arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Eric L. Sandquist

Publications and source records attributed to Eric L. Sandquist.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Wide-Field CCD Photometry of the Globular Cluster M30

We present new VI photometry for the halo globular cluster M30 (NGC 7099), and compute luminosity functions (LFs) in both bands for samples of about 15,000 hydrogen-burning stars from near the tip of the red giant branch (RGB) to over four magnitudes below the main-sequence (MS) turnoff. We confirm previously observed features of the LF that are at odds with canonical theoretical predictions: an excess of stars on subgiant branch (SGB) approximately 0.4 mag above the turnoff and an excess number of RGB stars relative to MS stars. Based on subdwarfs with Hipparcos-measured parallaxes, we compute apparent distance moduli of (m-M)_{V} = 14.87+/-0.12 and 14.65+/-0.12 for reddenings of E(V-I)=0.06 and 0.02 respectively. The implied luminosity for the horizontal branch (HB) at these distances is M_V(HB)=0.11 and 0.37 mag. The two helium indicators we have been able to measure (R and Delta) both indicate that M30's helium content is high relative to other clusters of similar metallicity. M30 has a larger value for the parameter Delta V_{TO}^{HB} than any of the other similarly metal-poor clusters for which this quantity can be reliably measured. This suggests that M30 has either a larger age or higher helium content than all of the other metal-poor clusters examined. The color-difference method for measuring relative ages indicates that M30 is coeval with the metal-poor clusters M68 and M92.

astro-ph↗

Double Core Evolution X. Through the Envelope Ejection Phase

The evolution of binary systems consisting of an asymptotic giant branch star of mass equal to 3 M_sun or 5 M_sun, and a main sequence star of mass equal to 0.4 M_sun or 0.6 M_sun with orbital periods > 200 days has been followed from the onset through the late stages of the common envelope phase. Using a nested grid technique, the three-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations of an asymptotic giant branch star with radii approximately 1 A.U. indicate that a significant fraction of the envelope gas is unbound (about 31% and 23% for binaries of 3 M_sun and 0.4 M_sun, and 5 M_sun and 0.6 M_sun respectively) by the ends of the simulations, and that the efficiency of the mass ejection process is about 40%. While the original volume of the giant is virtually evacuated in the late stages, most of the envelope gas remains marginally bound on the grid. At the ends of our simulations, when the orbital decay timescale exceeds about 5 years, the giant core and companion orbit one another with a period of about 1 day (2.4 days for a binary involving a more evolved giant), although this is an upper limit to the final orbital period. For a binary of 5 M_sun and 0.4 M_sun, the common envelope may not be completely ejected.

astro-ph↗

Composition Mixing during Blue Straggler Formation and Evolution

We use smoothed-particle hydrodynamics to examine differences between direct collisions of single stars and binary star mergers in their roles as possible blue straggler star formation mechanisms. We find in all cases that core helium in the progenitor stars is largely retained in the core of the remnant, almost independent of the type of interaction or the central concentration of the progenitor stars. We have also modelled the subsequent evolution of the hydrostatic remnants, including mass loss and energy input from the hydrodynamical interaction. The combination of the hydrodynamical and hydrostatic models enables us to predict that little mixing will occur during the merger of two globular cluster stars of equal mass. In contrast to the results of Proctor Sills, Bailyn, & Demarque (1995), we find that neither completely mixed nor unmixed models can match the absolute colors of observed blue stragglers in NGC 6397 at all luminosity levels. We also find that the color distribution is probably the crucial test for explanations of BSS formation - if stellar collisions or mergers are the correct mechanisms, a large fraction of the lifetime of the straggler must be spent away from the main sequence. This constraint appears to rule out the possibility of completely mixed models. For NGC 6397, unmixed models predict blue straggler lifetimes ranging from about 0.1 to 4 Gyr, while completely mixed models predict a range from about 0.6 to 4 Gyr.

astro-ph↗

CCD Photometry of the Globular Cluster M5. I. The Color-Magnitude Diagram and Luminosity Functions

We present new BVI photometry for the halo globular cluster M5, and examine the B- and I-band luminosity functions (LFs), based on over 20,000 stars. We do not see evidence in the LF of a ``subgiant excess'' or of a discrepancy in the relative numbers of stars on the red-giant branch and main sequence, both of which have been claimed in more metal-poor clusters. Inclusion of alpha-element enhancements improves the agreement between the observed and predicted positions of the ``red-giant bump''. Using the ΔV_{TO}^{HB} method, we conclude that the clusters M5, Palomar 5, M4, NGC 288, NGC 362, NGC 1261, NGC 1851 and NGC 2808 are the same age at the level of about 1.5 Gyr, with the possible exception of NGC 288 (older by 3.5\pm 1.5 if the reddest NGC 288 HB stars are on the zero-age horizontal branch). Even with NGC 288 set aside, the large range in HB morphology in the remaining clusters appears to eliminate age as the sole second parameter determining HB morphology in the case of constant mass loss between RGB and HB. We are unable to chose between the two competing values for M5's (absolute) metallicity: [Fe/H] = -1.40 (Zinn & West 1984) and -1.17 (Sneden et al. 1992). This level of discrepancy has a signifcant effect on the derivation of the distance modulus and absolute age of M5. From theoretical isochrones and luminosity functions, we find an absolute age for M5 of 13.5 \pm 1 Gyr (internal error, assuming perfect models and no [M/H] error) for the Zinn & West abundance scale and 11 \pm 1 Gyr for the higher abundance value.

astro-ph↗