Dengfeng Chen | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Rapid-Deployment Crack Measurement Based on SAM3 Semantic-Edge Response Decoding

Reliable crack measurement is essential for infrastructure condition assessment, yet existing image-based approaches typically depend on pixel-wise annotations, task-specific segmentation training, and mask-based geometric measurement, making cross-scene deployment costly and sensitive to segmentation errors. We identify an output-interface mismatch in SAM3: its prompt-conditioned semantic response preserves crack evidence that is often suppressed or spatially distorted in the final candidate masks. Across six public crack datasets, the internal response achieves 82.66% average crack-pixel recall, compared with 74.66% for the retained SAM3 proposals, with an average mismatch ratio of 8.73%. Based on this observation, we propose Semantic-Edge Response Decoding (SERD) to calibrate the semantic response using a fixed Sobel structural field, and further develop SERD-DQ, a training-free framework that directly estimates crack centerline and transverse geometry from the continuous decoded response without generating an intermediate predicted mask. Experiments verify both segmentation fidelity and direct geometric measurement against manually established pixel-level references. Compared with native SAM3 mask-based quantification, SERD-DQ reduces width MAE from 6.072 to 5.547 pixels, length relative error from 22.245% to 17.355%, and area relative error from 33.921% to 26.228%, while achieving a latent geometry recovery rate of 0.394. The results indicate that continuous semantic-edge responses provide a more reliable interface for training-free crack quantification than conventional mask-mediated measurement.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

CoRe-SAM3: Conditional Semantic--Visual Reconciliation for SAM3 Crack Segmentation

Crack segmentation requires a model to recognize target semantics while accurately recovering thin, low-contrast, and topologically continuous local structures. Although SAM3 provides strong open-concept segmentation, its direct application to the crack domain still misses weak cracks, activates crack-like background regions, and produces local boundary errors. We first diagnose the functional differences between the internal prompt-conditioned semantic representation and native visual representation of SAM3 on five crack datasets. The results show that the semantic representation already carries most task information for crack prediction, whereas the utility of the visual representation depends on the current semantic state. Directly combining the two representations does not yield consistent gains. Based on this finding, we propose Conditional Semantic--Visual Reconciliation, termed CoRe. CoRe retains semantic prediction as the primary decision path, applies lightweight semantic calibration to adjust the target-domain decision mapping, and uses spatially aligned native visual evidence to generate a zero-initialized, bounded, and regularized conditional residual that selectively corrects existing predictions. Across five domains, CoRe-SAM3 improves the average Crack IoU from 62.34% to 70.47% and clDice from 81.98% to 89.24%, while introducing only 18.914 K trainable parameters. Prediction-transition analysis further shows that CoRe corrects an average of 34.38% of native errors, with a damage rate of only 0.23% on pixels correctly classified by native SAM3. These results demonstrate that constrained prediction correction based on the functional differences between internal representations provides an effective and parameter-efficient target-domain adaptation strategy for vision foundation models with strong task-specific semantic priors.

cs.CV↗