arXiv subjects

Frederik Glitzner

Publications and source records attributed to Frederik Glitzner.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Minimax Perspective on Almost-Stable Matchings

Stability is crucial in matching markets, yet in many real-world settings - from hospital residency allocations to roommate assignments - full stability is either unachievable or comes at the cost of leaving agents unmatched. In these cases, algorithmicists and market designers face a critical question: how should instability be measured and distributed among participants? Existing approaches to "almost-stable" matchings focus on aggregate measures, minimising the number of blocking pairs or the count of agents involved in blocking pairs. However, these objectives can result in concentrated instability on a few agents, raising concerns about fairness and incentives to deviate. We introduce a fairness-oriented approach to approximate stability based on the minimax principle: we seek matchings that minimise the maximum number of blocking pairs any agent is in. Equivalently, we minimise the maximum number of agents that anyone has justified envy towards. This distributional objective protects the worst-off agents from bearing a disproportionate amount of instability. We characterise the computational complexity of this notion across fundamental matching settings. Surprisingly, even very modest guarantees with respect to the distribution of instability prove computationally intractable: we show that it is NP-complete to decide whether a matching exists in which no agent is in more than one blocking pair, even when preference lists are bounded. This result applies to both Stable Roommates and maximum cardinality Stable Marriage. On the positive side, we provide polynomial-time algorithms when agents rank at most two others, and present approximation algorithms and integer programs for general settings. Our results map the algorithmic landscape and reveal fundamental trade-offs between distributional guarantees on justified envy and computational feasibility in matching market design.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Near-Feasible Stable Matchings: Incentives and Optimality

Stable matching is a fundamental area with many practical applications, such as centralised clearinghouses for school choice or job markets. Recent work has introduced the paradigm of near-feasibility in capacitated matching settings, where agent capacities are slightly modified to ensure the existence of desirable outcomes. While useful when no stable matching exists, or some agents are left unmatched, it has not previously been investigated whether near-feasible stable matchings satisfy desirable properties with regard to their stability in the original instance. Furthermore, prior works leave open deviation incentive issues that arise when the centralised authority modifies agents' capacities. We consider these issues in the Stable Fixtures problem model, which generalises many classical models through non-bipartite preferences and capacitated agents. We develop a formal framework to analyse and quantify agent incentives to adhere to computed matchings. Then, we embed near-feasible stable matchings in this framework and study the trade-offs between instability, capacity modifications, and computational complexity. We prove that capacity modifications can be simultaneously optimal at individual and aggregate levels, and provide efficient algorithms to compute them. We show that different modification strategies significantly affect stability, and establish that minimal modifications and minimal deviation incentives are compatible and efficiently computable under general conditions. Finally, we provide exact algorithms and experimental results for tractable and intractable versions of these problems.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Structural and Algorithmic Results for Stable Cycles and Partitions in the Roommates Problem

In the Stable Roommates problem, we seek a stable matching of the agents into pairs, in which no two agents have an incentive to deviate from their assignment. It is well known that a stable matching is unlikely to exist, but a stable partition always does and provides a succinct certificate for the unsolvability of an instance. Furthermore, apart from being a useful structural tool to study the problem, every stable partition corresponds to a stable half-matching, which has applications, for example, in sports scheduling and time-sharing. We establish new structural results for stable partitions and show how to enumerate all stable partitions and the cycles included in such structures efficiently. We also adapt optimality criteria from stable matchings to stable partitions and give complexity and approximability results for the problems of computing such "fair" and "optimal" stable partitions. Through this research, we contribute to a deeper understanding of stable partitions from a combinatorial point of view, as well as the computational complexity of computing "fair" or "optimal" stable half-matchings in practice, closing the gap between integral and fractional stable matchings and paving the way for further applications of stable partitions to unsolvable instances and computationally hard stable matching problems.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Unsolvability and Beyond in Many-To-Many Non-Bipartite Stable Matching

We study the Stable Fixtures problem, a many-to-many generalisation of the classical non-bipartite Stable Roommates matching problem. Building on the foundational work of Tan on stable partitions, we extend his results to this significantly more general setting and develop a rich framework for understanding stable structures. Our main contribution, the notion of a generalised stable partition (GSP), not only characterises the solution space but also serves as a versatile tool for ordinal preference systems with capacity constraints. We show that a GSP can be computed efficiently and can provide an elegant representation of key aspects of a preference system. Leveraging a connection to stable half-matchings, we also establish an analogous Rural Hospitals Theorem for stable half-matchings and GSPs, and connect our results to recent work on near-feasible matchings, providing a simpler algorithm and tighter analysis. Our work also addresses the computational challenges of finding optimal stable half-matchings and GSPs, presenting a flexible integer linear programming model for various objectives. Beyond theoretical insights, we conduct the first empirical analysis of random Stable Fixtures instances. Our work unifies and extends classical and recent perspectives on stability in non-bipartite stable matching and establishes new tools and techniques for stable matchings and their applications.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Stable Matching with Deviators and Conformists

In the Stable Marriage and Stable Roommates problems, there are inherent trade-offs between the size and stability of solutions. While in the former problem, a stable matching always exists and can be found efficiently using the Gale-Shapley algorithm, the existence of a stable matching is not guaranteed in the latter problem, but can be determined efficiently using Irving's algorithm. However, the computation of matchings that minimise the instability, either due to the presence of constraints on the size of the matching or due to restrictive preference cycles, gives rise to a collection of infamously intractable almost-stable matching problems. In practice, however, not every agent is able or likely to initiate deviations caused by blocking pairs. Suppose we knew, for example, due to a set of requirements or estimates based on historical data, which agents are likely to initiate deviations - the deviators - and which are likely to comply with whatever matching they are presented with - the conformists. Can we decide efficiently whether a matching exists in which no deviator is blocking, i.e., in which no deviator has an incentive to initiate a deviation? Furthermore, can we find matchings in which only a few deviators are blocking? We characterise the computational complexity of this question in bipartite and non-bipartite settings. Surprisingly, these problems prove intractable in very strong ways. On the positive side, we identify polynomial-time and fixed-parameter tractable cases (with respect to the number of deviators and the preference list length), providing novel algorithmics for problems where stability cannot be fully guaranteed, and resolving some open cases from the literature along the way.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

Designing Pairwise-Stable Agent Seating Arrangements

Many fundamental problems in multi-agent systems involve the arrangement of agents, who have preferences over each other, on a target graph. These problems include, for example, Stable Matching, Seat Arrangement, and Coalition Formation. However, guaranteeing game-theoretically desirable properties such as exchange-stability or envy-freeness is difficult, as such solutions may not exist, and even if they do, they are often intractable to find, even in highly constrained settings such as path or cycle target graphs. In this paper, we challenge the classical setup and investigate what can be achieved when the structure of the target graph is a designable object for the central planner, rather than a fixed part of the input. We study this in the context of a natural pairwise stability criterion, which is similar to having spare seats. In particular, we introduce a highly flexible framework to efficiently design approximately optimal target graphs and associated pairwise-stable agent arrangements. Our model assumes that agents have (weak or strict) ordinal preferences over other agents. We show that classical results from stable matching theory can be extended and adapted to this much more general setting and can serve as a useful tool for navigating the trade-off between stability and computational efficiency. Our results highlight strict boundaries between tractability and intractability, and between local and global optimality. We also uncover intriguing connections to classical computational problems such as subgraph isomorphism, disjoint path partitioning, and bin-packing.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Weakly-Popular and Super-Popular Matchings with Ties and Their Connection to Stable Matchings

The efficient computation of large matchings with desirable guarantees is a crucial objective in market design. However, even in simple two-sided matching markets with weak ordinal preferences, finding a maximum-size stable matching is NP-hard. Alternatively, popular matchings can be of larger size, but their existence is not guaranteed. In this paper, we study a new definition of popularity with two-sided weak preferences, where agents are only indifferent between two matchings if they receive the same partner. We show that this alternative definition of popularity, which we call weak popularity, guarantees the existence of such matchings. Unfortunately, finding a maximum-size weakly popular matching turns out to be NP-hard even with one-sided ties. However, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to find a weakly popular matching that has at least $\frac{3}{4}$ times the size of a maximum-size weakly popular matching. We complement our approximation results with an Integer Linear Programming formulation that solves the maximum-size weakly popular matching problem exactly. We evaluate our algorithms on both randomly generated and real-world instances. Our experiments demonstrate that weakly popular matchings can be significantly larger than stable matchings, often covering all agents. Furthermore, we show that our approximation algorithm performs nearly optimally in practice. Finally, we show that maximum-size weakly popular matchings can have very few blocking edges, suggesting that weak popularity offers a desirable trade-off between size and stability. We also study a model more general than weak popularity, where for each edge, we can specify for both agents the size of improvement the agent needs to vote in favor of a new matching. We show that even in this more general model, a so-called $γ$-popular matching always exists, and our approximation algorithm applies.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Perspectives on Unsolvability in the Roommates Problem

In the well-studied Stable Roommates problem, we seek a stable matching of agents into pairs, where no two agents prefer each other over their assigned partners. However, some instances of this problem are unsolvable, lacking any stable matching. A long-standing open question posed by Gusfield and Irving (1989) asks about the behavior of the probability function Pn, which measures the likelihood that a random instance with n agents is solvable. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the landscape surrounding this question, combining structural, probabilistic, and experimental perspectives. We review existing approaches from the past four decades, highlight connections to related problems, and present novel structural and experimental findings. Specifically, we estimate Pn for instances with preferences sampled from diverse statistical distributions, examining problem sizes up to 5,001 agents, and look for specific sub-structures that cause unsolvability. Our results reveal that while Pn tends to be low for most distributions, the number and lengths of "unstable" structures remain limited, suggesting that random instances are "close" to being solvable. Additionally, we present the first empirical study of the number of stable matchings and the number of stable partitions that random instances admit, using recently developed algorithms. Our findings show that the solution sets are typically small. This implies that many NP-hard problems related to computing optimal stable matchings and optimal stable partitions become tractable in practice, and motivates efficient alternative solution concepts for unsolvable instances, such as stable half-matchings and maximum stable matchings.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2024

MATWA: A Web Toolkit for Matching under Preferences

Matching markets, where agents are assigned to one another based on preferences and capacity constraints, are pervasive in various domains. This paper introduces MATWA (https://matwa.optimalmatching.com), a web application offering a rich collection of algorithms for fundamental problem models involving matching under preferences. MATWA provides results and visualizations of matching algorithm outputs based on different methods for providing problem instances. In this paper, we describe the features of the system, illustrating its usage for different problem models, and outlining the algorithm implementations that are supported. We also give evidence of usability testing and illustrate how the system was used to obtain new empirical results for a specific matching problem. MATWA is intended to be a resource for the community of researchers in the area of matching under preferences, supporting experimentation as well as aiding the understanding of matching algorithms.

cs.DS↗