arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Elise L. Han

Publications and source records attributed to Elise L. Han.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Reconciling Privacy with Provenance for Language Model Watermarks

Watermarking has great potential for regulating the use of language models (LMs), but its deployment has been marred by controversy, as many users argue that fine-grained tracking of LM usage violates their privacy. This tension reduces the effectiveness of watermarks, as users engage in evasion strategies such as paraphrasing that can remove much of the watermark signal. We show that provenance and privacy can be reconciled if we shift the goal of watermark design from tracking individuals to estimating aggregate usage. We develop locally differentially private watermarks which provably limit the evidence that any individual text can contribute to detection, while still enabling accurate estimation of population frequencies. We introduce the Red-Green Sequence (RGS) watermark, a private and computationally efficient watermark that achieves accurate frequency estimation at high privacy levels across various models, sample sizes and generation entropies in settings that reflect realistic deployment scenarios. On C4 language modeling tasks, we attain $0.0019$ MSE with $0.0038$ mean absolute bias at a low $\varepsilon$ of 1, while in more challenging settings such as an essay writing task with only 100 text samples, we still find errors on the order of $0.0113$ MSE with $0.004$ mean absolute bias at $\varepsilon=2$.

cs.CR↗

Reliable AI-Assisted Decisions via Selective Auditing

We consider online monitoring of an AI system that produces a sequence of decisions. At each round, the system outputs a proposed decision together with a confidence score estimating the trustworthiness of the decision. The decision and confidence score need not be produced by the same model: for example, one agent may propose a decision, while a separate verifier agent evaluates it and outputs a correctness or safety score. Based on this information, we must decide whether to accept the AI decision automatically or consult an expert, such as a human auditor, who reviews the proposal and either accepts or corrects it. We formulate this task as an online constrained optimization problem in which the goal is to minimize the frequency of expert auditing while guaranteeing that the fraction of AI errors that go unaudited stays below a user-defined threshold. We derive a family of algorithms with provable error-control guarantees with no assumptions, including a method that is optimally efficient: it asymptotically attains the best achievable auditing rate for both adversarial and i.i.d. data streams. Experiments on screening harmful requests to large language models, qualitative text annotation, and data labeling show that our methods achieve valid error control in practice while substantially reducing the need for human auditing compared to baselines.

stat.ML↗