arXiv subjects

Dhruv Dixit

Publications and source records attributed to Dhruv Dixit.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Mapping the Climate-Health Evidence Base (2007-2023): A Bibliometric, Statistical, and NLP Multi-Label Text Analysis of 22,695 Records

We analyzed a curated climate--health bibliographic corpus of 22,695 multi-labeled records from 2007--2023 to characterize growth, thematic concentration, and evolving methods. Annual publication counts rose sharply, with multiple change-points indicating phase-structured expansion; Negative Binomial models estimated roughly 10--11% year-over-year growth. Exposure--health co-occurrence departed strongly from independence, with canonical hazard--outcome dyads (e.g., extreme heat with heat-related impacts; floods/hurricanes with mental health) occurring far more often than expected even after accounting for marginal term popularity. A hierarchical logistic model for asthma-tagged records showed strong alignment with air-pollution-related exposures (including ozone and particulate matter) and relative under-representation of generic heat/temperature terms. Methodologically, modeling timescales shifted toward longer horizons over time, while at least one legacy method tag declined. Finally, we detected time- and geography-dependent annotation completeness, including decreased exposure-term coding in recent years, underscoring the need to model missingness when interpreting temporal trends.

cs.DL↗

arXiv2026

R2VC: Modular Fact-Checking with Retrieval, Verification, and Confidence Calibration

Large language models are increasingly used for automated fact checking, but end-to-end prompting often entangles evidence retrieval, reasoning, and uncertainty estimation, making failures difficult to diagnose and confidence difficult to trust. We present R2VC, a modular retrieve, reason, verify, calibrate architecture for evidence-grounded fact checking with citations and abstention. R2VC combines hybrid sparse+dense retrieval over Wikipedia, a supervised fine-tuned and DPO-aligned generator that produces diverse structured verdict candidates, an external NLI cross-encoder for evidence-based candidate selection, and a lightweight sequence-level calibrator for confidence estimation and selective abstention. On FEVER, an 8B backbone with R2VC achieves 13.74% higher accuracy than baseline. Ablation studies show that verifier-based candidate selection and confidence calibration are the largest contributors to performance. Removing candidate selection drops FEVER accuracy to 76.24%, while removing calibration nearly doubles the Brier score to 0.161. A manual analysis of 250 errors further shows that retrieval failures, especially wrong-entity evidence, remain the dominant bottleneck. Together, these results show that modular fact-checking pipelines can substantially improve both predictive accuracy and confidence reliability in open-domain verification.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Detecting Speculative Language in Biomedical Texts using Recurrent Neural Tensor Networks

In this investigation, we delve into the automated detection of speculative language within biomedical articles by utilizing distributed sentence representations and advanced deep learning techniques. The implications of such identification extend to information retrieval, multi-document summarization, and the exploration of new knowledge. Our exploration encompasses two distinct approaches for acquiring distributed sentence representations: the Paragraph Vector model and the Recursive Neural Tensor Network. These methodologies are then rigorously compared against three foundational baseline algorithms: Support Vector Machines, Naive Bayes, and pattern matching. Our findings reveal that the Recursive Neural Tensor Network (RNTN) demonstrates a slight performance edge (F1 = 0.885) over the top-performing baseline, the linear bigram SVM (F1 = 0.881). Meanwhile, the Paragraph Vector model proves less effective (F1 = 0.368), even after extensive training using an expansive, unlabeled dataset. We engage in a comprehensive discourse on the factors influencing these performance disparities and provide insightful recommendations for future research directions.

cs.CL↗