arXiv subjects

Derya Akbaba

Publications and source records attributed to Derya Akbaba.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Designing Vibes in a Science Museum: from @Science to @hugging_face

While feminist and critical data theories have long critiqued the use of data to uphold a positivist-informed view about science, few examples offer alternative methods to display scientific constructs. In response, we present Data and Me: an exhibit informed by feminist and critical data theories, which we designed and launched at a local science museum. Data and Me introduces museum visitors to data using a [AT]:hugging_face: vibe -- a vibe that signals that data can be [hashtag]slow, [hashtag]handmade, and [hashtag]personal. We designed this vibe to be noticeably different than the [AT]Science vibe in the rest of the museum. Throughout our design process, we adapted visualization vibes as an analytic and generative tool in the context of a science museum. We present four design choices that enable the design of a vibe: visual, topical, material, and crediting. We discuss how our exhibit aligns with ongoing discussions about alternative research outcomes and calls for plurality in HCI.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Thinking Inside the Box: Considerations for Putting Data Physicalization Workshops in a Box

Visualization researchers utilize workshops both for applied research and to engage different populations with visualization-based activities. While there are many benefits to running visualization workshops, their utility and impact rely on the presence of a researcher who has deep knowledge about visualization theory and practice. In this work, we introduce workshop-in-a-box as a design concept intended to challenge the researcher-centric approach to data physicalization workshops. Through a design study with a socially innovative organization, we deployed several data physicalization workshops that our collaborator ran instead of us. Based on this experience, along with two accompanying case studies that validate the concept, we present material and procedural considerations for how to put data physicalization workshops into a box and the implications it has for extending visualization research outside the bounds of academia.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Reflections on Traceability for Visualization Research

Decades of advocacy for reproducibility and replication have advanced open, transparent practices in the sciences. However, traditional notions of reproducibility fit poorly with design-oriented visualization research, where insights emerge through subjective, situated, and iterative work. So how can we ensure rigor and transparency in processes that are inherently unreproducible? To introduce transparency in design-oriented research, we propose to focus on traceability: surfacing the origin and development of research contributions based on rich sets of artifacts documenting the design process. We investigated traceability through a collaborative autoethnographic reflection that builds on several years of work exploring ways to make design-oriented research transparent. This exploration includes an experiment to build a tool to support traceability, which we called tRRRacer. The tRRRacer tool provided a testbed for us to operationalize the three tenets of a traceable process: (1) Record abundant, annotated artifacts representative of research activities; (2) Report curated research threads that articulate rationale and evolution of the process, allowing others to (3) Read via interfaces that help retrace claims and assess plausibility. Reflecting on our experiences, we contribute a theorization of traceability and reflections on how we might support it.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Discursive Patinas: Anchoring Discussions in Data Visualizations

This paper presents discursive patinas, a technique to visualize discussions onto data visualizations, inspired by how people leave traces in the physical world. While data visualizations are widely discussed in online communities and social media, comments tend to be displayed separately from the visualization and we lack ways to relate these discussions back to the content of the visualization, e.g., to situate comments, explain visual patterns, or question assumptions. In our visualization annotation interface, users can designate areas within the visualization. Discursive patinas are made of overlaid visual marks (anchors), attached to textual comments with category labels, likes, and replies. By coloring and styling the anchors, a meta visualization emerges, showing what and where people comment and annotate the visualization. These patinas show regions of heavy discussions, recent commenting activity, and the distribution of questions, suggestions, or personal stories. We ran workshops with 90 students, domain experts, and visualization researchers to study how people use anchors to discuss visualizations and how patinas influence people's understanding of the discussion. Our results show that discursive patinas improve the ability to navigate discussions and guide people to comments that help understand, contextualize, or scrutinize the visualization. We discuss the potential of anchors and patinas to support discursive engagements, including critical readings of visualizations, design feedback, and feminist approaches to data visualization.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2021

Manifesto for Putting 'Chartjunk' in the Trash 2021!

In this provocation we ask the visualization research community to join us in removing chartjunk from our research lexicon. We present an etymology of chartjunk, framing its provocative origins as misaligned, and harmful, to the ways the term is currently used by visualization researchers. We call on the community to dissolve chartjunk from the ways we talk about, write about, and think about the graphical devices we design and study. As a step towards this goal we contribute a performance of maintenance through a trio of acts: editing the Wikipedia page on chartjunk, cutting out chartjunk from IEEE papers, and scanning and posting a repository of the pages with chartjunk removed to invite the community to re-imagine how we describe visualizations. This contribution blurs the boundaries between research, activism, and maintenance art, and is intended to inspire the community to join us in taking out the trash.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2021

Data Hunches: Incorporating Personal Knowledge into Visualizations

The trouble with data is that it frequently provides only an imperfect representation of a phenomenon of interest. Experts who are familiar with their datasets will often make implicit, mental corrections when analyzing a dataset, or will be cautious not to be over-confident in any findings if caveats are present. However, the implicit knowledge about the caveats of a dataset are typically not collected in a structured way, which is problematic especially when teams work together who might have knowledge about different aspects of a dataset. In this work, we define such analyst's knowledge about datasets as data hunches. We discuss the implications of data hunches and propose a set of techniques for recording and communicating data hunches through data visualization. Furthermore, we provide guidelines for designing visualizations that support recording and visualizing data hunches. We envision that data hunches will empower analysts to externalize their knowledge, facilitate collaboration and communication, and support the ability to learn from others' data hunches.

cs.HC↗