arXiv subjects

Deepak Varuvel Dennison

Publications and source records attributed to Deepak Varuvel Dennison.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

From Written Response to Dialogue with AI: How Activity Format, Interaction Modality, and Language Impact Student Learning and Engagement

The widespread availability of LLMs is challenging written learning activities, as students can increasingly generate responses without necessarily engaging with the learning content. Conversational AI creates an opportunity to redesign these activities as dialogue, while multilingual capabilities may make such dialogue more accessible to students learning through a non-native language. We conducted a field study with 305 native Kannada-speaking undergraduate students at English-medium institutions in Karnataka, India. We compared written response activities with text- and voice-based dialogic activities with AI, each conducted in English-only or bilingual Kannada-English settings. Students who completed dialogic activities spent more time on the activities, contributed more, and reported greater interest and self-efficacy than those completing written responses, although fewer students completed the dialogic activities overall. Knowledge increased across all conditions, with no reliable differences in gains between activity formats or languages. Language shaped participation differently across modalities: bilingual interaction was particularly beneficial in voice dialogue, where it reduced articulation difficulties, increased turns demonstrating understanding, and reduced conversation abandonment. However, students also valued English because of its connection to their academic and professional aspirations. These findings show that designing dialogic learning with AI requires more than choosing between writing and dialogue, voice and text, or English and students' native languages. We highlight opportunities to give learners greater control over modality, information, and pace, and to use native languages as translanguaging support rather than as a replacement for English.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

Teachers' Perceived Benefits and Risks of AI Across Fifty-Five Countries: An Audit of LLM Alignment and Steerability

Teachers' trust in artificial intelligence (AI) in education depends on how they balance its perceived benefits and risks. Yet global discussions about scaling AI in education rely on fragmented evidence, as most studies of teachers' perceptions focus on single countries or small samples. This lack of representative cross-national evidence limits both theory building and policy development. At the same time, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in research, policy, and teachers' professional workflows, despite limited validation in education. To address these gaps, we conduct a large-scale audit of LLM alignment with teachers' perceptions of AI by combining representative international survey data with systematic model evaluation. Using OECD TALIS data from 55 countries and territories, we measure cross-national variation in teachers' perceived benefits and risks of AI. We then benchmark responses from eight state-of-the-art LLMs across four providers under both general and country-specific prompting, comparing higher- and lower-reasoning models. Results reveal substantial cross-national variation in teacher perceptions that is not reliably reflected in LLM outputs. Models compress country differences, overestimate both benefits and risks, and show limited gains from identity prompting or enhanced reasoning. This misalignment matters because LLM-generated guidance and professional discourse increasingly shape how teachers learn about and discuss AI, potentially influencing trust and future adoption decisions. Our findings caution against treating LLM outputs as substitutes for direct engagement with teachers when informing global AI-in-education initiatives. At the same time, some models (e.g., Gemini 3 Fast) partially capture cross-national ranking patterns, suggesting a complementary role in hypothesis generation and exploratory comparative analysis.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Shiksha Copilot: Teacher-AI Collaboration for Curating and Customizing Lesson Plans in Low-Resource Schools

This study investigates Shiksha copilot, an AI-assisted lesson planning tool deployed in government schools across Karnataka, India. The system combined LLMs and human expertise through a structured process in which English and Kannada lesson plans were co-created by curators and AI; teachers then further customized these curated plans for their classrooms using their own expertise alongside AI support. Drawing on a large-scale mixed-methods study involving 1,043 teachers and 23 curators, we examine how educators collaborate with AI to generate context-sensitive lesson plans, assess the quality of AI-generated content, and analyze shifts in teaching practices within multilingual, low-resource environments. Our findings show that teachers used Shiksha copilot both to meet administrative documentation needs and to support their teaching. The tool eased bureaucratic workload, reduced lesson planning time, and lowered teaching-related stress, while promoting a shift toward activity-based pedagogy. However, systemic challenges such as staffing shortages and administrative demands constrained broader pedagogical change. We frame these findings through the lenses of teacher-AI collaboration and communities of practice to examine the effective integration of AI tools in teaching. Finally, we propose design directions for future teacher-centered EdTech, particularly in multilingual and Global South contexts.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2026

Designing Culturally Aligned AI Systems For Social Good in Non-Western Contexts

AI technologies are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as education, healthcare, law, and agriculture to address complex challenges in non-Western contexts. This paper examines eight real-world deployments spanning seven countries and 18 languages, combining 17 interviews with AI developers and domain experts with secondary research. Our findings identify six cross-cutting factors - Language, Institution, Safety, Task, End-User Demography, and Domain - that structured how systems were designed and deployed. These factors were shaped by Sociocultural (diversity, practices), Institutional (resources, policies), and Technological (capabilities, limits) influences. We find that building effective AI systems required extensive collaboration between AI developers and domain experts, with human resources proving more critical to achieving safe and effective outcomes in high-stakes domains than technological expertise alone. Additionally, we present 12 guidelines synthesizing these dynamics for designing AI for social good systems that are culturally grounded, equitable, and responsive to the needs of non-Western contexts.

cs.HC↗