arXiv subjects

Fucai Zhu

Publications and source records attributed to Fucai Zhu.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

TACIT: Tactile Contact Supervision for Spatial Attention in Dexterous Manipulation

Visuomotor policies trained from a few demonstrations may reproduce demonstrated trajectories without reliably following changes in object position. Existing approaches with explicit attention typically obtain spatial priors from human annotation or visual models. We introduce TACIT (tactile contact informs attention), which uses measured tactile contacts from teleoperated demonstrations to supervise spatial attention without additional point annotation. Gaussian targets over preceding camera point clouds supervise an attention head whose pooled output conditions a visuotactile diffusion policy. Targets are used only during training; tactile observations remain inputs at inference. In the primary real-robot benchmark, with ten demonstrations per task and five demonstrated placement regions, TACIT achieves 66.7% success on ball placement and 73.3% on peg insertion, compared with 10.0% and 20.0% for input-matched 3D visuotactile fusion and 20.0% and 43.3% for vision-only DP3. TACIT enters the 150 mm palm-to-object approach region within 12 seconds in all 30 trials per task; all remaining failures occur after arrival. Across three training seeds on real ball and simulated peg, TACIT outperforms input-matched fusion and an architecture-matched control without explicit attention supervision, supporting the contribution of supervision beyond branch capacity. Pre-contact and contact-time supervision show no consistent ordering. These results demonstrate that measured tactile contact provides effective spatial supervision for approach behavior from few demonstrations within the evaluated workspace.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

ViHaTeleop: A Low-Cost, Lightweight Visual-Haptic Teleoperation System for Dexterous Manipulation Learning

Learning from demonstration is a promising approach for dexterous manipulation, but collecting high-quality contact-critical demonstrations remains difficult with low-cost teleoperation hardware. We present ViHaTeleop, a lightweight (0.7 kg), low-cost (\$550) visual-haptic teleoperation system with SLAM-based wrist tracking, camera-based hand tracking, and finger-wise vibrotactile feedback through Linear Resonant Actuators (LRA). The system includes several design choices (LED illumination, fisheye hand camera, and tactile-aware retargeting constraints) and is deployed on Franka + LEAP Hand + 9DTact in both real and simulated environments. Under matched with/without-haptic conditions with nine participants across six contact-critical tasks, haptics improved success rates across all tasks (+2.2 to +15.6 percentage points), while completion-time effects were task-dependent. Subjective ratings showed significant gains in contact clarity and grasp confidence in both simulation and real-world settings (Wilcoxon signed-rank, $p<0.05$). We also integrate a lightweight depth-camera-based tactile proxy in Isaac Sim, enabling a full pipeline from multi-modal demonstration collection to visual-tactile policy training. Preliminary downstream validation by training visual-tactile policies from collected demonstrations shows tactile cues benefit contact-critical subtasks (peg-in-hole: +17 percentage points over vision-only).

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

UniTacVLA: Unified Tactile Understanding and Prediction in Vision Language Action Models

Vision-language-action (VLA) models have achieved strong performance in many robotic manipulation tasks, yet remain limited in contact-rich dexterous manipulation. To overcome this limitation, recent vision-tactile-language-action (VTLA) methods incorporate tactile sensing into VLA models to provide direct contact information. However, they typically treat tactile signals as passive auxiliary inputs, making it difficult to model tactile semantics and future physical interactions. To this end, we propose a unified tactile learning framework for contact-rich manipulation that models tactile signals as dynamic interaction cues for both contact understanding and prediction. Specifically, we construct a unified tactile latent space and jointly model current tactile states and future contact changes through tactile chain-of-thought reasoning and coarse-to-fine future tactile prediction, thereby forming a state-aware and dynamics-aware tactile prior. Based on this prior, we introduce a tactile-action mixed controller that combines real-time and predicted tactile feedback to refine low-frequency action chunks with high-frequency corrections. Real-world experiments on four categories of contact-rich tasks, including adjustment, insertion, wiping, and assembly, under both clean and externally perturbed settings, show that our method improves success rate, manipulation accuracy, and contact robustness over existing methods, demonstrating its effectiveness in dexterous physical interaction.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

3DThinkVLA: Endowing Vision-Language-Action Models with Latent 3D Priors via 3D-Thinking-Guided Co-training

We propose a 3D-thinking-guided co-training framework that enables vision-language-action (VLA) models to perform 3D spatial reasoning implicitly during action prediction. Our core insight is that 3D geometry perception and 3D spatial reasoning are distinct capabilities that can be disentangled and injected at different feature hierarchies. During training, three tightly coupled components work in concert primarily within the latent space: (1) To gain geometric priors, a latent 3D geometry perception module aligns intermediate visual features with a 3D foundation model, acquiring low-level geometric cues without architectural modifications to the VLM backbone. (2) Complementing this, an online 3D reasoning distillation module mitigates the prompt-induced reasoning gap via a shared reasoning anchor token. During 3D VLM co-training, this anchor is emitted as the first output token to robustly encode spatial priors. During VLA training, it serves as an input token inserted between the task and action instructions, transferring high-level spatial thinking from explicit teacher reasoning prompts to student action prompts without chain-of-thought text generation. (3) These disentangled geometric and reasoning features are then united by a spatially augmented action integration, which jointly injects them into the action-query tokens as hierarchical spatial conditions to prevent action shortcuts. At deployment, our method retains only its lightweight adapters to perform implicit 3D reasoning, discarding the 3D foundation model and the teacher branch used for supervision. Consequently, it operates purely on 2D images without 3D sensors, external models, or explicit text generation while preventing catastrophic forgetting of the pretrained VLM, achieving state-of-the-art performance on LIBERO, LIBERO-PLUS, SimplerEnv, and real-world manipulation tasks.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Touch-R1: Reinforcing Touch Reasoning in MLLMs

While rule-based reinforcement learning has recently catalyzed explicit reasoning in multimodal models, tactile reasoning remains largely underexplored. Existing tactile-language models primarily rely on supervised or contrastive objectives, which limits their capacity to ground predictions in physical evidence or rectify misleading visual priors. Tactile reasoning introduces two modality-specific challenges: the ordinal nature of physical attributes (e.g., hardness, roughness) and the cross-sensor distribution shifts inherent in optical tactile hardware. In this work, we introduce TouchReason-1M, a large-scale multimodal dataset comprising over 1M synchronized tactile pairs across four distinct sensors, and TouchReason-Bench, a rigorous framework for evaluating tactile perception and visual-tactile conflict resolution. Building upon these, we propose Touch-R1, a tactile reasoning MLLM based on Qwen2.5-VL-7B. Touch-R1 is trained via a tactile-grounded GRPO objective that combines ordinal-aware accuracy, cross-sensor physical consistency, structured-format control, and an input-side tactile grounding objective. Specifically, the tactile-use reward assigns credit only when authentic tactile inputs yield superior correctness relative to counterfactual controls where the tactile stream is removed, shuffled, or noise-masked. On TouchReason-Bench, Touch-R1-7B outperforms Octopi-13B by 18.4\% and GPT-4o by 24.7\% on average. Its structured reasoning traces reveal emergent behaviors of probing, comparison, and revision, demonstrating that R1-style reasoning can be effectively grounded in physical contact.

cs.CV↗