Donglian Qi | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

DenseScout: Algorithm-System Co-design for Budgeted Tiny Object Selection on Edge Platforms

Deploying high-resolution tiny-object perception on edge platforms requires not only accurate localization, but also selecting a small set of informative patches under compute, transport, and latency constraints. We study budgeted tiny-object selection, where a frontend ranks patch centers from a lightweight proxy and a downstream detector processes only the selected regions. DenseScout is a 1.01M-parameter deployment-oriented dense-response selector that removes detector-style box regression and directly optimizes ranked patch-center prioritization. Its contribution lies in the task-specific selector formulation, the alignment among output representation, supervision, and decoding, and its joint design with transport-aware execution and QoS-oriented evaluation. Under unified protocols on VisDrone and DOTA, DenseScout provides stronger low-budget recall than the evaluated detector-derived selectors; controlled fixed-K inspection experiments further demonstrate advantages over selection-style proxy baselines. Cross-platform profiling on Jetson Orin NX and RK3588 shows that deployable utility depends jointly on selector quality, memory movement, and heterogeneous runtime realization. These results support treating edge tiny-object perception as a selection-and-deployment co-design problem rather than evaluating model accuracy and runtime in isolation.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

OmniEdit-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-based Video Editing

Instruction-based video editing (IVE) is an emerging field with broad applications, yet evaluating editing models remains challenging. Existing benchmarks suffer from two major limitations: limited task coverage inherited from image editing, which overlooks video-specific dimensions, and inadequate metrics that fail to measure instruction fidelity, allowing incorrect edits to receive high scores due to strong visual priors from the original video. To address these issues, we introduce a comprehensive and structured benchmark for IVE. Our benchmark decomposes editing tasks into multiple video-specific dimensions, including spatial, temporal, audio, and reference-based editing, extending beyond conventional frame-level evaluation. It also distinguishes explicit and implicit instructions and incorporates reasoning-based scenarios to better reflect real-world requirements. Furthermore, we propose an evaluation framework that assesses editing quality from four complementary dimensions: accuracy, preservation, realism, and consistency, using both human judgments and state-of-the-art vision-language models. To emphasize instruction fidelity, we introduce an accuracy-aware penalty mechanism that conditions other scores on accuracy, preventing visually plausible but incorrect edits from receiving inflated evaluations. Extensive experiments on representative open-source and commercial models show that current IVE models remain far from satisfactory. OmniEdit-Bench provides a comprehensive and reliable testbed for evaluating instruction-based video editing and offers insights into future research directions. The project page is https://omniedit-bench.github.io/.

cs.CV↗