arXiv subjects

Emily Yang

Publications and source records attributed to Emily Yang.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

When Does AI Augment Work? A Workflow-Level Framework for Human-Agent Collaboration

We aim to characterise the value of artificial intelligence in the workplace. Current studies largely measure this value in terms of the current automation capabilities and public adoption of AI. However, such metrics ignore the greater impacts of human--agent collaboration in transforming the nature of work. To account for this, we must expand the scope of our analysis beyond atomised tasks of today, and instead focus on how AI can augment entire workflows of the future. To ground this analysis, we establish a precise definition of AI augmentation comprising six conditions, spanning durable net value, meaningful human control, accountability and recovery, and long-term human development through learning, career pathways, and job purpose. We elaborate on these conditions and apply the framework in a case study of AI-mediated social surveys. We conclude by outlining how organisations, researchers, and government leaders can use this framework to make sense of the future of work.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Robust and Efficient Feature Extraction for Spike Sorting via the Walsh-Hadamard Transform

Implantable neural interfaces require low-power real-time signal processing to remain within strict thermal and bandwidth constraints, motivating lightweight feature extraction methods for on-chip spike sorting. This work presents the Walsh-Hadamard Transform (WHT) as a hardware-efficient feature extraction method for neural spike classification. WHT can be implemented using only adders, subtractors, and registers without coefficient memory. WHT performance is compared against the Compressed Hadamard Transform (CHT) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), improving mean F1-scores from 55-60% to 70-75% on difficult high-noise datasets and from 90-95% to 95-99% on all other simulated datasets. In addition to improved classification performance, WHT demonstrates greater robustness to noise, downsampling, reduced training size, and distance metric selection, maintaining standard deviations typically below 5%, while CHT and PCA reach up to 10% under high-noise conditions.

eess.SP↗