arXiv subjects

Gerald Friedland

Publications and source records attributed to Gerald Friedland.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Mitra-v2 Technical Report

We introduce Mitra-v2, a tabular foundation model that delivers state-of-the-art performance on real-world classification and regression problems, from credit-risk scoring and clinical prediction to equipment-failure detection and house-price estimation. Mitra-v2 is trained only on synthetic data, with a pretraining distribution that is much larger and more diverse than Mitra-v1's. Built on a small 2D Transformer backbone, Mitra-v2 supports longer contexts and larger feature spaces. Improved optimization lets it learn from this larger task distribution. We evaluate Mitra-v2 on the TabArena and TALENT benchmarks, comprising more than 300 real-world datasets under two evaluation protocols. On the full TabArena benchmark, Mitra-v2 delivers state-of-the-art performance at the level of the industry-scale TabFM and EXAONE Tabular models, while surpassing TabPFN-3 by a wide margin in both classification and regression. Mitra-v2 matches the 1.6B-parameter TabFM with only 5% of its size (77M parameters), delivering frontier performance at a fraction of the cost. On TALENT, Mitra-v2 remains among the leading models, clearly outperforming TabPFN-3 and TabICLv2. It also ranks first on classification tasks with more than ten classes, even though it was pretrained only on tasks with at most ten classes. These results make Mitra-v2 one of the strongest and most broadly applicable open tabular foundation models released to date. We release the model weights, the inference and fine-tuning code, and our evaluation results under the Apache-2.0 license.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for large language model (LLM) post-training, but its reliance on coarse outcome rewards leads to limited guidance on intermediate reasoning processes. Existing approaches such as process reward modeling and on-policy distillation introduce additional constraints, such as reliance on a specialized reward model or assuming identical reasoning patterns between teacher and student. Nevertheless, we observe that once a reasoning process first goes wrong, evaluating the subsequent reasoning provides limited additional information, as it is already conditioned on an invalid prefix. Therefore, we propose Cliff, a reward shaping strategy that utilizes an off-the-shelf LLM as a teacher to identify the first mistake in each rollout. As a result, the rollout is naturally decomposed into two parts: a correct prefix and an incorrect suffix. Cliff then converts this signal into token-level advantages, assigning positive advantages for the correct prefix and negative feedback afterward. Experiments across 12 different scenarios demonstrate that Cliff consistently improves reasoning performance, outperforming on-policy distillation by 15% and standard GRPO by 7%, even with teachers of modest capability. Furthermore, we analyse the role of ``ground truth'' in Cliff and investigate its training dynamics. These results establish Cliff as a simple, general and effective approach for improving RLVR with richer, fine-grained supervision.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

When Is Noise Response Universal? Tokenization as the Hidden Variable in Language Models

The performance of textual neural models often degrades when their inputs are corrupted by noise such as typos, OCR errors, or dropped words. We study the degradation rate across neural models, both sentence embeddings and decoder-only LLMs, and find that how consistent it is depends on the scale of the noise: under word-level noise, models with very different architectures decline along nearly the same curve, while under character-level noise they separate. We further identify the determining factor to be the training objective, not the architecture: eight encoders spanning six pretraining paradigms are scattered initially, and collapse onto a common curve after a short contrastive training recipe. We trace the word/character split to tokenization: a single character edit forces the tokenizer to re-segment the surrounding word, disturbing the token sequence far more than dropping a whole word does. This finding and its underlying mechanism provide a practical means to predict a model's robustness to noise without any noisy evaluation, and to install robustness at a chosen noise scale through noise-augmented training.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Reflection or Re-Generation? Why LLM Revision Fails Where Human Revision Succeeds

Reflection, the ability to revisit and revise prior reasoning, is central to how humans improve their answers. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly prompted to "reflect," yet whether this resembles human revision remains unclear. We introduce the Human-LLM Reflection Framework (HRF), a controlled two-pass protocol comparing human and LLM revision under identical conditions across self-, peer-, and cross-agent settings. Using an information-theoretic analysis based on per-iteration cross-entropy reduction, we find two failure modes of LLM reflection. On objective tasks with finite answer spaces, reflection yields near-zero information gain (Delta I approx 0), behaving as neutral re-generation indistinguishable from re-sampling. On subjective tasks, it yields significant negative gain (Delta I < 0), moving predictions away from the target. Human revision, by contrast, yields positive gain in both settings. Cross-agent experiments localize the failure to the revision step, not input quality: LLMs degrade even high-quality human responses. Diagnostic analyses (revision conditioned on first-pass correctness, and oracle-guided revision against a random-reshuffle baseline) show that which sub-step dominates varies by task and by model rather than reducing to a single mechanism: self-error detection is present on objective multiple-choice tasks but weak on subjective ones, and recovery under an oracle error signal exceeds the baseline for some models and falls below it for others. The unifying account is structural: without external information, self-conditioned revision cannot reduce uncertainty about the target, so LLM reflection is better understood as conditioned re-generation than as genuine error-driven revision.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Self-Aligned Reward: Towards Effective and Efficient Reasoners

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards has significantly advanced reasoning in large language models (LLMs), but such signals remain coarse, offering only binary correctness feedback. This limitation often results in inefficiencies, including overly verbose reasoning and high computational cost, while existing solutions often compromise accuracy. To address this, we introduce self-aligned reward (SAR), a self-guided signal that complements verifiable rewards to encourage both reasoning accuracy and efficiency. SAR is defined as the relative perplexity difference between an answer conditioned on the query and the standalone answer, thereby favoring responses that are concise and query-specific. Quantitative analysis reveals that SAR reliably distinguishes answer quality: concise, correct answers score higher than redundant ones, and partially correct answers score higher than entirely incorrect ones. Evaluation on 4 models across 7 benchmarks shows that integrating SAR with prevalent RL algorithms like PPO and GRPO improves accuracy by 4%, while reducing inference cost by 30%. Further analysis demonstrates that SAR achieves a Pareto-optimal trade-off between correctness and efficiency compared to reward signals based on length or self-confidence. We also show that SAR shortens responses while preserving advanced reasoning behaviors, demonstrating its ability to suppress unnecessary elaboration without losing critical reasoning. These results highlight the promise of self-aligned reward as a fine-grained complement to verifiable rewards, paving the way for more efficient and effective LLM training.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Declarative Data Pipeline for Large Scale ML Services

Modern distributed data processing systems struggle to balance performance, maintainability, and developer productivity when integrating machine learning at scale. These challenges intensify in large collaborative environments due to high communication overhead and coordination complexity. We present a "Declarative Data Pipeline" (DDP) architecture that addresses these challenges while processing billions of records efficiently. Our modular framework seamlessly integrates machine learning within Apache Spark using logical computation units called Pipes, departing from traditional microservice approaches. By establishing clear component boundaries and standardized interfaces, we achieve modularity and optimization without sacrificing maintainability. Enterprise case studies demonstrate substantial improvements: 50% better development efficiency, collaboration efforts compressed from weeks to days, 500x scalability improvement, and 10x throughput gains.

cs.DC↗

arXiv2025

Effects of Feature Correlations on Associative Memory Capacity

We investigate how feature correlations influence the capacity of Dense Associative Memory (DAM), a Transformer attention-like model. Practical machine learning scenarios involve feature-correlated data and learn representations in the input space, but current capacity analyses do not account for this. We develop an empirical framework to analyze the effects of data structure on capacity dynamics. Specifically, we systematically construct datasets that vary in feature correlation and pattern separation using Hamming distance from information theory, and compute the model's corresponding storage capacity using a simple binary search algorithm. Our experiments confirm that memory capacity scales exponentially with increasing separation in the input space. Feature correlations do not alter this relationship fundamentally, but reduce capacity slightly at constant separation. This effect is amplified at higher polynomial degrees in the energy function, suggesting that Associative Memory is more limited in depicting higher-order interactions between features than patterns. Our findings bridge theoretical work and practical settings for DAM, and might inspire more data-centric methods.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Bag of Tricks for Multimodal AutoML with Image, Text, and Tabular Data

This paper studies the best practices for automatic machine learning (AutoML). While previous AutoML efforts have predominantly focused on unimodal data, the multimodal aspect remains under-explored. Our study delves into classification and regression problems involving flexible combinations of image, text, and tabular data. We curate a benchmark comprising 22 multimodal datasets from diverse real-world applications, encompassing all 4 combinations of the 3 modalities. Across this benchmark, we scrutinize design choices related to multimodal fusion strategies, multimodal data augmentation, converting tabular data into text, cross-modal alignment, and handling missing modalities. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, we distill a collection of effective strategies and consolidate them into a unified pipeline, achieving robust performance on diverse datasets.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

PPLqa: An Unsupervised Information-Theoretic Quality Metric for Comparing Generative Large Language Models

We propose PPLqa, an easy to compute, language independent, information-theoretic metric to measure the quality of responses of generative Large Language Models (LLMs) in an unsupervised way, without requiring ground truth annotations or human supervision. The method and metric enables users to rank generative language models for quality of responses, so as to make a selection of the best model for a given task. Our single metric assesses LLMs with an approach that subsumes, but is not explicitly based on, coherence and fluency (quality of writing) and relevance and consistency (appropriateness of response) to the query. PPLqa performs as well as other related metrics, and works better with long-form Q\&A. Thus, PPLqa enables bypassing the lengthy annotation process required for ground truth evaluations, and it also correlates well with human and LLM rankings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Enhancing GAN-Based Vocoders with Contrastive Learning Under Data-limited Condition

Vocoder models have recently achieved substantial progress in generating authentic audio comparable to human quality while significantly reducing memory requirement and inference time. However, these data-hungry generative models require large-scale audio data for learning good representations. In this paper, we apply contrastive learning methods in training the vocoder to improve the perceptual quality of the vocoder without modifying its architecture or adding more data. We design an auxiliary task with mel-spectrogram contrastive learning to enhance the utterance-level quality of the vocoder model under data-limited conditions. We also extend the task to include waveforms to improve the multi-modality comprehension of the model and address the discriminator overfitting problem. We optimize the additional task simultaneously with GAN training objectives. Our results show that the tasks improve model performance substantially in data-limited settings.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2022

Detecting COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories with Transformers and TF-IDF

The sharing of fake news and conspiracy theories on social media has wide-spread negative effects. By designing and applying different machine learning models, researchers have made progress in detecting fake news from text. However, existing research places a heavy emphasis on general, common-sense fake news, while in reality fake news often involves rapidly changing topics and domain-specific vocabulary. In this paper, we present our methods and results for three fake news detection tasks at MediaEval benchmark 2021 that specifically involve COVID-19 related topics. We experiment with a group of text-based models including Support Vector Machines, Random Forest, BERT, and RoBERTa. We find that a pre-trained transformer yields the best validation results, but a randomly initialized transformer with smart design can also be trained to reach accuracies close to that of the pre-trained transformer.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2021

Multi-modal Ensemble Models for Predicting Video Memorability

Modeling media memorability has been a consistent challenge in the field of machine learning. The Predicting Media Memorability task in MediaEval2020 is the latest benchmark among similar challenges addressing this topic. Building upon techniques developed in previous iterations of the challenge, we developed ensemble methods with the use of extracted video, image, text, and audio features. Critically, in this work we introduce and demonstrate the efficacy and high generalizability of extracted audio embeddings as a feature for the task of predicting media memorability.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2021

OrigamiSet1.0: Two New Datasets for Origami Classification and Difficulty Estimation

Origami is becoming more and more relevant to research. However, there is no public dataset yet available and there hasn't been any research on this topic in machine learning. We constructed an origami dataset using images from the multimedia commons and other databases. It consists of two subsets: one for classification of origami images and the other for difficulty estimation. We obtained 16000 images for classification (half origami, half other objects) and 1509 for difficulty estimation with $3$ different categories (easy: 764, intermediate: 427, complex: 318). The data can be downloaded at: https://github.com/multimedia-berkeley/OriSet. Finally, we provide machine learning baselines.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2021

From Tinkering to Engineering: Measurements in Tensorflow Playground

In this article, we present an extension of the Tensorflow Playground, called Tensorflow Meter (short TFMeter). TFMeter is an interactive neural network architecting tool that allows the visual creation of different architectures of neural networks. In addition to its ancestor, the playground, our tool shows information-theoretic measurements while constructing, training, and testing the network. As a result, each change results in a change in at least one of the measurements, providing for a better engineering intuition of what different architectures are able to learn. The measurements are derived from various places in the literature. In this demo, we describe our web application that is available online at http://tfmeter.icsi.berkeley.edu/ and argue that in the same way that the original Playground is meant to build an intuition about neural networks, our extension educates users on available measurements, which we hope will ultimately improve experimental design and reproducibility in the field.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2020

DIME: An Online Tool for the Visual Comparison of Cross-Modal Retrieval Models

Cross-modal retrieval relies on accurate models to retrieve relevant results for queries across modalities such as image, text, and video. In this paper, we build upon previous work by tackling the difficulty of evaluating models both quantitatively and qualitatively quickly. We present DIME (Dataset, Index, Model, Embedding), a modality-agnostic tool that handles multimodal datasets, trained models, and data preprocessors to support straightforward model comparison with a web browser graphical user interface. DIME inherently supports building modality-agnostic queryable indexes and extraction of relevant feature embeddings, and thus effectively doubles as an efficient cross-modal tool to explore and search through datasets.

cs.MM↗

arXiv2019

Efficient Saliency Maps for Explainable AI

We describe an explainable AI saliency map method for use with deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) that is much more efficient than popular fine-resolution gradient methods. It is also quantitatively similar or better in accuracy. Our technique works by measuring information at the end of each network scale which is then combined into a single saliency map. We describe how saliency measures can be made more efficient by exploiting Saliency Map Order Equivalence. We visualize individual scale/layer contributions by using a Layer Ordered Visualization of Information. This provides an interesting comparison of scale information contributions within the network not provided by other saliency map methods. Using our method instead of Guided Backprop, coarse-resolution class activation methods such as Grad-CAM and Grad-CAM++ seem to yield demonstrably superior results without sacrificing speed. This will make fine-resolution saliency methods feasible on resource limited platforms such as robots, cell phones, low-cost industrial devices, astronomy and satellite imagery.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2018

Cybercasing 2.0: You Get What You Pay For

Under U.S. law, marketing databases exist under almost no legal restrictions concerning accuracy, access, or confidentiality. We explore the possible (mis)use of these databases in a criminal context by conducting two experiments. First, we show how this data can be used for "cybercasing" by using this data to resolve the physical addresses of individuals who are likely to be on vacation. Second, we evaluate the utility of a "bride to be" mailing list augmented with data obtained by searching both Facebook and a bridal registry aggregator. We conclude that marketing data is not necessarily harmless and can represent a fruitful target for criminal misuse.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2018

One Bit Matters: Understanding Adversarial Examples as the Abuse of Redundancy

Despite the great success achieved in machine learning (ML), adversarial examples have caused concerns with regards to its trustworthiness: A small perturbation of an input results in an arbitrary failure of an otherwise seemingly well-trained ML model. While studies are being conducted to discover the intrinsic properties of adversarial examples, such as their transferability and universality, there is insufficient theoretic analysis to help understand the phenomenon in a way that can influence the design process of ML experiments. In this paper, we deduce an information-theoretic model which explains adversarial attacks as the abuse of feature redundancies in ML algorithms. We prove that feature redundancy is a necessary condition for the existence of adversarial examples. Our model helps to explain some major questions raised in many anecdotal studies on adversarial examples. Our theory is backed up by empirical measurements of the information content of benign and adversarial examples on both image and text datasets. Our measurements show that typical adversarial examples introduce just enough redundancy to overflow the decision making of an ML model trained on corresponding benign examples. We conclude with actionable recommendations to improve the robustness of machine learners against adversarial examples.

cs.LG↗