Espedito Rusciano | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Using Automated Vehicles Operational Data to Confirm Safety and Anticipate Threats

European Union (EU) policymakers adopted revolutionary data collection provisions for Automated Driving Systems (ADS) in the recently approved regulation that allows driverless vehicles to be operated on public roads. The framework is inspired by best practices developed at the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe(UNECE) level: the In-Service Monitoring and Reporting (ISMR); and by similar operational data collection regulatory approaches in nuclear energy production and transportation fields. The collection of real-world data will enable the competent safety authorities to gather the information needed to confirm the homologation safety target. Safety-relevant driving scenarios discovered during the real-world operation of a given ADS can also be stored in a scenario catalogue to investigate how other ADS types might have addressed such a traffic conflict. Moreover, lessons learnt deriving from the data collected can be shared among original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and safety authorities. Ultimately, the ISMR is recognised as a necessary tool to properly tackle the challenges associated with ADS safety assessment given the number of unknowns that might remain undisclosed by leveraging the traditional homologation validation scheme only.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Virtual Testing of Automated Driving Systems through Credible Simulations

Simulation is increasingly used to support safety-related decision-making in road transport, particularly for the assessment and approval of automated driving systems (ADS). The complexity of ADS behavior and size of their operational design domains make exclusive reliance on physical testing impractical, leading to extensive use of virtual testing (VT) during the approval phase. This shift raises critical questions regarding the credibility of modelling and simulation (M&S) results used to support road safety decisions. Current VT accreditation approaches in the ADS domain typically rely on validation-only practices, which have been shown to scale poorly when applied to complex, multi-tool simulation environments. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a risk-based framework for assessing the credibility of simulation toolchains used in ADS safety evaluation, drawing inspiration from established practices in other safety-critical domains, notably NASA's STD-7009 for models and simulations. The framework extends traditional verification and validation (V&V) by explicitly linking credibility requirements to the intended use of simulation outputs and to the safety criticality of the decisions they support within the approval process. It provides a lifecycle-oriented assessment scheme integrating toolchain management, modelling assumptions and limitations, verification, validation, and sensitivity analysis. Credibility acceptance thresholds are defined proportionally, allowing differentiated requirements depending on whether simulation is used for exploratory safety analysis, partial decision support, or as a substitute for physical testing. While demonstrated for ADS, the proposed approach is directly applicable to road safety and simulation studies where VT plays a central role in safety assessment and regulatory decision-making.

cs.RO↗