arXiv subjects

Dipto Sumit

Publications and source records attributed to Dipto Sumit.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Inherited or Learned? Backdoor Selectivity in Distilled Language Models

Distillation is a routine step in building small language models, and a backdoored teacher can pass its backdoor to the student. We study what a student inherits when the backdoor is a rare string that triggers a fixed refusal. Keeping the trigger fixed, we vary only where it appears, at a random word boundary or appended to the instruction, and compare teachers and students on the exact trigger, six control strings and clean inputs. Across Qwen2.5, Llama 3.2 and Gemma 3, with 5% of transfer prompts triggered, randomly inserted triggers become less selective after distillation in all nine teacher-student pipelines, while appended triggers gain selectivity in Qwen and Llama and change little in Gemma. Students trained on the same prompts without a teacher show that much of this is not inherited. Llama and Gemma students learn an appended backdoor from the 150 poisoned examples alone, and only Qwen's 0.5B student needs the teacher. The data also sets where the trigger works. Gemma teachers respond to it anywhere, but their students only when it is appended. Audits should compare teacher and student on the same inputs, probe several trigger positions and include a student trained without the teacher.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Reading Between the Chapters: A Graph-Free RAG Rebuilt With AI and Human Feedback

Many questions about a book can only be answered by connecting passages chapters apart, such as a cough heard three times across a horse's life. We introduce CrossChapterQA, 1,853 such questions over 14 public-domain books. Each question lists the two to six chapters it needs (spanning half the book at the median) and the relation linking them, cites evidence from each, and has two independent reference answers graded blind. We use it to build LadderRAG, which indexes a book as passages, summaries and book-level cards for about $0.41 and answers a question for under a cent. Its first version failed mostly at retrieval. We redesigned it four times, steered by an LLM judge's verdicts and our analyses of failed answers: a design-level counterpart of RLAIF and RLHF in which feedback changes the architecture, not model weights. We also report the two redesigns that made answers worse. On the 191 questions its first version got wrong, the final version retrieves over twice as many required chapters on held-out books (recall 0.36 to 0.79), and ten annotators rate its answers 6.5/10 on average (764 ratings).

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

A Token Is Not a Unit of Difficulty: Segmentation Controls Where Adaptive Computation Goes Inside a Word

Early-exit language models decide for each token how much computation to spend, usually by stopping once the prediction is confident. Yet a token is not a fixed unit: tokenizers cut words into different numbers of pieces in different languages. We ask where inside a word such a policy spends its budget. In Qwen3, along two adaptive axes (the timesteps of a spiking conversion and the layers of the original Transformer), confidence stopping gives the continuation pieces of a word less computation than its first piece in English, German, and Turkish, but more in Bangla. Segmentation drives this. Re-segmenting the same parallel passages with BPE-dropout shifts the gap by up to eight exits on both axes, small models trained under two tokenizers shift Bangla's gap by six exits, and BLOOM and mGPT, which split Bangla less finely, give it the English pattern. Characters per token do not predict the gap across languages; within-word surprisal explains 75% of its variance. A learned stopping head beats confidence stopping by 7 to 8 points, but gains less than one point over the best mix of fixed exits at equal cost, and sometimes loses. All results come from offline analysis, not measured speedups.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Temperature, Not Knowledge: What Recursive Self-Training and Its Remedies Do to a Language Model's Confidence

Recursive self-training can collapse language models, and many proposed remedies target overconfidence, yet their effects on confidence are rarely measured. We study a five-round self-training loop on Qwen3-1.7B, using three seeds per compared method, and distinguish confidence temperature (drift from a calibrated starting point) from discrimination (ranking correct answers above incorrect ones). Accuracy and overall discrimination remain nearly unchanged, but confidence sharpens and the most confident answers become less reliable. Matching predictive entropy to the calibrated starting model each round recalibrates nearly as well as label-based temperature fitting, at both 1.7B and 8B. Sharpening is not inherent to self-training: exact samples from a model's distribution have zero expected gradient. Instead, most drift comes from fitting each generated answer twice, with top-p truncation contributing the rest; removing both keeps entropy on generated outputs flat. Remedies affect the two properties differently: truncated cross-entropy, an entropy bonus, and single-pass training preserve temperature without improving discrimination, while focal loss and multi-sample targets improve discrimination but cause underconfidence. Reference-data mixing also overshoots. Pairing a ranking-improving loss with label-free recalibration achieves both.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Label Smoothing in Disguise? Gated Knowledge Distillation for Low-Resource Bangla Generation

Gated knowledge distillation (KD) weights teacher signals per token or example, aiming to trust an imperfect teacher only where it seems reliable. We test two gates: EWAD (entropy-weighted agreement-aware distillation), which gates tokens by teacher confidence, and CHAD (counterfactual harm-aware distillation), which gates examples by gradient alignment with validation data. Across six Bangla-centric tasks, three student models (60M to about 2B parameters), and two teacher families, no gate significantly improves plain KD in 45 comparisons. KD also fails to beat cross-entropy (CE) fine-tuning on gold outputs in 40 single-seed comparisons or three-seed runs on four tasks; CE leads on every summarisation metric. The main benefit of KD is regularisation: over ten fixed epochs, CE students lose 0.030 to 0.044 token-F1 from their early-stopped checkpoint, versus 0.005 to 0.025 for distilled students. Teacher-free label smoothing closes most of this gap. In one comparison, a teacher 0.29 token-F1 worse yields students at most 0.009 worse. Thus, gating may change regularisation strength but has little teacher knowledge to select. Findings are limited to Bangla-centric tasks and small students. We will release code, data splits, predictions, and scores.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Benchmarking Bengali Dialectal Bias: A Multi-Stage Framework Integrating RAG-Based Translation and Human-Augmented RLAIF

Large language models (LLMs) frequently exhibit performance biases against regional dialects of low-resource languages. However, frameworks to quantify these disparities remain scarce. We propose a two-phase framework to evaluate dialectal bias, operationalized as comprehension degradation relative to standard Bengali, in LLM question-answering across nine Bengali dialects. First, we translate and gold-label standard Bengali questions into dialectal variants adopting a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline to prepare 4,000 question sets. Since traditional translation quality evaluation metrics fail on unstandardized dialects, we evaluate fidelity using an LLM-as-a-judge, which human correlation confirms outperforms legacy metrics. Second, we benchmark 19 LLMs across these gold-labeled sets, running 68,395 RLAIF evaluations validated through multi-judge agreement and human fallback. Our findings reveal severe performance drops linked to linguistic divergence. For instance, responses to the highly divergent Chittagong dialect score 5.44/10, compared to 7.68/10 for Tangail. Furthermore, increased model scale does not consistently mitigate this bias. We contribute a validated translation quality evaluation method, a rigorous benchmark dataset, and a Critical Bias Sensitivity (CBS) metric for safety-critical applications.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Below the Noise Floor: Bimodal Seed Collapse and Distinct Failure Modes in Small-Model Knowledge Distillation

Function routing -- selecting the correct API call from a fixed catalog given a natural-language request -- is a deployment problem where small students are attractive but knowledge distillation gains are typically reported single-seed, at scales where seed variance is unknown. On a 740-instance healthcare API routing task with a 1.5B Qwen student and a 20B teacher, we compare eight KD variants against supervised cross-entropy, using three to six seeds for key configurations. We find: (i) per-seed standard deviation ranges from 2.8 to 48.7 percentage points, swallowing every claimed KD gain below five points; (ii) three of seven KD variants exhibit bimodal collapse, with at least one in three to five seeds falling below 55% accuracy while the others train normally, and a fourth showing elevated variance; (iii) collapse has distinct modes -- wrong-function selection for ce_kd and ce_paraphrase, and a previously undocumented output-truncation mode for reasoning_kd, where the model emits reasoning but terminates before producing a function name (0.9% accuracy); (iv) only progressive_kd and rank_kd avoid collapse across observed seeds, with sigma <= 3.9 pp; (v) a naive cross-split +3.78 pp gain from input enrichment reverses to -2.70 pp under controlled within-split multi-seed re-testing. Single-seed evaluation is therefore unable to detect central failure modes in small-model KD.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

When Does Knowledge Distillation Hurt? Reliability-Aware Distillation for Low-Resource Language Summarization

Knowledge distillation (KD) is a standard approach for compressing sequence-to-sequence models, but its per-sample effects are rarely examined. On the BanSum Bangla summarization benchmark, we find that standard KD improves ROUGE-L by only +0.0003 over a cross-entropy baseline, and that approximately 51.3% of training samples are estimated to actively harm student validation loss under standard KD. We propose two complementary reliability-aware distillation methods. CHAD (Counterfactual Harm-Aware Distillation) measures per-sample KD usefulness via gradient alignment with the validation loss direction and trains a lightweight gate that generalizes this counterfactual judgment to the full training set. EWAD+CPDP combines token-level entropy-weighted adaptive distillation with a capacity-proportional geometric constraint from a second, vocabulary-incompatible teacher. On BanSum, both methods substantially outperform standard KD: CHAD by +0.0173 ROUGE-L and EWAD+CPDP by +0.0219 ROUGE-L, where standard KD itself improves ROUGE-L by only +0.0003; despite using only 60M parameters, both outperform a fine-tuned Qwen 2.5-3B model (50x larger). We further evaluate the stronger method, EWAD+CPDP, across 15 typologically diverse XL-Sum languages organised into three sets, beating the CE-only baseline on 10/15 languages; gains are most reliable where the two teachers contribute complementary signal, and weakest where they have saturated or jointly weak target-language coverage. We release code and trained models to support reproducibility and further research on selective distillation.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Reliability Gated Multi-Teacher Distillation for Low Resource Abstractive Summarization

We study multiteacher knowledge distillation for low resource abstractive summarization from a reliability aware perspective. We introduce EWAD (Entropy Weighted Agreement Aware Distillation), a token level mechanism that routes supervision between teacher distillation and gold supervision based on inter teacher agreement, and CPDP (Capacity Proportional Divergence Preservation), a geometric constraint on the student position relative to heterogeneous teachers. Across two Bangla datasets, 13 BanglaT5 ablations, and eight Qwen2.5 experiments, we find that logit level KD provides the most reliable gains, while more complex distillation improves semantic similarity for short summaries but degrades longer outputs. Cross lingual pseudo label KD across ten languages retains 71-122 percent of teacher ROUGE L at 3.2x compression. A human validated multi judge LLM evaluation further reveals calibration bias in single judge pipelines. Overall, our results show that reliability aware distillation helps characterize when multi teacher supervision improves summarization and when data scaling outweighs loss engineering.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

A Comparative Analysis of Retrieval-Augmented Generation Techniques for Bengali Standard-to-Dialect Machine Translation Using LLMs

Translating from a standard language to its regional dialects is a significant NLP challenge due to scarce data and linguistic variation, a problem prominent in the Bengali language. This paper proposes and compares two novel RAG pipelines for standard-to-dialectal Bengali translation. The first, a Transcript-Based Pipeline, uses large dialect sentence contexts from audio transcripts. The second, a more effective Standardized Sentence-Pairs Pipeline, utilizes structured local\_dialect:standard\_bengali sentence pairs. We evaluated both pipelines across six Bengali dialects and multiple LLMs using BLEU, ChrF, WER, and BERTScore. Our findings show that the sentence-pair pipeline consistently outperforms the transcript-based one, reducing Word Error Rate (WER) from 76\% to 55\% for the Chittagong dialect. Critically, this RAG approach enables smaller models (e.g., Llama-3.1-8B) to outperform much larger models (e.g., GPT-OSS-120B), demonstrating that a well-designed retrieval strategy can be more crucial than model size. This work contributes an effective, fine-tuning-free solution for low-resource dialect translation, offering a practical blueprint for preserving linguistic diversity.

cs.CL↗