arXiv subjects

Giannis Fikioris

Publications and source records attributed to Giannis Fikioris.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Resource Allocation and Conversion along the Org Chart

We consider the allocation of multiple heterogeneous resources to agents who are organized according to an organizational hierarchy. In a company those correspond to business units, departments, and engineering teams. In government it corresponds to federal, state, and municipal levels as well as various agencies within each. In a university it corresponds to schools, departments, and research groups. The resources are also distributed along the same organizational tree: part of the supply is available only to certain sub-trees since it is purchased for the exclusive use of certain departments or units, and some supply is available to the entire tree. We consider the allocation with multiple types of resources where there is a possibility of converting between certain pairs of resources. We formulate this allocation problem as a market equilibrium problem and derive the necessary conditions to find a feasible solution. We prove that such a feasible solution always exists and provide an algorithm to compute it. Finally, we test our algorithm on a real dataset of the allocation of computing resources, such as TPUs and GPUs at Google. Our results rely on a novel two-step process, differentiating it from previous approaches. First, we show how to solve ``easy'' (harmonic) instances of our problem that satisfy certain structural properties. Then, we show how to efficiently approximate general instances by a series of easier harmonic instances, whose solutions converge efficiently to the solution of the original problem.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Learning vs. Optimizing Bidders in Budgeted Auctions

The study of repeated interactions between a learner and a utility-maximizing optimizer has yielded deep insights into the manipulability of learning algorithms. However, existing literature primarily focuses on independent, unlinked rounds, largely ignoring the ubiquitous practical reality of budget constraints. In this paper, we study this interaction in repeated second-price auctions in a Bayesian setting between a learning agent and a strategic agent, both subject to strict budget constraints, showing that such cross-round constraints fundamentally alter the strategic landscape. First, we generalize the classic Stackelberg equilibrium to the Budgeted Stackelberg Equilibrium. We prove that an optimizer's optimal strategy in a budgeted setting requires time-multiplexing; for a $k$-dimensional budget constraint, the optimal strategy strictly decomposes into up to $k+1$ distinct phases, with each phase employing a possibly unique mixed strategy (the case of $k=0$ recovers the classic Stackelberg equilibrium where the optimizer repeatedly uses a single mixed strategy). Second, we address the intriguing question of non-manipulability. We prove that when the learner employs a standard Proportional controller (the "P" of the PID-controller) to pace their bids, the optimizer's utility is upper bounded by their objective value in the Budgeted Stackelberg Equilibrium baseline. By bounding the dynamics of the PID controller via a novel analysis, our results establish that this widely used control-theoretic heuristic is actually strategically robust.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Robust Temporal Guarantees in Budgeted Sequential Auctions

In modern advertising platforms, learning algorithms are deployed by budget-constrained bidders to maximize their accumulated value. These algorithms often offer classical utility guarantees like no-regret, i.e., the agent's utility is at least the utility achieved by some benchmark in which it is assumed that every other agent's bidding remains the same. These guarantees offer compelling properties: They are optimal against stationary competition distributions, and in unconstrained settings, the resulting empirical distribution of play induced by no-regret dynamics approximates a Coarse Correlated Equilibrium. However, no-regret algorithms are easily manipulable, and in budgeted settings, no stronger notion of regret (such as swap regret) is currently known that would limit such manipulation. We propose a very simple learning algorithm for budgeted sequential auctions where agents maximize their total number of wins and show that it has surprisingly appealing properties. We analyze this algorithm from two perspectives. First, we show that when an agent with a $ρ$ fraction of the total budget uses this algorithm, then she is guaranteed to win at least $ρT - O(\sqrt T)$ of the total $T$ rounds. This result holds for adversarial behavior by the other agents, as long as they respect their own budget restrictions. Second, we examine the scenario when all the agents follow our algorithm. By the first result, every agent's total wins are proportional to her budget, up to the additive $O(\sqrt T)$ term. In addition, we show that this result holds in a much stronger sense: after an initial period of $O(\sqrt T \log T)$ rounds, every agent gets the same guarantee over any time interval. For intervals of length $O(\sqrt T)$, we show that the deviation from the desired number of wins is an additive constant.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Robust Resource Allocation via Competitive Subsidies

A canonical setting for non-monetary online resource allocation is one where agents compete over multiple rounds for a single item per round, with i.i.d. valuations and additive utilities across rounds. With $n$ symmetric agents, a natural benchmark for each agent is the utility realized by her favorite $1/n$-fraction of rounds; a line of work has demonstrated one can robustly guarantee each agent a constant fraction of this ideal utility, irrespective of how other agents behave. In particular, several mechanisms have been shown to be $1/2$-robust, and recent work established that repeated first-price auctions based on artificial credits have a robustness factor of $0.59$, which cannot be improved beyond $0.6$ using first-price and simple strategies. In contrast, even without strategic considerations, the best achievable factor is $1-1/e\approx 0.63$. In this work, we break the $0.6$ first-price barrier to get a new $0.625$-robust mechanism, which almost closes the gap to the non-strategic robustness bound. Surprisingly, we do so via a simple auction, where in each round, bidders decide if they ask for the item, and we allocate uniformly at random among those who ask. The main new ingredient is the idea of competitive subsidies, wherein we charge the winning agent an amount in artificial credits that decreases when fewer agents are bidding (specifically, when $k$ agents bid, then the winner pays proportional to $k/(k+1)$, varying the payment by a factor of 2 depending on the competition). Moreover, we show how it can be modified to get an equilibrium strategy with a slightly weaker robust guarantee of $5/(3e) \approx 0.61$ (and the optimal $1-1/e$ factor at equilibrium). Finally, we show that our mechanism gives the best possible bound under a wide class of auction-based mechanisms.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Robust Equilibria in Shared Resource Allocation via Strengthening Border's Theorem

We consider repeated allocation of a shared resource via a non-monetary mechanism, wherein a single item must be allocated to one of multiple agents in each round. We assume that each agent has i.i.d. values for the item across rounds, and additive utilities. Past work on this problem has proposed mechanisms where agents can get one of two kinds of guarantees: $(i)$ (approximate) Bayes-Nash equilibria via linkage-based mechanisms which need extensive knowledge of the value distributions, and $(ii)$ simple distribution-agnostic mechanisms with robust utility guarantees for each individual agent, which are worse than the Nash outcome, but hold irrespective of how others behave (including possibly collusive behavior). Recent work has hinted at barriers to achieving both simultaneously. Our work however establishes this is not the case, by proposing the first mechanism in which each agent has a natural strategy that is both a Bayes-Nash equilibrium and also comes with strong robust guarantees for individual agent utilities. Our mechanism comes out of a surprising connection between the online shared resource allocation problem and implementation theory, and uses a surprising strengthening of Border's theorem. In particular, we show that establishing robust equilibria in this setting reduces to showing that a particular subset of the Border polytope is non-empty. We establish this via a novel joint Schur-convexity argument. This strengthening of Border's criterion for obtaining a stronger conclusion is of independent technical interest, as it may prove useful in other settings.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Beyond Worst-Case Online Allocation via Dynamic Max-min Fairness

We study the allocation of shared resources over multiple rounds among competing agents, via the dynamic max-min fair (DMMF) mechanism: the good in each round is allocated to the requesting agent with the least number of allocations received to date. We show that in large markets when an agent has i.i.d. values across rounds, under mild distributional assumptions (e.g., bounded PDF function), the DMMF mechanism allows each agent to realize a $1 - o(1)$ fraction of her ideal utility -- her highest achievable utility given her nominal share of resources. This guarantee holds under arbitrary behavior by other agents and is achieved by characterizing the agent's utility under a rich space of strategies, wherein an agent can tune how aggressive to be in requesting the item. Our techniques also allow us to handle settings where an agent's values are correlated across rounds, thereby allowing an adversary to predict and block her future values. By tuning the aggressiveness, an agent can guarantee $Ω(γ)$ fraction of her ideal utility, where $γ\in [0, 1]$ is a parameter that quantifies dependence across rounds (with $γ= 1$ indicating full independence and lower values indicating more correlation). Finally, we extend our efficiency results to the case of reusable resources, where an agent might need to hold the item over multiple rounds to receive utility. Our results subsume previous guarantees obtained using a more complicated mechanism proving a half ideal utility guarantee under i.i.d. values sampled from worst-case distributions.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Learning in Budgeted Auctions with Spacing Objectives

In many repeated auction settings, participants care not only about how frequently they win but also how their winnings are distributed over time. This problem arises in various practical domains where avoiding congested demand is crucial, such as online retail sales and compute services, as well as in advertising campaigns that require sustained visibility over time. We introduce a simple model of this phenomenon, modeling it as a budgeted auction where the value of a win is a concave function of the time since the last win. This implies that for a given number of wins, even spacing over time is optimal. We also extend our model and results to the case when not all wins result in "conversions" (realization of actual gains), and the probability of conversion depends on a context. The goal is to maximize and evenly space conversions rather than just wins. We study the optimal policies for this setting in second-price auctions and offer learning algorithms for the bidders that achieve low regret against the optimal bidding policy in a Bayesian online setting. Our main result is a computationally efficient online learning algorithm that achieves $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret. We achieve this by showing that an infinite-horizon Markov decision process (MDP) with the budget constraint in expectation is essentially equivalent to our problem, even when limiting that MDP to a very small number of states. The algorithm achieves low regret by learning a bidding policy that chooses bids as a function of the context and the system's state, which will be the time elapsed since the last win (or conversion). We show that state-independent strategies incur linear regret even without uncertainty of conversions. We complement this by showing that there are state-independent strategies that, while still having linear regret, achieve a $(1-\frac 1 e)$ approximation to the optimal reward.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Online Resource Sharing: Better Robust Guarantees via Randomized Strategies

We study the problem of fair online resource allocation via non-monetary mechanisms, where multiple agents repeatedly share a resource without monetary transfers. Previous work has shown that every agent can guarantee $1/2$ of their ideal utility (the highest achievable utility given their fair share of resources) robustly, i.e., under arbitrary behavior by the other agents. While this $1/2$-robustness guarantee has now been established under very different mechanisms, including pseudo-markets and dynamic max-min allocation, improving on it has appeared difficult. In this work, we obtain the first significant improvement on the robustness of online resource sharing. In more detail, we consider the widely-studied repeated first-price auction with artificial currencies. Our main contribution is to show that a simple randomized bidding strategy can guarantee each agent a $2 - \sqrt 2 \approx 0.59$ fraction of her ideal utility, irrespective of others' bids. Specifically, our strategy requires each agent with fair share $α$ to use a uniformly distributed bid whenever her value is in the top $α$-quantile of her value distribution. Our work almost closes the gap to the known $1 - 1/e \approx 0.63$ hardness for robust resource sharing; we also show that any static (i.e., budget independent) bidding policy cannot guarantee more than a $0.6$-fraction of the ideal utility, showing our technique is almost tight.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Allocating Public Goods via Dynamic Max-Min Fairness: Long-Run Behavior and Competitive Equilibria

Dynamic max-min fair allocation (DMMF) is a simple and popular mechanism for the repeated allocation of a shared resource among competing agents: in each round, each agent can choose to request or not for the resource, which is then allocated to the requesting agent with the least number of allocations received till then. Recent work has shown that under DMMF, a simple threshold-based request policy enjoys surprisingly strong robustness properties, wherein each agent can realize a significant fraction of her optimal utility irrespective of how other agents' behave. While this goes some way in mitigating the possibility of a 'tragedy of the commons' outcome, the robust policies require that an agent defend against arbitrary (possibly adversarial) behavior by other agents. This however may be far from optimal compared to real world settings, where other agents are selfish optimizers rather than adversaries. Therefore, robust guarantees give no insight on how agents behave in an equilibrium, and whether outcomes are improved under one. Our work aims to bridge this gap by studying the existence and properties of equilibria under DMMF. To this end, we first show that despite the strong robustness guarantees of the threshold based strategies, no Nash equilibrium exists when agents participate in DMMF, each using some fixed threshold-based policy. On the positive side, however, we show that for the symmetric case, a simple data-driven request policy guarantees that no agent benefits from deviating to a different fixed threshold policy. In our proposed policy agents aim to match the historical allocation rate with a vanishing drift towards the rate optimizing overall welfare for all users. Furthermore, the resulting equilibrium outcome can be significantly better compared to what follows from the robustness guarantees.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

Liquid Welfare Guarantees for No-Regret Learning in Sequential Budgeted Auctions

We study the liquid welfare in sequential first-price auctions with budget-limited buyers. We focus on first-price auctions, which are increasingly commonly used in many settings, and consider liquid welfare, a natural and well-studied generalization of social welfare for buyers with budgets. We use a behavioral model for the buyers, assuming a learning style guarantee: the resulting utility of each buyer is within a $γ$ factor (where $γ\ge 1$) of the utility achievable by shading her value with the same factor at each round. Under this assumption, we show a $γ+1/2+O(1/γ)$ price of anarchy for liquid welfare assuming buyers have additive valuations. This positive result is in contrast to sequential second-price auctions, where even with $γ=1$, the resulting liquid welfare can be arbitrarily smaller than the maximum liquid welfare. We prove a lower bound of $γ$ on the liquid welfare loss under the above assumption in first-price auctions, making our bound asymptotically tight. For the case when $γ= 1$ our theorem implies a price of anarchy upper bound that is about $2.41$; we show a lower bound of $2$ for that case. We also give a learning algorithm that the players can use to achieve the guarantee needed for our liquid welfare result. Our algorithm achieves utility within a $γ=O(1)$ factor of the optimal utility even when a buyer's values and the bids of the other buyers are chosen adversarially, assuming the buyer's budget grows linearly with time. The competitiveness guarantee of the learning algorithm deteriorates somewhat as the budget grows slower than linearly with time. Finally, we extend our liquid welfare results for the case where buyers have submodular valuations over the set of items they win across iterations with a slightly worse price of anarchy bound of $γ+1+O(1/γ)$ compared to the guarantee for the additive case.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraints

Advertisers increasingly use automated bidding to optimize their ad campaigns on online advertising platforms. Autobidding optimizes an advertiser's objective subject to various constraints, e.g. average ROI and budget constraints. In this paper, we study the problem of designing online autobidding algorithms to optimize value subject to ROI and budget constraints when the platform is running any mixture of first and second price auction. We consider the following stochastic setting: There is an item for sale in each of $T$ rounds. In each round, buyers submit bids and an auction is run to sell the item. We focus on one buyer, possibly with budget and ROI constraints. We assume that the buyer's value and the highest competing bid are drawn i.i.d. from some unknown (joint) distribution in each round. We design a low-regret bidding algorithm that satisfies the buyer's constraints. Our benchmark is the objective value achievable by the best possible Lipschitz function that maps values to bids, which is rich enough to best respond to many different correlation structures between value and highest competing bid. Our main result is an algorithm with full information feedback that guarantees a near-optimal $\tilde O(\sqrt T)$ regret with respect to the best Lipschitz function. Our result applies to a wide range of auctions, most notably any mixture of first and second price auctions (price is a convex combination of the first and second price). In addition, our result holds for both value-maximizing buyers and quasi-linear utility-maximizing buyers. We also study the bandit setting, where we show an $Ω(T^{2/3})$ lower bound on the regret for first-price auctions, showing a large disparity between the full information and bandit settings. We also design an algorithm with $\tilde O(T^{3/4})$ regret, when the value distribution is known and is independent of the highest competing bid.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Robust Pseudo-Markets for Reusable Public Resources

We study non-monetary mechanisms for the fair and efficient allocation of reusable public resources, i.e., resources used for varying durations. We consider settings where a limited resource is repeatedly shared among a set of agents, each of whom may request to use the resource over multiple consecutive rounds, receiving utility only if they get to use the resource for the full duration of their request. Such settings are of particular significance in scientific research where large-scale instruments such as electron microscopes, particle colliders, or telescopes are shared between multiple research groups; this model also subsumes and extends existing models of repeated non-monetary allocation where resources are required for a single round only. We study a simple pseudo-market mechanism where upfront we endow each agent with a budget of artificial credits, proportional to the fair share of the resource we want the agent to receive. The endowments thus define for each agent her ideal utility as that which she derives from her favorite allocation with no competition, but subject to getting at most her fair share of the resource across rounds. Next, on each round, and for each available resource item, our mechanism runs a first-price auction with a selective reserve, wherein each agent submits a desired duration and a per-round-bid, which must be at least the reserve price if requesting for multiple rounds; the bidder with the highest per-round-bid wins, and gets to use the item for the desired duration. We consider this problem in a Bayesian setting and show that under a carefully chosen reserve price, irrespective of how others bid, each agent has a simple strategy that guarantees she receives a $1/2$ fraction of her ideal utility in expectation. We also show this result is tight, i.e., no mechanism can guarantee that all agents get more than half of their ideal utility.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

An extension to "A subsemigroup of the rook monoid"

A recent paper studied an inverse submonoid $M_n$ of the rook monoid, by representing the nonzero elements of $M_n$ via certain triplets belonging to $\mathbb{Z}^3$. In this short note, we allow the triplets to belong to $\mathbb{R}^3$. We thus study a new inverse monoid $\overline{M}_n$, which is a supermonoid of $M_n$. We point out similarities and find essential differences. We show that $\overline{M}_n$ is a noncommutative, periodic, combinatorial, fundamental, completely semisimple, and strongly $E^*$-unitary inverse monoid.

math.CO↗

arXiv2023

Approximately Stationary Bandits with Knapsacks

Bandits with Knapsacks (BwK), the generalization of the Bandits problem under global budget constraints, has received a lot of attention in recent years. Previous work has focused on one of the two extremes: Stochastic BwK where the rewards and consumptions of the resources of each round are sampled from an i.i.d. distribution, and Adversarial BwK where these parameters are picked by an adversary. Achievable guarantees in the two cases exhibit a massive gap: No-regret learning is achievable in the stochastic case, but in the adversarial case only competitive ratio style guarantees are achievable, where the competitive ratio depends either on the budget or on both the time and the number of resources. What makes this gap so vast is that in Adversarial BwK the guarantees get worse in the typical case when the budget is more binding. While ``best-of-both-worlds'' type algorithms are known (single algorithms that provide the best achievable guarantee in each extreme case), their bounds degrade to the adversarial case as soon as the environment is not fully stochastic. Our work aims to bridge this gap, offering guarantees for a workload that is not exactly stochastic but is also not worst-case. We define a condition, Approximately Stationary BwK, that parameterizes how close to stochastic or adversarial an instance is. Based on these parameters, we explore what is the best competitive ratio attainable in BwK. We explore two algorithms that are oblivious to the values of the parameters but guarantee competitive ratios that smoothly transition between the best possible guarantees in the two extreme cases, depending on the values of the parameters. Our guarantees offer great improvement over the adversarial guarantee, especially when the available budget is small. We also prove bounds on the achievable guarantee, showing that our results are approximately tight when the budget is small.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Karma: Resource Allocation for Dynamic Demands

We consider the problem of fair resource allocation in a system where user demands are dynamic, that is, where user demands vary over time. Our key observation is that the classical max-min fairness algorithm for resource allocation provides many desirable properties (e.g., Pareto efficiency, strategy-proofness, and fairness), but only under the strong assumption of user demands being static over time. For the realistic case of dynamic user demands, the max-min fairness algorithm loses one or more of these properties. We present Karma, a new resource allocation mechanism for dynamic user demands. The key technical contribution in Karma is a credit-based resource allocation algorithm: in each quantum, users donate their unused resources and are assigned credits when other users borrow these resources; Karma carefully orchestrates the exchange of credits across users (based on their instantaneous demands, donated resources and borrowed resources), and performs prioritized resource allocation based on users' credits. We theoretically establish Karma guarantees related to Pareto efficiency, strategy-proofness, and fairness for dynamic user demands. Empirical evaluations over production workloads show that these properties translate well into practice: Karma is able to reduce disparity in performance across users to a bare minimum while maintaining Pareto-optimal system-wide performance.

cs.OS↗

arXiv2022

A subsemigroup of the rook monoid

We define a subsemigroup $S_n$ of the rook monoid $R_n$ and investigate its properties. To do this, we represent the nonzero elements of $S_n$ (which are $n\times n$ matrices) via certain triplets of integers, and develop a closed-form expression representing the product of two elements; these tools facilitate straightforward deductions of a great number of properties. For example, we show that $S_n$ consists solely of idempotents and nilpotents, find the numbers of idempotents and nilpotents, and compute nilpotency indexes. Furthermore, we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the $j$th root of a nonzero element to exist in $S_n$, show that existence implies uniqueness, and compute the said root explicitly. We also point to several combinatorial aspects; describe a number of subsemigroups of $S_n$; and, using rook $n$-diagrams, graphically interpret many of our results.

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Incentives in Dominant Resource Fair Allocation under Dynamic Demands

Every computer system -- from schedulers in clouds (e.g. Amazon) to computer networks to operating systems -- performs resource allocation across system users. The defacto allocation policies are max-min fairness (MMF) for single resources and dominant resource fairness (DRF) for multiple resources which guarantee properties like incentive compatibility, envy-freeness, and Pareto efficiency, assuming user demands are static (time-independent). However, in real-world systems, user demands are dynamic, i.e. time-dependant. As a result, there is now a fundamental mismatch between the goals of computer systems and the properties enabled by classic resource allocation policies. We aim to bridge this mismatch. When demands are dynamic, instant-by-instant MMF can be extremely unfair over longer periods of time, i.e. lead to unbalanced user allocations as previous allocations have no effect in the present. We consider a natural generalization of MMF and DRF for multiple resources and users with dynamic demands: this algorithm ensures that user allocations are as max-min fair as possible up to any time instant, given past allocations. This dynamic mechanism remains Pareto optimal and envy-free, but not incentive compatible. However, our results show that the possible increase in utility by misreporting is bounded and, since this can lead to significant decrease in overall useful allocation, this suggests that it is not a useful strategy. Our main result is to show that our dynamic DRF algorithm is $(1+ρ)$-incentive compatible, where $ρ$ quantifies the relative importance of a resource for different users; we show that this factor is tight even with only two resources. We also present a $3/2$ upper bound and a $\sqrt 2$ lower bound for incentive compatibility when there is only one resource. We also offer extensions for the case when users are weighted to prioritize them differently.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2020

Mechanism Design for Perturbation Stable Combinatorial Auctions

Motivated by recent research on combinatorial markets with endowed valuations by (Babaioff et al., EC 2018) and (Ezra et al., EC 2020), we introduce a notion of perturbation stability in Combinatorial Auctions (CAs) and study the extend to which stability helps in social welfare maximization and mechanism design. A CA is $γ\textit{-stable}$ if the optimal solution is resilient to inflation, by a factor of $γ\geq 1$, of any bidder's valuation for any single item. On the positive side, we show how to compute efficiently an optimal allocation for 2-stable subadditive valuations and that a Walrasian equilibrium exists for 2-stable submodular valuations. Moreover, we show that a Parallel 2nd Price Auction (P2A) followed by a demand query for each bidder is truthful for general subadditive valuations and results in the optimal allocation for 2-stable submodular valuations. To highlight the challenges behind optimization and mechanism design for stable CAs, we show that a Walrasian equilibrium may not exist for $γ$-stable XOS valuations for any $γ$, that a polynomial-time approximation scheme does not exist for $(2-ε)$-stable submodular valuations, and that any DSIC mechanism that computes the optimal allocation for stable CAs and does not use demand queries must use exponentially many value queries. We conclude with analyzing the Price of Anarchy of P2A and Parallel 1st Price Auctions (P1A) for CAs with stable submodular and XOS valuations. Our results indicate that the quality of equilibria of simple non-truthful auctions improves only for $γ$-stable instances with $γ\geq 3$.

cs.GT↗