arXiv subjects

Emil Dimanchev

Publications and source records attributed to Emil Dimanchev.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Optimal climate policy in incomplete electricity markets

Incomplete long-term contracting in electricity markets can expose investors and consumers to inefficient levels of risk. This paper investigates how incompleteness impacts the optimal choice of climate policy. We develop a game-theoretic model of optimal policy-making in anticipation of how electricity market agents react to a given policy when gas prices and demand are uncertain and contracting is incomplete. In illustrative experiments, we observe that renewable subsidies and carbon prices induce an insurance co-benefit when markets are incomplete. This is because, relative to a complete market benchmark, incompleteness shifts investment from renewables toward gas and exposes consumers to uninsured risk from inter-annual volatility in electricity prices. By incentivizing investment in renewables, subsidies and carbon prices indirectly counteract these distortions. Consequently, incompleteness increases the optimal subsidy and carbon price levels in our experiments. Renewable subsidies exhibit a stronger insurance effect than carbon pricing, as the latter leads to more investment in gas with carbon capture and storage and more volatile electricity prices. While carbon pricing is more economically efficient than subsidies in complete markets, incompleteness shrinks its efficiency advantage and even leads to cases where subsidies are more economically efficient.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2026

Uncertainty-Aware Grid Planning in the Real World: A Method Enabling Large-Scale, Two-Stage Adaptive Robust Optimization for Capacity Expansion Planning

Capacity expansion models are frequently used to inform multi-billion dollar grid infrastructure decisions, a context in which there is significant uncertainty surrounding the future need for and performance of such infrastructure. However, despite much academic literature on the topic, virtually no grid planning processes use capacity expansion models that endogenously consider uncertainty, an oversight which frequently leads to short-sighted infrastructure decisions. This is partially due to a technology transfer gap, but it is also due to a lack of methods that work at large scale. In this paper we introduce a method for endogenizing uncertainty into capacity expansion models, a variant of adaptive robust optimization, that addresses this gap. We apply the method to a real-world capacity expansion planning problem, that of the State of California, and compare its performance to that of traditional adaptive robust optimization. We find that both the traditional method and our method identify increased transmission investment as a key lever for increasing robustness and adaptability, while helping to avoid downside risks that current deterministic planning processes may be exposing ratepayers to. Our method performs similarly to the traditional method in terms of outcomes, while significantly reducing computational complexity, making it scalable to real-world planning problems.

eess.SY↗

arXiv2025

Are EVs Cleaner Than We Think? Evaluating Consequential Greenhouse Gas Emissions from EV Charging

While electrifying transportation eliminates tailpipe greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, electric vehicle (EV) adoption can create additional electricity sector emissions. To quantify this emissions impact, prior work typically employs short-run marginal emissions or average emissions rates calculated from historical data or power systems models that do not consider changes in installed capacity. In this work, we use an electricity system capacity expansion model to consider the full consequential GHG emissions impact from large-scale EV adoption in the western United States, accounting for induced changes in generation and storage capacity. We find that the metrics described above do not accurately reflect the true emissions impact of EV adoption-average emissions rates can either under- or over-estimate emission impacts, and short-run marginal emissions rates can significantly underestimate emission reductions, especially when charging timing is flexible. Our results also show that using short-run marginal emission rates as signals to coordinate EV charging could increase emissions relative to price-based charging signals, indicating the need for alternative control strategies to minimize consequential emissions.

eess.SY↗