Geng Yuan | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Who Speaks for the Pruned? Visual Token Pruning as Coverage Optimization

Visual token pruning reduces the inference cost of vision-language models (VLMs), but most methods only ask which tokens to keep. This retained-token view can keep redundant high-scoring tokens while leaving discarded evidence without a close representative. We propose CoverPruner, a training-free pruner that asks the complementary demand-side question: after a token is removed, which surviving original token represents it for the target VLM? CoverPruner formulates pruning as Representational Coverage Maximization (RCM), covering the full projected visual-token set with query-weighted demand. It instantiates RCM with projector-space coverage and a lightweight first-layer attention probe. Across multiple VLM architectures and compression rates, CoverPruner achieves the best average accuracy among all compared methods, with the largest gains usually appearing under aggressive compression.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

DART-FL: Burst-Aware Multitask Federated Learning under Dynamic Inference Demand at the Edge

Edge intelligence systems increasingly require model training and online inference to coexist on resource-constrained devices, while inference demand can vary substantially across tasks over time. This creates two coupled challenges: sufficient computation must be reserved for inference to maintain service-level objectives (SLOs), while the remaining training capacity should adapt to task-specific demand so that frequently requested tasks can improve earlier during training. We propose an SLO-aware, demand-driven multitask federated learning framework (DART-FL) that jointly adapts the inference-training resource split and task-level training emphasis. At each scheduling interval, DART-FL uses the inference backlog and profiled service capacity to determine the minimum resource allocation required for inference. The remaining training capacity is then distributed across tasks using a queue-aware DPP-inspired scheduler, and the resulting task allocations are mapped to dynamic loss weights. This allows tasks experiencing higher inference demand to receive greater training emphasis in earlier communication rounds. Clients train a shared backbone with task-specific heads, and the complete multitask model is aggregated through FedAvg. We evaluate DART-FL using Stanford Cars and Oxford Flowers 102 under both synthetic and real Alibaba trace-derived workloads. Results show that DART-FL dynamically adapts the inference-training resource split to time-varying inference demand and shifts the learning progress of high-demand tasks toward their burst periods, improving model accuracy when those tasks are frequently requested while maintaining comparable long-term multitask performance.

cs.LG↗