arXiv subjects

Ethan Hsu

Publications and source records attributed to Ethan Hsu.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

MC$^2$: Monte Carlo Correction for Fast Elliptic PDE Solving

Partial differential equation (PDE) solvers underpin scientific computing, but real-world deployment is bounded by compute. Classical Monte Carlo solvers such as Walk-on-Spheres (WoS) are unbiased and geometry-agnostic but are slow. Learned solvers are fast but biased and brittle under distribution shift. We present \textbf{MC$^2$}, a hybrid WoS-Neural Network (WoS-NN) PDE solver that treats a low-budget Monte Carlo solution as a structured estimator of the true field and learns a single-pass neural correction to recover a high-fidelity solution. MC$^2$ matches the accuracy of solutions using over $1000\times$ more Monte Carlo compute, outperforming all evaluated classical, denoising, and neural-operator baselines. To enable reproducible study of finite-compute PDE solving, we additionally release \textbf{PDEZoo}, the largest standardized elliptic PDE benchmark to date: 2M PDEs spanning five elliptic families and unlimited geometric compositions, with analytic ground truth and multi-budget Monte Carlo trajectories. Together \textbf{MC$^2$} and \textbf{PDEZoo} (1) empirically establish that finite-sample Monte Carlo error is structured, learnable, and correctable in a single forward pass, (2) show that we can solve PDEs $\sim$\textbf{1000x} faster than with just WoS, and (3) provide the evaluation infrastructure the field has so far lacked.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

The Double-Edged Nature of the Rashomon Set for Trustworthy Machine Learning

Real-world machine learning (ML) pipelines rarely produce a single model; instead, they produce a Rashomon set of many near-optimal ones. We show that this multiplicity reshapes key aspects of trustworthiness. At the individual-model level, sparse interpretable models tend to preserve privacy but are fragile to adversarial attacks. In contrast, the diversity within a large Rashomon set enables reactive robustness: even when an attack compromises one model, a practitioner can switch to a different near-optimal model that remains accurate, without retraining. However, the same diversity increases information leakage, as disclosing more near-optimal models provides an attacker with progressively richer views of the training data. This produces a robustness-privacy trade-off governed by diversity, which we analyze theoretically and empirically. Beyond this trade-off, Rashomon sets are stable under small distribution shifts, so a set computed once remains valid under such shifts without re-computation. Our results highlight the dual role of Rashomon sets as both a resource and a risk for trustworthy ML.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Exploring the Rashomon Set for Concept-Based Models

In many machine learning problems, there may exist multiple models that achieve nearly identical predictive performance while relying on fundamentally different internal logic. However, standard training procedures produce a single model, offering no practical way to explore alternatives that may better suit downstream needs. The set of these equally accurate models is known as the Rashomon set. Exploring the Rashomon set is particularly challenging in large and complex hypothesis spaces, such as Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs), which are widely used in computer vision to make predictions through intermediate, human-understandable concepts. In this paper, we provide a method for efficiently exploring the Rashomon set of CBMs. Our framework introduces a specialized parallel adapter-based construction, combined with a checkpointing scheme and a concept diversity objective, to generate multiple equally accurate CBMs from a single training process. Empirical results show that our method finds models with better diversity than baselines while using much less memory. We further demonstrate that access to these diverse yet accurate CBMs enables trustworthy model selection, resolution of inter-class confusion, and reliable abstention in decision-making.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

WebDS: An End-to-End Benchmark for Web-based Data Science

Many real-world data science tasks involve complex web-based interactions: finding appropriate data available on the internet, synthesizing multimodal data from different locations, and producing summarized analyses. Existing web benchmarks often focus on simplistic interactions and often do not require diverse tool-using capabilities. Conversely, traditional data science benchmarks typically concentrate on static, highly structured datasets and do not assess end-to-end workflows that encompass data acquisition, cleaning, analysis, and insight generation. In response, we introduce WebDS, the first end-to-end web-based data science benchmark. It comprises 870 web-based data science tasks across 29 diverse websites from structured government data portals to unstructured news media, challenging agents to perform complex, multi-step, tool-based operations, across heterogeneous data formats, to better reflect the realities of modern data analytics. Evaluations of current SOTA LLM agents indicate significant performance gaps in accomplishing these tasks. For instance, Browser Use, which accomplishes $80\%$ of tasks on WebVoyager, completes only 15% of tasks in WebDS, which our analysis suggests is due to new failure modes, such as poor information grounding, repetitive behavior and shortcut-taking that agents performing WebDS's tasks display. By contrast, humans achieve around 90% accuracy, highlighting a substantial gap between current agents and human performance. By providing a more robust and realistic testing ground, WebDS sets the stage for significant advances in the development of practically useful LLM-based data science.

cs.CL↗