arXiv subjects

Gaurab Baral

Publications and source records attributed to Gaurab Baral.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

LexFlip: A Dissociation Diagnostic for Legal Meaning Preservation Metrics

Does a simplified legal clause still say what the original said? The checks in current use cannot establish that it does: requiring an identical pair to score highest and an unrelated pair lowest moves lexical overlap and legal force together, so any monotone function of token overlap satisfies both. Our remedy is a dissociation, an item holding surface form fixed while legal force moves. We release LexFlip, 373 minimal perturbations of Quebec statutory French that reverse legal force while preserving 0.93 of the tokens, with a harness scoring metrics, regressors and prompted judges alike. The seven embedding and BERTScore metrics we test spend only 0.022 to 0.039 of their identical-to-unrelated range on such an edit, against 0.670 for bidirectional NLI, the one family the identical-pair check would disqualify. On FrJudge, against a measured human ceiling of r=0.597, a bare length feature outscores every semantic metric and has the lowest margin we measure.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Knowledge Distillation from Large Reasoning Models to Compact Student Models: A Case Study on the John O Bryan Mathematics Competition

This paper investigates knowledge distillation from a large reasoning model (DeepSeek-R1) to a compact student model (Qwen2.5-7B). Using historical problems from the John O'Bryan Mathematics Competition at Northern Kentucky University (2011-2025), we build a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) training corpus through a dual-agent framework. The dataset is used to fine-tune the student model with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) on Apple Silicon hardware using the MLX framework. The base Qwen2.5-7B model achieves 64.67% accuracy on competition problems, while the DeepSeek-R1 teacher achieves 91.40%. An initial 1,000-iteration training run revealed severe overfitting, with validation loss reaching a minimum at iteration 200 before rising steadily. Based on this finding, we ran five independent training runs each limited to 200 iterations with varied random seeds to assess result stability. Across these five runs, the fine-tuned student model achieves a mean accuracy of 69.43% (std dev 0.17%) on the competition dataset, a 4.76 percentage-point improvement over the base model, and generalizes to 73.1% (std dev 0.18%) on the MATH-500 benchmark. We further study how response length affects answer quality across six reasoning levels (R1-R6): accuracy declines consistently from 69.43% at R1 (mean 220 words) to 41.9% at R6 (mean 31.2 words), with the two-person speed section most sensitive to token reduction. These results demonstrate that CoT distillation improves compact student models and that response length is a critical factor in mathematical reasoning quality.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

AutoFormBench: Benchmark Dataset for Automating Form Understanding

Automated processing of structured documents such as government forms, healthcare records, and enterprise invoices remains a persistent challenge due to the high degree of layout variability encountered in real-world settings. This paper introduces AutoFormBench, a benchmark dataset of 407 annotated real-world forms spanning government, healthcare, and enterprise domains, designed to train and evaluate form element detection models. We present a systematic comparison of classical OpenCV approaches and four YOLO architectures (YOLOv8, YOLOv11, YOLOv26-s, and YOLOv26-l) for localizing and classifying fillable form elements. specifically checkboxes, input lines, and text boxes across diverse PDF document types. YOLOv11 demonstrates consistently superior performance in both F1 score and Jaccard accuracy across all element classes and tolerance levels.

cs.CV↗