arXiv subjects

Fagner Cunha

Publications and source records attributed to Fagner Cunha.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

PuTR-CouT: Counting-by-Tracking in Camera-Trap Image Sequences

Species identification in camera trap images has been widely studied, but key ecological modeling tasks such as species abundance or density estimation also require counting individual animals. However, the lack of counting labels in most datasets and low frame rates (typically ~1 frame per second) make sequence-level tracking and count estimation particularly challenging. In this work, we present PuTR-CouT, a counting-by-tracking framework built on a transformer-based learned association mechanism for sequence-level animal counting in camera trap images. To address the scarcity of annotated tracking data, we generate synthetic training data by exploiting structural priors, such as static backgrounds and short temporal bursts, to heuristically create pseudo-tracking labels in a weakly supervised manner. The resulting tracker associates detections across frames, using these tracks to estimate per-species counts. We also refine the MaxBoxCount heuristic used by the top solutions of the iWildCam 2021 challenge as a strong baseline, setting the highest score reported to date. When evaluated on the iWildCam 2021 benchmark, our framework PuTR-CouT delivers competitive counting results compared to the improved MaxBoxCount, with the added capability of multi-species predictions and track-level verification.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Counting Animals in Camera-Traps Image Sequences without Count Labels: Winning Solution to the iWildCam 2021 Challenge

Camera traps have become an essential tool for wildlife monitoring, motivating the development of computer vision methods for the automated extraction of information from these data. While most prior work has focused on species identification, many ecological applications also require estimating the number of unique individuals appearing across short image sequences. This task is particularly challenging because camera traps typically acquire bursts of images at approximately one frame per second, creating large temporal discontinuities that may make conventional multi-object tracking methods unreliable, and because manually collecting individual count annotations is prohibitively expensive. In this work, we describe the winning solution to the iWildCam 2021 Challenge, which introduced a benchmark for counting animals at the sequence level under realistic annotation constraints where count annotations are unavailable for training. Our approach, MaxBoxCount, combines a strong species classification pipeline with a simple yet effective counting heuristic based on MegaDetector detections to estimate the number of unique individuals without requiring count annotations. Code is available at https://github.com/alcunha/iwildcam2021ufam.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

Insect Identification in the Wild: The AMI Dataset

Insects represent half of all global biodiversity, yet many of the world's insects are disappearing, with severe implications for ecosystems and agriculture. Despite this crisis, data on insect diversity and abundance remain woefully inadequate, due to the scarcity of human experts and the lack of scalable tools for monitoring. Ecologists have started to adopt camera traps to record and study insects, and have proposed computer vision algorithms as an answer for scalable data processing. However, insect monitoring in the wild poses unique challenges that have not yet been addressed within computer vision, including the combination of long-tailed data, extremely similar classes, and significant distribution shifts. We provide the first large-scale machine learning benchmarks for fine-grained insect recognition, designed to match real-world tasks faced by ecologists. Our contributions include a curated dataset of images from citizen science platforms and museums, and an expert-annotated dataset drawn from automated camera traps across multiple continents, designed to test out-of-distribution generalization under field conditions. We train and evaluate a variety of baseline algorithms and introduce a combination of data augmentation techniques that enhance generalization across geographies and hardware setups.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2024

A machine learning pipeline for automated insect monitoring

Climate change and other anthropogenic factors have led to a catastrophic decline in insects, endangering both biodiversity and the ecosystem services on which human society depends. Data on insect abundance, however, remains woefully inadequate. Camera traps, conventionally used for monitoring terrestrial vertebrates, are now being modified for insects, especially moths. We describe a complete, open-source machine learning-based software pipeline for automated monitoring of moths via camera traps, including object detection, moth/non-moth classification, fine-grained identification of moth species, and tracking individuals. We believe that our tools, which are already in use across three continents, represent the future of massively scalable data collection in entomology.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2023

Bag of Tricks for Long-Tail Visual Recognition of Animal Species in Camera-Trap Images

Camera traps are a method for monitoring wildlife and they collect a large number of pictures. The number of images collected of each species usually follows a long-tail distribution, i.e., a few classes have a large number of instances, while a lot of species have just a small percentage. Although in most cases these rare species are the ones of interest to ecologists, they are often neglected when using deep-learning models because these models require a large number of images for the training. In this work, a simple and effective framework called Square-Root Sampling Branch (SSB) is proposed, which combines two classification branches that are trained using square-root sampling and instance sampling to improve long-tail visual recognition, and this is compared to state-of-the-art methods for handling this task: square-root sampling, class-balanced focal loss, and balanced group softmax. To achieve a more general conclusion, the methods for handling long-tail visual recognition were systematically evaluated in four families of computer vision models (ResNet, MobileNetV3, EfficientNetV2, and Swin Transformer) and four camera-trap datasets with different characteristics. Initially, a robust baseline with the most recent training tricks was prepared and, then, the methods for improving long-tail recognition were applied. Our experiments show that square-root sampling was the method that most improved the performance for minority classes by around 15%; however, this was at the cost of reducing the majority classes' accuracy by at least 3%. Our proposed framework (SSB) demonstrated itself to be competitive with the other methods and achieved the best or the second-best results for most of the cases for the tail classes; but, unlike the square-root sampling, the loss in the performance of the head classes was minimal, thus achieving the best trade-off among all the evaluated methods.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2021

Filtering Empty Camera Trap Images in Embedded Systems

Monitoring wildlife through camera traps produces a massive amount of images, whose a significant portion does not contain animals, being later discarded. Embedding deep learning models to identify animals and filter these images directly in those devices brings advantages such as savings in the storage and transmission of data, usually resource-constrained in this type of equipment. In this work, we present a comparative study on animal recognition models to analyze the trade-off between precision and inference latency on edge devices. To accomplish this objective, we investigate classifiers and object detectors of various input resolutions and optimize them using quantization and reducing the number of model filters. The confidence threshold of each model was adjusted to obtain 96% recall for the nonempty class, since instances from the empty class are expected to be discarded. The experiments show that, when using the same set of images for training, detectors achieve superior performance, eliminating at least 10% more empty images than classifiers with comparable latencies. Considering the high cost of generating labels for the detection problem, when there is a massive number of images labeled for classification (about one million instances, ten times more than those available for detection), classifiers are able to reach results comparable to detectors but with half latency.

cs.CV↗