arXiv subjects

Fallou Faye

Publications and source records attributed to Fallou Faye.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

On the exponential Diophantine equation $\left(P_{n}^{(k)}\right)^{x}+\left(P_{r}^{(k)}\right)^{x}=P_{m}^{(k)}$

The Pell numbers satisfy $P_n^2+P_{n+1}^2=P_{2n+1}$, and Bravo, Luca and Pomeo recently found all the cases in which the sum of the $x$-th powers of two consecutive $k$-generalized Pell numbers is again a $k$-generalized Pell number. We ask what happens when the two indices are arbitrary, that is, we solve $\big(P_n^{(k)}\big)^x+\big(P_r^{(k)}\big)^x=P_m^{(k)}$ in positive integers $k\ge2$, $n\ge r$, $m$ and $x$. The answer is that nothing new appears: apart from $1^x+1^x=2$, every solution has consecutive indices. The proof combines linear forms in logarithms with an auxiliary Fibonacci equation which does not depend on $k$, and, for large $k$, with the fact that the dominant root of the sequence is very close to $φ^2$. For the reduction step, the method of Dujella and Pethő fails for large indices and has to be replaced by a criterion of Legendre type.

math.NT↗

arXiv2026

On the exponential Diophantine equation $\left(P_{n+1}^{(k)}\right)^{x}-\left(P_{n-1}^{(k)}\right)^{x}=2P_{m}^{(k)}$

For the Pell numbers one has $P_{n+1}-P_{n-1}=2P_n$ and $P_{n+1}^2-P_{n-1}^2=2P_{2n}$. We look for all the solutions of $\big(P_{n+1}^{(k)}\big)^x-\big(P_{n-1}^{(k)}\big)^x=2P_m^{(k)}$ in positive integers $k\ge2$, $n$, $m$, $x$, where $P^{(k)}$ is the $k$-generalized Pell sequence. We prove that for $k=2$ the two identities above give all the solutions, and that for $k\ge3$ the only solutions are $(n,m,x)=(1,1,1),(1,2,2),(2,2,1)$. In contrast with the analogous equation for $k$-generalized Fibonacci numbers, there are no parametric families of solutions. The proof uses an auxiliary equation with Fibonacci numbers which does not depend on $k$, Matveev's lower bound for linear forms in logarithms, the reduction of Dujella and Pethő, and, for large $k$, the fact that the dominant root of $P^{(k)}$ is very close to $φ^2$.

math.NT↗