Guohou Zhang | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

BEACON: Distilled Begin/End-Aware Structured Decoding for Continuous Sign Language Segmentation

In segmentation-based continuous sign language recognition, an untrimmed video is first partitioned into lexical units; segmentation is therefore a means to an end---downstream recognition. However, segmenters are usually judged by local boundary detection rather than by the quality of the lexical segments and the recognition they enable. We present BEACON, a begin/end-aware segmenter that combines four-class Outside/Begin/Inside/End (BIOE) labeling, constrained Viterbi decoding over eight legal transitions, and boundary knowledge distilled from a binary teacher into a shared student. Under strict no-cut evaluation with validation-based model selection, BEACON improves segment-F1 by 14.58/14.59 points and boundary-F1 by 2.17/1.22 points, and reduces the downstream word error rate (WER) by 9.10/4.15 points relative to the state-of-the-art in the PHOENIX-14/BSL Corpus. To examine which segmentation metric better reflects downstream recognition, we evaluated five distinct architecture families. Segment-F1 aligns more consistently with lower WER than boundary-F1 in both corpora (Spearman $ρ=-1.0/-0.9$ versus $-0.9/-0.8$). These results support evaluating sign language segmentation in terms of segment quality and downstream recognition utility rather than local boundary accuracy alone.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Temporal Overlap: Consumer-Aware Evaluation of Sign-Language Segmentation across Three Corpora

Sign-language segmentation divides continuous signing into clips. In this study, the downstream consumer is a frozen recognizer that assigns one sign label to each predicted clip. Existing metrics instead compare predicted clips with manually annotated boundaries. They do not directly measure whether a clip preserves the visual evidence needed by the recognizer or whether the segmenter produces too many clips. We therefore ask whether overlap metrics and this consumer prefer the same segmenter. We evaluate 27 outputs from three segmentation architectures, three random seeds, and three corpora. Controlled boundary edits separate the effect of removing sign evidence from that of adding surrounding context. Overlap predicts recognition on average, but it does not always determine model choice. At the same intersection-over-union, different recognizers can prefer the shorter or the longer clip. The real outputs reveal two operating regimes. On DGS, overlap, recognition, and sequence error select the same model. On BSL, recognition-based selection recovers and recognizes more reference signs but increases word error rate (WER). Dicta-Sign shows the reverse trade-off: WER selection reduces in-vocabulary WER by 31.17 points but misses more recognizable signs. Segmenters should therefore be evaluated on four axes: temporal agreement, reference recovery, clip recognition, and sequence error, rather than on overlap alone.

cs.CV↗