Dust Survival in Lensed Quiescent Galaxies at $z>1$ Depends on How They Quench
The interstellar medium of massive quiescent galaxies holds key clues to how they quench, yet remain poorly understood. Although dust is expected to be depleted rapidly ($\lesssim$100 Myr) after quenching, some quiescent galaxies host substantial dust reservoirs, raising the question of whether dust survives quenching or is replenished afterward. We present ALMA Band 6 continuum observations ($λ_{\mathrm{rest}}$$>$250$μ$m) of eight strongly-lensed, spectroscopically-selected quiescent galaxies at z$\sim$1-2.5 from the COOL-LAMPS and REQUIEM surveys, plus five archival REQUIEM systems. The sample spans more than two orders of magnitude in dust-to-stellar-mass ratio ($f_{\mathrm{dust}}<10^{-5}$ to $>10^{-3}$), and two galaxies host extended, resolved dust. Comparing $f_{\mathrm{dust}}$ with time since quenching, roughly half the sample, preferentially at higher redshift, is consistent with rapid quenching and harsh dust destruction, while lower-redshift, more slowly quenched systems are consistent with milder destruction, possibly reflecting an evolving dominant quenching mode. The two most dust-rich galaxies exceed even the mildest model destruction tracks, with J1201-3952 retaining the highest $f_{\mathrm{dust}}$ $\sim$1.8 Gyr after quenching. If these systems are truly quiescent, their dust masses approach maximum stellar yields, pointing to ISM grain regrowth and/or TP-AGB dust production. However due to our single-band continuum data, $f_{\mathrm{dust}}$ is uncertain ($\pm$0.3 dex systematic uncertainty from the unknown dust temperature) and we cannot rule out obscured star formation in these two galaxies. Our results suggest that dust survival depends on how galaxies quench: rapid, harsh quenching efficiently destroys dust, while slower, milder quenching can leave dust reservoirs that persist or are replenished long after star formation ceases.