arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Dong Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Dong Wang.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Learning to Track from Privileged Target Appearances

Target templates define what a visual tracker searches for, yet the templates available at inference trade off localization certainty with appearance freshness: the initial ground-truth template is exact but becomes stale, whereas recent templates better reflect the current appearance but are cropped from uncertain predictions. We quantify this bottleneck with a non-deployable oracle that supplies an exact current-frame target crop, improving AUC on LaSOT by 15.2 percentage points. This gap reveals a training-only opportunity: frame-level ground truths provide exact current- and future-frame target crops, although such crops are unavailable at deployment. We introduce Privileged Appearance Transfer for Tracking (PATT), a teacher-student training framework that transfers these privileged appearances to a deployable tracker through multi-level representation prediction. The privileged teacher observes exact target crops from past, current, and future frames, whereas the student receives only past-frame templates and learns to predict the teacher's search representations. To avoid transferring unreliable teacher signals, PATT weights this transfer by the teacher's relative localization advantage over the student and its absolute localization accuracy. After training, the teacher, latent predictor, reliability weights, and privileged crops are removed, leaving standard student-only inference. Across seven benchmarks at two model scales, PATT achieves consistent gains under both long- and short-term tracking protocols.

cs.CV

PropUQ-MAS: Propagation-Aware Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Multi-Agent Systems

LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) solve complex tasks through communication among role-specialized agents. However, inter-agent dependencies introduce reliability risks beyond isolated agent failures. For instance, errors in intermediate messages could be inherited and amplified by downstream agents. Existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods mainly target isolated responses or single-agent reasoning, and therefore fail to capture uncertainty propagation in MAS. To this end, we propose PropUQ-MAS, an error propagation-aware UQ framework that represents MAS execution as a communication-structured graph and estimates each step's reliability by combining local uncertainty with uncertainty inherited from upstream messages. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PropUQ-MAS consistently improves UQ in MAS, with average relative gains of +6.10% in AUROC and +47.58% in PRR.

cs.MA

Rubric-to-Code Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning

Interactive web application generation requires models to produce usable HTML, CSS, and JavaScript applications from natural language requests. Unlike conventional code generation, application quality depends on multiple user-facing functional requirements, each often tied to localized code regions such as event handlers, state updates, DOM fragments, or CSS selectors. Standard GRPO collapses these structured outcomes into a single sequence-level reward and applies the resulting advantage uniformly to all tokens, weakening credit assignment. We propose \textbf{Rubric-to-Code Credit Assignment} (RCCA), a reinforcement learning framework that converts rubric-level functional feedback into localized optimization signals over generated code. RCCA builds training tasks around explicit functional rubrics, uses a hierarchical reward to separate format, source-code, runtime, and functional failures, and aligns evaluator-generated textual attributions with responsible code spans and generated tokens. The resulting model, \textbf{Ling-RCCA-Flash}, scores 41.25 on MiniAppBench, improving Ling-3.0-Flash by 32.20 points and slightly surpassing Claude Opus 4.5. It also reaches 76.19 on ArtifactsBench, improving the SFT model by 4.48 points and establishing a new top score under the official ArtifactsBench leaderboard setting by surpassing the GPT-5 score by 3.64 points, suggesting transferable implementation-level gains.

cs.AI

PhyGile: Physics-Prefix Guided Motion Generation for Agile General Humanoid Motion Tracking

Humanoid robots are expected to execute agile and expressive whole-body motions in real-world settings. Existing text-to-motion generation models are predominantly trained on captured human motion datasets, whose priors assume human biomechanics, actuation, mass distribution, and contact strategies. When such motions are directly retargeted to humanoid robots, the resulting trajectories may satisfy geometric constraints (e.g., joint limits and pose continuity) and appear kinematically reasonable. However, they frequently violate the physical feasibility required for real-world execution. To address these issues, we present PhyGile, a unified framework that closes the loop between robot-native motion generation and General Motion Tracking (GMT). PhyGile performs physics-prefix-guided robot-native motion generation at inference time, directly generating robot-native motions in a 262-dimensional skeletal space with physics-guided prefixes, thereby eliminating inference-time retargeting artifacts and reducing generation-execution discrepancies. Before physics-prefix adaptation, we train the GMT controller with a curriculum-based mixture-of-experts scheme, followed by post-training on unlabeled motion data to improve robustness over large-scale robot motions. During physics-prefix adaptation, the GMT controller is further fine-tuned with generated objectives under physics-derived prefixes, enabling agile and stable execution of complex motions on real robots. Extensive offline and real-robot experiments demonstrate that PhyGile expands the frontier of text-driven humanoid control, enabling stable tracking of agile, highly difficult whole-body motions that go well beyond walking and low-dynamic motions typically achieved by prior methods.

cs.RO

Beyond Truth Discovery: A Two-Stage Framework to Assess the Severity of False Claim during Disasters

False information spreads rapidly on social media during disasters and can undermine emergency response efforts, public trust, and crisis communication. Existing research primarily focuses on determining whether social media posts contain false information, but provides limited insight into the specific false claims embedded within posts and the severity of individual false claims. To address the limitations, we propose a two-stage framework to assess the severity of false claims during disasters. In the first stage, we develop a false claim extraction agent that identifies false claims from multimodal social media posts containing text, images, videos, and links. A subsequent verification step validates extracted claims with supporting evidence. In the second stage, we define false claim severity as the combination of two complementary dimensions: believability, which determines the likelihood that a claim will be believed, and harmfulness, which captures the potential consequences if it is believed. Human annotators assess both dimensions to construct a claim-level severity benchmark using false claims extracted from Reddit posts related to hurricanes and wildfires. Building upon this benchmark, we investigate false claim severity assessment as a human-AI alignment problem, evaluating whether models can reproduce human judgments under a shared evaluation rubric rather than merely predicting severity labels. Experiments on the benchmark show that traditional supervised models exhibit limited alignment with human judgments, whereas Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve substantially stronger performance. Among the evaluated strategies, in-context learning consistently achieves the strongest alignment with human judgments, highlighting the importance of human examples and shared decision criteria for severity assessment.

cs.SI