral patterns. It then introduces a novel cross-domain contrastive learning objective that aligns historical (source) and new (target) data distributions. By generating pseudo-labels for unlabeled target samples, our method pulls representations of semantically similar applications together, regardless of their domain, within a single, stable optimization process. This approach unifies feature learning and domain alignment, eliminating the need for complex adversarial objectives. Extensive experiments on large-scale, time-ordered malware datasets demonstrate that HYDRA achieves substantially lower False Negative and False Positive Rates than state-of-the-art baselines while requiring up to 87.5% fewer labeled samples. Our work thus offers a robust and efficient solution to combat concept drift in security applications.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Multi-Track Time-Series Burst-Overlap Interferometry for Resolving Horizontal Deformation in Earthquake-Cycle Studies

Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) is intrinsically insensitive to the north-south component of crustal motion because of its near-polar geometry, which makes accurate quantification of this deformation a persistent limitation of InSAR. We introduce a Multi-track Time-Series Burst-Overlap Interferometry (MTSB) framework that delivers absolute, ITRF-referenced deformation fields across representative interseismic, coseismic, and postseismic applications by combining optimized phase linking, a unified time-series framework for separating deformation and residual misregistration, and block-wise spectral analysis. Case studies spanning co-, inter-, and postseismic phases demonstrate that MTSB accurately resolves along-track horizontal deformation, with primary sensitivity to north-south motion, while substantially reducing orbit-related artifacts. Independent comparisons with GNSS indicate centimeter-level agreement for postseismic and coseismic displacement estimates and millimeter-per-year agreement for interseismic velocities. The resulting deformation fields improve constraints on regional plate kinematics and fault kinematics, facilitate more reliable Euler-pole estimation, and provide by-product orbital corrections for conventional InSAR processing.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Markov Chain Monte Carlo with Diffusion Paths

Sampling from multimodal distributions is a longstanding challenge for classical local Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. A popular remedy is to introduce a sequence of intermediate distributions that interpolate between the target and a simpler reference. The classical choice, tempering, raises the density to a power, but distorts the relative weights of asymmetric modes and can lead to poor mixing. We instead propose interpolating along the diffusion path, the marginals of a noising diffusion process that carries the target toward a Gaussian. This path preserves the relative weights of the modes and enjoys favorable mixing properties, which we make precise through a spectral-gap analysis of the corresponding ideal transition kernel. Sampling along the path requires its intermediate scores, which can be estimated from the unnormalized target through variational approaches, yielding only an approximate sampler. To remove the resulting bias, we introduce the Metropolis-adjusted diffusion path (MAD-Path) sampler, which corrects the diffusion-path proposal in an augmented path space and leaves the target invariant regardless of the accuracy of the learned score or the discretization error. We further quantify how these two errors affect the acceptance probability, providing guidance for practical tuning. Experiments on a range of Bayesian posteriors show that MAD-Path improves global exploration and mode-weight estimation relative to tempering-based MCMC methods and unadjusted diffusion samplers.

stat.CO↗
arXiv2026

MemForest: An Efficient Agent Memory System with Hierarchical Temporal Indexing

Memory is a fundamental component for long-context LLM agents, supporting persistent state across interactions through a continuous serve-and-update lifecycle. Despite substantial prior work, many stateful systems retain sequential autoregressive extraction or state-dependent maintenance on the write path, delaying when new evidence becomes queryable. To address these challenges, we present MemForest, a memory framework that reformulates agent memory as a write-efficient temporal data-management problem. MemForest breaks the sequential bottleneck via parallel extraction, decoupling memory construction into concurrent, independent operations. We further introduce MemTree, a hierarchical temporal index that organizes memory as time-ordered trees and replaces global rewrites with localized dirty-path refresh. Dirty summaries can be refreshed in parallel across nodes and trees. End-to-end work remains proportional to incoming content; the logarithmic bound applies only to structural insertion and level-dependent refresh depth in balanced trees. We evaluate MemForest on two long-context benchmarks, LongMemEval-S and LoCoMo. Experiments use Qwen3-4B, Qwen3-30B, and Gemma-4-12B-IT. With Qwen3-30B, MemForest reaches 81.8 percent pass at 1 on LongMemEval-S, while its input-normalized build rate is 6.0 times that of EverMemOS. On LoCoMo categories 1 to 4, it reaches 84.09 percent, within 0.13 percentage points of EverMemOS; on a matched conversation, its build rate is 9.5 times higher. These results show that MemForest reduces memory-freshness latency while retaining strong answer quality.

cs.DB↗
arXiv2026

RW-TTT: Batched Serving for Request-Owned Test-Time Training State

Test-time training (TTT) adapts an LLM during generation by reading and updating request-owned state, such as fast weights, low-rank deltas, or streaming learner state. This breaks batched LLM serving, which assumes shared static weights: serial execution is correct but slow, while naive batching can corrupt request state. We formulate this problem as read-write TTT serving and present RW-TTT , which tags each decode step with its owner, version, and READ/WRITE effect, batches only compatible phases, and commits updates only to the owner. On one GPU with eight fast-weight InPlace-TTT streams, RW-TTT reaches 274.61 aggregate tok/s, 9.31x over sequential serving and 3.44x over per-stream replicas under the same memory budget. It preserves behavior on RULER, a long-context benchmark, and passes owner/version checks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

TempCloze: Can Video-LLMs Identify the Missing Middle?

Temporal reasoning benchmarks for Video-LLMs are often mediated by language, leaving room for linguistic shortcuts from option wording, answer correlations, or language priors. To reduce such shortcuts, we introduce TempCloze, a video cloze benchmark for evaluating visual temporal reasoning in Video-LLMs. Given the beginning and ending clips of a video, models must identify the true missing middle from four candidates. TempCloze contains 1,521 carefully filtered videos from seven sources, mainly long-take and egocentric videos. We construct same-source distractors along three dimensions: Semantic asks what event should happen, Alignment probes when it should occur, and Progression tests how it should unfold, while shared scenes and objects reduce appearance cues. Our evaluation of 10 proprietary and 21 open-source Video-LLMs reveals Alignment as the primary bottleneck: models often recognize plausible semantic content and local event progression but struggle with temporal alignment. We further conduct error pattern and behavioral sensitivity analyses on TempCloze-Mixed and TempCloze-Hard with four representative models to examine where errors arise and how candidate order, context direction, visible span, frame density, and test-time scaling influence model choices.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

LLMs Struggle to Measure What Distinguishes Students of Different Proficiency Levels: A Study of Item Discrimination in Reading Comprehension Assessment

Existing work on LLM-based educational assessment has focused largely on item difficulty, but difficulty alone does not indicate whether an item meaningfully distinguishes higher- from lower-proficiency students. Item discrimination captures this complementary and fundamental psychometric property. We investigate whether LLMs can predict human item discrimination from assessment content. We evaluate 42 proprietary and open-weight LLMs using two complementary approaches. Direct discrimination prediction asks models to explicitly predict an item's discrimination value, while response-based proxy estimation treats LLM answers as synthetic responses and applies a Classical Test Theory (CTT)-inspired item-rest calculation. Direct predictions show weak alignment with human item discrimination. The response-based proxy provides a stronger but still limited ranking signal, reaching a CEFR-stratified rank correlation of 0.231. Further analysis shows that this correlation comes mainly from differences across models rather than proficiency prompts that reliably simulate students at different ability levels. Current LLMs therefore contain some discrimination-relevant information, but they do not yet reliably model the ability-conditioned human response behavior that gives item discrimination its psychometric meaning.

cs.CL↗