Diego Siguenza-Alvarado | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Wake effects in a 100 GW North Sea offshore wind scenario: a model intercomparison under year-round weather conditions

Large-scale offshore wind development will intensify wake interactions between wind farm clusters in the North Sea, increasing uncertainty in regional energy estimates. We assess HARMONIE-AROME mesoscale simulations, ASPIRE large-eddy simulations (LES), and three engineering wake models based on Jensen, Bastankhah Gaussian, and TurbOPark formulations for a 100.7 GW 2050 offshore wind scenario. We find that LES and mesoscale simulations accurately represent observed local free-stream wind conditions. Moreover, all engineering wake models predict higher mean wind speeds than LES in every month, with biases reaching 0.60-0.70 m/s at 10-40 km downstream. These differences also vary systematically with atmospheric regime: the Bastankhah Gaussian model remains positively biased across wind speed and stability conditions, whereas Jensen and TurbOPark shift from underprediction in unstable and near-neutral conditions to overprediction in stable conditions at 8-12 m/s. These results show that agreement in annual capacity factor can conceal substantial differences across space, time, and atmospheric regime, highlighting the importance of including sensitivity to model formulation in regional wind energy assessments.

physics.flu-dyn↗

arXiv2026

Assessing engineering wake models against operational data: insights from the Lillgrund wind farm wake steering campaign

Validating engineering wake models under real-world operational conditions is essential for improving wind farm performance predictions. This study uses a unique dataset from the Lillgrund offshore wind farm, collected during the Horizon 2020 TotalControl campaign, integrating synchronous Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) measurements under both baseline operation and active wake steering conditions. Four analytical wake-model combinations, implemented in the LongSim software developed by DNV, are evaluated using different formulations for velocity deficit, added turbulence, wake superposition and wake deflection. The analysis focuses on time-averaged wake velocity deficit profiles and turbine- and farm-wide power output, normalised by reference velocity and power. Model accuracy is assessed using mean absolute error (MAE) metrics. The models generally reproduce wake deficit trends associated with varying wake overlap under baseline conditions, as well as wake deflection caused by intentional yaw misalignment during wake steering operation. Normalised velocity deficit MAE values range from 7% to 15%, with discrepancies mainly linked to inflow heterogeneity, near-wake complexity and model-specific parameterisations. Power prediction errors increase with farm depth. Model combinations incorporating cumulative wake superposition and refined turbulence formulations show improved agreement with field measurements; however, all models struggle to capture localised flow features. Normalised turbine-level power output MAE ranges from 3% to 23%, while farm-wide power output errors range between -13% and +30%. Accurate farm-level predictions may conceal compensating errors at individual turbines. Future work should focus on improved inflow characterisation and blockage effects to enhance predictive reliability.

physics.flu-dyn↗