arXiv subjects

Eric Vansteenberghe

Publications and source records attributed to Eric Vansteenberghe.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Quantitative Methods in Finance

These lecture notes provide a comprehensive introduction to Quantitative Methods in Finance (QMF), designed for graduate students in finance and economics with heterogeneous programming backgrounds. The material develops a unified toolkit combining probability theory, statistics, numerical methods, and empirical modeling, with a strong emphasis on implementation in Python. Core topics include random variables and distributions, moments and dependence, simulation and Monte Carlo methods, numerical optimization, root-finding, and time-series models commonly used in finance and macro-finance. Particular attention is paid to translating theoretical concepts into reproducible code, emphasizing vectorization, numerical stability, and interpretation of outputs. The notes progressively bridge theory and practice through worked examples and exercises covering asset pricing intuition, risk measurement, forecasting, and empirical analysis. By focusing on clarity, minimal prerequisites, and hands-on computation, these lecture notes aim to serve both as a pedagogical entry point for non-programmers and as a practical reference for applied researchers seeking transparent and replicable quantitative methods in finance.

econ.EM↗

arXiv2025

Monetary Policy, Uncertainty, and Credit Supply

This paper investigates how dispersion in banks' subjective inflation forecasts is a channel of the transmission of monetary policy to credit supply. We extend the Monti-Klein model of monopolistic banking by incorporating risk aversion, subjective beliefs, and ambiguity aversion. The model predicts that greater inflation uncertainty or asymmetry in beliefs raises equilibrium loan rates and amplifies credit rationing. Using AnaCredit loan-level data for France, we estimate finite-mixture density regressions that allow for latent heterogeneity in loan pricing. Empirically, we find that higher subjective uncertainty and asymmetry both increase average lending rates and skew their distribution, disproportionately affecting financially constrained firms in the right tail. Quantitatively, moving from the 25th to the 75th percentile of our indicators raises average borrowing costs by more than 10 basis points, which translates into roughly 0.5 billion euros of additional annual interest expenses for non-financial corporations. By contrast, forecast disagreement has a weaker and less systematic effect. Taken together, these results show that uncertainty and asymmetry in inflation expectations are independent and powerful drivers of credit conditions, underscoring their importance for understanding monetary policy transmission through the banking sector.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2024

Uncertain and Asymmetric Forecasts

Measures of inflation uncertainty and directional risk derived from higher moments of forecast distributions are contaminated by the first moment, but in distinct ways. Using individual density forecasts from the ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters, this paper shows that 42% of the variation in raw forecast variance reflects the distance of expected inflation from target, a mechanical level effect, while raw asymmetry is too noisy to identify directional risk without reference to the central forecast. We propose two complementary corrections. Normalized Uncertainty (NU) purges dispersion of its predictable component linked to the policy anchor, recovering genuine belief imprecision. Asymmetry Coherence (AC) extracts directional risk only when asymmetry aligns with the central forecast, formalizing the balance of risks. These corrections alter inference. In a replication of Barro (1995), the volatility effect on growth disappears once level contamination is removed, while the inflation-level coefficient regains significance. In a VAR, the sign of the policy response reverses: raw asymmetry suggests easing, whereas coherent upside risk predicts tightening. In the credit channel, higher uncertainty slows and weakens pass-through from policy easing to loan pricing, especially at longer maturities. A division of roles emerges: NU governs transmission, AC informs policy response. Higher moments are informative only when measurement separates macroeconomic signals from first-moment contamination.

econ.GN↗