arXiv subjects

Diana Koldasbayeva

Publications and source records attributed to Diana Koldasbayeva.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Reliable Risk Estimation with Kernel Mean Matching under Dependent Sampling

Kernel Mean Matching (KMM) estimates risk under covariate shift by reweighting labelled source samples so that their kernel mean embedding matches that of unlabeled target samples. Existing finite-sample guarantees are usually stated for independent samples, although many applications involve temporal, spatial, or clustered dependence. We give a finite-sample KMM analysis under dependent sampling by replacing nominal sample sizes with effective sample sizes in the concentration steps used by the classical proof. The approach uses Bernstein inequalities for geometrically strongly mixing processes and derives a model-based effective sample size. The resulting bound separates overlap, dependence, and smoothness effects with specific constants derived under a Gaussian process assumption. This analysis yields an additional tradeoff: smoother losses preserve more input dependence and therefore reduce effective sample size, while also reducing function complexity and empirical-to-population risk gaps. Applying the result to prediction yields confidence intervals that achieve near-nominal coverage in synthetic experiments and substantially reduce undercoverage on real monitoring data.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Foundation for unbiased cross-validation of spatio-temporal models for species distribution modeling

Evaluating the predictive performance of species distribution models (SDMs) under realistic deployment scenarios requires careful handling of spatial and temporal dependencies in the data. Cross-validation (CV) is the standard approach for model evaluation, but its design strongly influences the validity of performance estimates. When SDMs are intended for spatial or temporal transfer, random CV can lead to overoptimistic results due to spatial autocorrelation (SAC) among neighboring observations. We benchmark four machine learning algorithms (GBM, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest) on two real-world presence-absence datasets, a temperate plant and an anadromous fish, using multiple CV designs: random, spatial, spatio-temporal, environmental, and forward-chaining. Two training data usage strategies (LAST FOLD and RETRAIN) are evaluated, with hyperparameter tuning performed within each CV scheme. Model performance is assessed on independent out-of-time test sets using AUC, MAE, and correlation metrics. Random CV overestimates AUC by up to 0.16 and produces MAE values up to 80 percent higher than spatially blocked alternatives. Blocking at the empirical SAC range substantially reduces this bias. Training strategy affects evaluation outcomes: LAST FOLD yields smaller validation-test discrepancies under strong SAC, while RETRAIN achieves higher test AUC when SAC is weaker. Boosted ensemble models consistently perform best under spatially structured CV designs. We recommend a robust SDM workflow based on SAC-aware blocking, blocked hyperparameter tuning, and external temporal validation to improve reliability under spatial and temporal shifts.

stat.AP↗

arXiv2023

Challenges in data-based geospatial modeling for environmental research and practice

With the rise of electronic data, particularly Earth observation data, data-based geospatial modelling using machine learning (ML) has gained popularity in environmental research. Accurate geospatial predictions are vital for domain research based on ecosystem monitoring and quality assessment and for policy-making and action planning, considering effective management of natural resources. The accuracy and computation speed of ML has generally proved efficient. However, many questions have yet to be addressed to obtain precise and reproducible results suitable for further use in both research and practice. A better understanding of the ML concepts applicable to geospatial problems enhances the development of data science tools providing transparent information crucial for making decisions on global challenges such as biosphere degradation and climate change. This survey reviews common nuances in geospatial modelling, such as imbalanced data, spatial autocorrelation, prediction errors, model generalisation, domain specificity, and uncertainty estimation. We provide an overview of techniques and popular programming tools to overcome or account for the challenges. We also discuss prospects for geospatial Artificial Intelligence in environmental applications.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2023

Correcting sampling biases via importance reweighting for spatial modeling

In machine learning models, the estimation of errors is often complex due to distribution bias, particularly in spatial data such as those found in environmental studies. We introduce an approach based on the ideas of importance sampling to obtain an unbiased estimate of the target error. By taking into account difference between desirable error and available data, our method reweights errors at each sample point and neutralizes the shift. Importance sampling technique and kernel density estimation were used for reweighteing. We validate the effectiveness of our approach using artificial data that resemble real-world spatial datasets. Our findings demonstrate advantages of the proposed approach for the estimation of the target error, offering a solution to a distribution shift problem. Overall error of predictions dropped from 7% to just 2% and it gets smaller for larger samples.

cs.LG↗