arXiv subjects

Dongho Yee

Publications and source records attributed to Dongho Yee.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Recording Hand-Held Laparoscopic Instrument Motion in the Operating Room: Magnetometer-Free Fusion of Inertial, Range and Visual Sensing

Most minimally invasive procedures are still performed with hand-held laparoscopic instruments, yet only the endoscopic video is retained; the instrument motion that expresses surgical skill, and that could support skill assessment and robot learning, is lost. Pose from video alone remains millimeters to centimeters off, and an instrument-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) cannot rely on its magnetometer, whose field changed with tool pose and between sessions in our measurements. We present a surgical instrument-state logger that clips onto a conventional instrument without modifying the part that enters the patient and fuses a six-axis IMU and a time-of-flight (ToF) rangefinder with a markerless camera in an error-state Kalman filter under the remote center of motion (RCM) of the trocar. Heading comes from the shaft silhouette, segmented by a U-Net, in place of the magnetometer: the rotation-angle error is 0.200°, against 3.58° from the accelerometer and magnetometer alone. Against a Franka Research 3 manipulator, and without alignment to it, the displacement error over 300 translation trials was 1.21mm RMS and the relative-rotation error over 180 rotation trials 0.34° RMS. On continuous trajectories, tracked and displayed in real time, the absolute tip error was 1.22mm (programmed) and 3.04mm (teleoperated) after post-hoc tuning of three filter parameters, and the full fusion beat every sensor subset. Because the estimator uses no magnetic measurement, its accuracy does not rely on an undisturbed field. The same clip-on device could thus record metric tip trajectories during routine hand-held laparoscopy, while displaying the insertion depth and attitude that are hidden once the instrument is inside the patient.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

From Instrument-Mounted Demonstrations to In-Vivo Execution: Learning Bimanual Laparoscopic Appendectomy Without Robot-Collected Demonstrations

Most minimally invasive surgery is still performed with hand-held laparoscopic instruments, and the surgeon's instrument kinematics are lost when the operation ends; only the endoscope video is kept. This paper presents an end-to-end pipeline that captures this motion in the operating room and uses it to train a surgical robot policy, validated on live animals. We introduce a surgical instrument-state logger that mounts on the shaft of a standard laparoscopic instrument and recovers its pose and jaw state from an inertial sensor, a time-of-flight sensor and a Hall sensor, with no external camera or tracker. A data pipeline measures the latency of every sensor channel against a robot ground truth and aligns the channels before forming observation-action pairs. On these demonstrations we train a diffusion policy with a fine-tuned DINOv3 backbone, selecting its design by closed-loop rollouts in a physics simulator reconstructed from depth maps of an ex-vivo rabbit appendix. The policy is then retrained on 849 in-vivo demonstrations from four live rabbits and deployed on four additional live rabbits with electrosurgery armed. With the surgeon selecting the surgical phase, the policy completed the appendectomy in three of the four animals. The results show that demonstrations recorded from a surgeon's own instruments are sufficient to train, select and deploy a bimanual surgical policy in vivo. The robot serves only as the timing reference for sensor calibration and as the executor, and collects no demonstrations. Both demonstration corpora are released to support future surgical robot learning research.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Contact-Stable Deformable Tissue Simulation Using Implicit Integration and Live-Pose Grasp Constraints for Laparoscopic Surgery Robot Policy Evaluation

Closed-loop evaluation of surgical robots requires tissue that deforms, can be grasped and lifted, and reproduces the anatomy in which the robot will operate. We present a simulator in which this tissue is reconstructed from a fixed-view RGB-D recording of the surgical field, composited to remove the instruments, closed into watertight volumes and tetrahedralised; the pipeline was applied unchanged to three specimens of two species (thirteen organs, 146,061 tetrahedra, no inverted elements). For one specimen, the organs are placed in a bimanual cell in which two Franka FR3 arms operate motorised instruments through 6 mm trocars. The core contribution is the numerical and contact design that keeps this cell stable: implicit integration, simulation meshes separate from collision meshes, numerical guards, and a grasp constraint captured at the live tissue pose. In 45 repeated grasp-lifts, a friction grasp held the tissue in 0 of 15 trials and each constraint grasp in 13 of 15; on displaced tissue, a rest-pose constraint produced one-step snaps of up to 17.8 mm, which live-pose capture eliminates. Against the recording, front-surface depth error is 1.33 to 1.41 mm, organ silhouette IoU is 0.80, and in five grasp-lifts reproduced from video the landmark displacement RMSE is 11.8 mm against 14.2 mm for a static prediction. Biofidelity is not claimed; the environment is intended for closed-loop feasibility, safety, contact and policy screening.

cs.RO↗