arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Eitetsu Ken.
In this technical note, we show that the relativized bounded arithmetic $T^{1}_{2}(R)$ equipped with $UCP(\Delta^{b}_{1}(R))$ cannot prove $injPHP^{n+1}_{n}(R)$. The result partially supports [K, 2024] Conjecture 1.
We give another proof of ordinal analysis of $I\Sigma_{k}$-fragments of Peano Arithmetic which is free from cut-elimination of $\omega$-logic. Our main tool is a direct witnessing argument utilizing game notion, motivated from the realm of proof complexity and bounded arithmetic.
We introduce a pebble game extended by backtracking options for one of the two players (called Prover) and reduce the provability of the pigeonhole principle for a generic predicate $R$ in the bounded arithmetic $T^2_2(R)$ to the existence of a particular kind of winning strategy (called oblivious) for Prover in the game. While the unprovability of the said principle in $T^2_2(R)$ is an immediate consequence of a celebrated theorem of Ajtai (which deals with a stronger theory $T_2(R)$), up-to-date no methods working for $T^2_2(R)$ directly (in particular without switching lemma) are known. Although the full analysis of the introduced pebble game is left open, as a first step towards resolving it, we restrict ourselves to a simplified version of the game. In this case, Prover can use only two pebbles and move in an extremely oblivious way. Besides, a series of backtracks can be made only once during a play. Under these assumptions, we show that no strategy of Prover can be winning.
In this paper, we consider interpolation by \textit{completely monotonous} polynomials (CMPs for short), that is, polynomials with non-negative real coefficients. In particular, given a finite set $S\subset \mathbb{R}_{>0} \times \mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$, we consider \textit{the minimal polynomial} of $S$, introduced by Berg [1985], which is `minimal,' in the sense that it is eventually majorized by all the other CMPs interpolating $S$. We give an upper bound of the degree of the minimal polynomial of $S$ when it exists. Furthermore, we give another algorithm for computing the minimal polynomial of given $S$ which utilizes an order structure on sign sequences. Applying the upper bound above, we also analyze the computational complexity of algorithms for computing minimal polynomials including ours.
In [Mulmuley, 1987], Mulmuley gave an algorithm reducing the computation of the matrix rank function to that of determinants, of which the proof for the verification is elementary. In this article, we formalize this argument in the bounded arithmetic $LAP$; that is, we show that \[\det(AB)=\det(A)\det(B)\] for matrices $A,B$ with $mathbb{F}(X)$-coefficients implies \[rank(M)=dim(im M),\] where $\mathbb{F}$ is the universe of the field-sort of the theory, $M$ is a matrix with $\mathbb{F}$-coefficients, and $rank(M)$ is the rank function computed by Mulmuley's algorithm. Furthermore, interpreting $LAP$ by $VNC^{2}$ with $\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{Q}$ and using the result of [Tzameret \& Cook, 2021], we see that $VNC^{2}$ can formalize $rank(M)$ and prove $rank(M)=dim(im M)$. Lastly, we give several examples of combinatorial statements provable in $VNC^{2}$, using the formalized linear algebra.
We formalize various counting principles and compare their strengths over $V^{0}$. In particular, we conjecture the following mutual independence between: (1) a uniform version of modular counting principles and the pigeonhole principle for injections, (2) a version of the oddtown theorem and modular counting principles of modulus $p$, where $p$ is any natural number which is not a power of $2$, (3) and a version of Fisher's inequality and modular counting principles. Then, we give sufficient conditions to prove them. We give a variation of the notion of $PHP$-tree and $k$-evaluation to show that any Frege proof of the pigeonhole principle for injections admitting the uniform counting principle as an axiom scheme cannot have $o(n)$-evaluations. As for the remaining two, we utilize well-known notions of $p$-tree and $k$-evaluation and reduce the problems to the existence of certain families of polynomials witnessing violations of the corresponding combinatorial principles with low-degree Nullstellensatz proofs from the violation of the modular counting principle in concern.
When we investigate a type system, it is helpful if we can establish the well-foundedness of types or terms with respect to a certain hierarchy, and the Extended Calculus of Constructions (called $ECC$, defined and studied comprehensively in [Luo,1994]) is no exception. However, under a very natural hierarchy relation (called the cumulativity relation in [Luo,1994]), the well-foundedness of the hierarchy does not hold generally. In this article,we show that the cumulativity relation is well-founded if it is restricted to one of the following two natural families of terms: \begin{enumerate} \item types in a valid context \item terms having normal forms \end{enumerate} Also, we give an independent proof of the existence of principal types in $ECC$ since it is used in the proof of well-foundedness of cumulativity relation in a valid context although it is often proved by utilizing the well-foundedness of the hierarchy, which would make our argument circular if adopted.
Temperature of combinatorial games have been long studied since when Conway established the modern combinatorial game theory, and there are several variations of the concepts. In this article, we focus on one of the classical versions of temperature, and give precise proofs to the fundamental claims on temperature, namely, the existence, order-preservation, and homomorphism. Besides, a general relationship between the value and the thermograph of a game is investigated.