arXiv subjects

Di Bai

Publications and source records attributed to Di Bai.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

See you again: an $80^\circ$ NGC~5466 stellar stream and its constraints on the Galactic dark halo mass

Using \textit{Gaia} Data Release 3 combined with Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Legacy Imaging Survey Data Release 9 and Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System Data Release 2, we apply a modified matched filter method to obtain a weighted stellar map in the surrounding of the globular cluster NGC~5466. Our results support that the tidal stream of NGC~5466 extends around $80^\circ$ on the sky, and the leading tail seemingly exhibits an upward deviation in the range of $180^\circ \lesssim α\lesssim 190^\circ$, which supports previous claim that the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) may have caused dynamical perturbations to the stream. Based on the 308 highly-weighted member candidates of the NGC~5466 stream, we try to measure the mass distribution of the Milky Way dark matter halo along with the mass of LMC. By comparing the observed stream candidate members to a series of model streams generated under different potential parameters, we obtain the posterior distributions of the parameters: the circular velocity at the solar radius $V_{\rm c} = 239.56^{+1.46}_{-1.44}\ \mathrm{km\ s^{-1}}$, the density flattening of the halo $q = 1.08^{+0.07}_{-0.07}$, the scale radius of the halo density profile $r_s = 12.97^{+3.02}_{-2.18}\ \mathrm{kpc}$ and the total mass of the LMC $M_{\rm LMC} = 9.63^{+1.89}_{-2.00}\times 10^{10}$ $\mathrm{M_\odot}$. The enclosed mass of the Milky Way within the stream apocenter radius of $\sim$ 50 kpc is calculated as $M_{\rm MW}(<50~\mathrm{kpc}) = 4.59^{+0.48}_{-0.37} \times 10^{11}$ $\mathrm{M_\odot}$.

astro-ph.GA↗

arXiv2026

Toolflation: Seller Agents Distort Tool Markets Through Spontaneous Generative Engine Optimization

Agents are starting to sell to other agents. Seller agents write the listings of tools, services and products, and buyer agents read these listings when they choose what to use. We show that seller agents told only to be selected more often practice generative engine optimization on their own, and that this distorts the market for sellers and for buyers. We build tool markets from real data tools on Amazon and Instagram and run every tool on every question, so we know which tools can answer each question. Under all five production models we test, sellers rewrite their descriptions to claim more and more fields, including fields that their tools return for fewer than half of the targets. We call this process toolflation. Nothing in the market limits it, and how far it goes depends on the model, as the number of claims that contradict the sellers' own evidence differs by an order of magnitude between models. Toolflation shifts the buyers' choices between sellers, and the most capable tool loses share in seven of the ten combinations of seller model and platform. Under four models, the choices stay with capable tools and buyer agents keep their task success. Under the fifth, sellers copy one another until the descriptions no longer tell the tools apart. Buyer agents then pick tools by their position in the list, tools that answer almost nothing win a quarter to two fifths of the choices, and task success falls from 89% to about 30% on Amazon, close to random choice, and from 77% to 40% on Instagram. The sellers did only what their vendors asked, and the cost fell on buyers they never dealt with. We therefore argue that honesty toward third parties under competition is part of safety alignment, and that models should be tested as sellers before they are deployed as sellers.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Reasoning Reranking with Semantic IDs as the Sole Item Representation

Reasoning rerankers write a rationale before ranking a candidate slate, and existing systems read item metadata to do so, even though generative recommenders increasingly represent items as compact Semantic IDs (SIDs). Ranking from SIDs alone has two appeals: SID prompts are far shorter than the matched item text, and although item codes are fixed from content, the backbone learns their token embeddings in part from user-item interaction sequences, so the tokens can carry behavioral signal that item text lacks. That training targets next-item generation, and whether it supports ranking a supplied slate from SIDs alone is untested. We build ReRankID, a controlled testbed in which models reason and rank from a history and slate shown only as SIDs, varying item rendering, history length, and slate size one at a time. On this testbed, such models often copy the input order instead of reranking, and readable metadata does not repair the failure. We compare supervised fine-tuning, rejection-sampled self-training, on-policy distillation, and verifier-based reinforcement learning as post-training methods and find that they elicit the missing behavior. The strongest post-trained model, the 8B model trained with a graded ranking reward, gives the best SID-only ranking and matches strong text-reading LLMs whose prompts are about 20x longer. It ranks above random with no history at all, where a caption-reading reference does not, and it keeps its gains at long histories, where text prompts pass 50k tokens and the caption-reading reference stops improving. In a paired rationale audit, this model argues trade-offs better than that reference but describes items less accurately. The common post-training methods we test thus elicit ranking from SIDs but not faithful item descriptions, which calls for post-training that improves the reasoning itself, not only the ranking it produces.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Humanity's Last Choice: A Common Evaluation Standard for Generative Engine Optimization

Humanity's Last Choice describes the idea that the last choice people need to make is which AI system they entrust with the decisions that follow. These systems rely on external sources that content providers can edit through generative engine optimization (GEO) to increase source visibility and influence recommendations. Choosing among these systems therefore requires comparable evidence of how well they carry out user requests when exposed to GEO. Benchmarks have made progress in standardizing tasks, models, and metrics, but they often define their own spaces of GEO strategies and use different editing constraints. These differences can conflate gains from better optimization algorithms with those from greater freedom to edit sources, while making evaluation coverage difficult to compare across benchmarks. We therefore call for a common evaluation standard and propose a meta-taxonomy that describes where sources are edited, how they are edited, and what signals those edits target. Drawing on representative literature, we map existing strategies into a searchable space and outline a protocol for controlled comparisons with explicit coverage reporting. This provides a foundation for common leaderboards that can inform which systems people choose to rely on.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Dream-RSI: Recursive Self-Improvement through Evolving Worlds

Recursive self-improvement is becoming essential for autonomous AI agents, whose progress depends on discovering high-value solutions across complex domains. Effective exploration drives this process, yet managing and improving exploration strategies remains a major bottleneck. Current systems face a fundamental dilemma: fixed strategies fail to adapt as search spaces scale, while online policy optimization must navigate vast meta-search spaces under delayed, expensive feedback from long-horizon rollouts. We introduce \textsc{Dream-RSI}, a framework for scalable, recursively self-improving exploration. A lightweight orchestration layer makes exploration explicit and programmable while leaving the underlying base agent unchanged. Our key insight is that accumulated discovery history can act as a replay simulator over the realized search space. By dreaming within this simulator built from historical discovery trees, \textsc{Dream-RSI} obtains immediate, low-cost off-policy feedback to evaluate and refine exploration policies without repeated, expensive online evaluation. The improved policy is then redeployed online to drive further discovery, continuously expanding the simulator pool in a self-improving loop. Across 9 tasks in 4 domains, \textsc{Dream-RSI} achieves competitive quality and improves discovery efficiency in several settings.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Decomposing Staleness in Recommender Systems: A Dual-Filter Framework for Supersession and Decay

Stale recommendations are a pervasive challenge and a leading source of user complaints on large-scale content platforms. Items lose relevance through two primary mechanisms: supersession, where emerging updates render prior coverage stale, and relevance decay, where an item's informational value naturally diminishes over its lifecycle. Traditional countermeasures serve as crude proxies: age cutoffs poorly reflect actual relevance loss, while engagement heuristics rely on lagging signals, broadly exposing users to stale content before the system adapts. We present SDF (Supersession-Decay Filtering), a staleness filtering system fully deployed in Google Discover, a personalized recommendation feed with hundreds of millions of daily and billions of monthly active users. SDF targets both mechanisms with complementary filters, each powered by a learned model: a relational staleness model that detects supersession between item pairs, and a predicted traffic ratio (PTR) model that forecasts relevance decay from the item's content, trained on lifetime visit traffic. Applied via disjunction upstream of the ranking stage, SDF prunes stale candidates, measurably reducing downstream serving costs. Online experiments demonstrate that these filters significantly reduce the prevalence of stale content while improving user engagement. Over a two-year production deployment, user-filed staleness reports (in-product user feedback) declined by 54.9% relative to the pre-deployment baseline, establishing SDF as a robust and scalable paradigm for resolving content staleness at industrial scale.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

Heterogeneous Ranking in Industrial-Scale Recommender Systems: A Case Study

Heterogeneous recommendation feeds present complex challenges that extend beyond those found in highly homogeneous environments (e.g., music-only or video-only closed-ecosystem platforms). In Google Discover, a unified feed integrates diverse content sourced from the decentralized open web, including web articles, long-form and short-form videos, user-generated content (UGC), and beyond. Different content types exhibit distinct feature densities and user interaction patterns. Building a unified ranking model that sustains high performance across such heterogeneity, while avoiding negative transfer or majority bias, remains a significant industrial challenge. This paper presents an end-to-end case study on the industrial-scale multi-task ranking of heterogeneous feeds, grounded in real-world deployment. We introduce HA-MoE, a heterogeneity-adaptive multi-gated mixture-of-experts architecture that incorporates explicit heterogeneity context into both gating networks and expert representations. This approach enables effective specialization without significantly increasing operational overhead. To support reliable deployment, we introduce LENS, a lightweight observability framework that provides interpretable diagnostics of expert specialization and tracks this functional heterogeneity across continuous retraining. We evaluate our method using Dual-Level AUC (DL-AUC), a heterogeneity-aware evaluation metric that combines global ranking performance with cross-segment ranking correctness. Offline evaluations on a large-scale industrial dataset demonstrate consistent improvements over baseline models. Furthermore, online A/B testing confirms gains in feed activity and exploration metrics. Together, offline and online results validate the effectiveness of our approach for managing heterogeneity in industrial-scale recommender systems.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2026

AgenticRecTune: Multi-Agent with Self-Evolving Skillhub for Recommendation System Optimization

Modern large-scale recommendation systems are typically constructed as multi-stage pipelines, encompassing pre-ranking, ranking, and re-ranking phases. While traditional recommendation research typically focuses on optimizing a specific model, such as improving the pre-ranking model structure or ranking models training algorithm, system-level configurations optimization play a crucial role, which integrates the output from each model head to get the final score in each stage. Due to the complexity of the system, the configuration optimization is highly important and challenging. Any model modification requires new optimal system-level configurations. But each experimental iteration requires significant tuning effort. Furthermore, models in different stage operates within a distinct context and optimizes for different targets, requiring specialized domain expertise. In addition, optimization success depends on balancing competing multiple online metrics and alignment with shifting production development objectives. To address these challenges, we propose AgenticRecTune, an agentic framework comprising five specialized agents, Actor, Critic, Insight, Skill, and Online, designed to manage the end-to-end configuration optimization workflow. By leveraging the advanced reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically Gemini, AgenticRecTune explore the optimal configuration spaces. The Actor Agent proposes multiple candidates and Critic Agent filters out suboptimal proposals.Then Online Agent autonomously prepares A/B tests based on the proposed configurations set from the Critic Agent and captures the subsequencet experimental results. We also introduce a self-evolving Skillhub, which utilizes a collaboration between the Insight Agent and Skill Agent to summarize the history results, extract underlying mechanics of each task in recommendation system and update skills.

cs.IR↗

arXiv2017

Verifying Stochastic Behaviors of Decentralized Self-Adaptive Systems: A Formal Modeling and Simulation Based Approach

Self-adaptive software is considered as the most advanced approach and its development attracts a lot of attention. Decentralization is an effective way to design and manage the complexity of modern self-adaptive software systems. However, there are still tremendous challenges. One major challenge is to unify decentrality with traditional self-adaptive implementation framework during design and implementation activity. One is to guarantee the required global goals and performance of decentralized self-adaptive systems operating in highly dynamic and uncertain environments. Another challenge is to predict the influence of system's internal change on its self-adaptability to the environment. To solve these problems, we combine the mechanisms of separation of concerns with modeling method using timed automata to allow the system to be analyzed and verified. Timed computation tree logic is used to specify system goals and stochastic simulations in dynamic environment are experimented to verify decentralized self-adaptive system's adaptation properties. In this paper, we extracted a motivation example from practical applications in UAV emergency mission scenarios. The whole approach is evaluated and illustrated with this motivation example and the statistical results can be used as reference for arrangement planning of UAVs in cyber physical spaces.

cs.SE↗