Dinil Mon Divakaran | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Drishti: AI-Led Human-Directed Vulnerability Auditing for 5G Cores

Candidate generation for open-source vulnerabilities is no longer scarce. AI-assisted code review now produces defect candidates cheaply, and industry programs pair them with expert human triage. The remaining scarcity is validation and impact assessment, and the gap is largest in critical-infrastructure software like 5G cores. Here, validation has four costs: verification, reachability, impact, and fix-completeness. We present Drishti, an AI-led human-directed vulnerability audit framework with four components, one per cost: (i) an anti-pattern catalog for verification, (ii) critical-path triage for reachability, (iii) concentric validation for impact, and (iv) patch-review for fix-completeness. Across audits of Open5GS and free5GC, Drishti produced three findings. The first is a pre-authentication NULL-dereference in the Open5GS NRF multipart parser, fixed upstream with a CVE requested. The second is an ASN.1-PER memory amplification in the free5GC NGAP decoder. A 2-byte input from a rogue gNodeB OOM-kills the AMF in 6.2 seconds. The third is a defective patch on CVE-2025-69248 whose defense-in-depth check is dead code before authentication.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

CHISEL-ing Back Source Code with AI-enabled Iterative Recovery

Decompilation aims to recover high-level, compilable, and semantically equivalent code from binaries. Traditional decompilers produce pseudo-C that is difficult to read and does not compile, while the recent LLM-assisted approaches generate readable, but semantically incorrect code. LLM-aided iterative recovery is an emerging branch of research, but prior works rely on supplied test suites for semantic recovery. In this work, we present CHISEL, a test suite-free framework to iteratively recover source code from Ghidra-derived pseudo-C. CHISEL uses simple yet effective feedback from a compiler (static analysis) and a coverage-guided fuzzer (differential analysis), augmented by rich observables for grounded divergence detection and feedback, cross-iteration divergence memory, and best candidate retention. We systematically evaluate CHISEL for compilation and semantic recovery, feedback oracle soundness, and iteration overhead on 120 ExeBench functions compiled for the x86-64 architecture, across four optimizations (O0-O3), in both stripped and unstripped variants, using the open-weight Gemma4:31b LLM. CHISEL, with all recommended features, achieves an average of 96.1% re-compilability and 79.8% re-executability rates at an average of 2.1 iterations. Significantly, CHISEL recovers 26% of first-generation execution errors. At the same time, CHISEL feedback oracle falsely accepts only 9.4% candidates. Lastly, CHISEL performs significantly better than two recent prior work on LLM-assisted decompilation.

cs.CR↗