Debabina Biswas | arXiv Science

arXiv2026

Hadronic tau decays at higher orders in QCD

We ask what the four known coefficients of the Adler function in massless QCD can support about the unknown coefficient $c_{5,1}$ of $a^5$. In fixed-order perturbation theory the Adler-to-moment map is triangular with unit diagonal; hence a multi-weight relative test of a common forecast reduces exactly to one absolute coefficient tolerance. For three complementary weights, a ten-percent withheld-order test requires $|\widehat c_{4,1}-c_{4,1}|\leq2.1509$ and resolves $c_{5,1}$ only to about $\pm24$. Direct Shanks/Padé continuation cannot reach the usual literature range without reversing the sign of its next defect. We therefore apply a cross-validated renormalon-closure (CVRC) protocol to a pure-power Beneke--Jamin-type Borel ansatz. CVRC calibrates and tests this declared structure; it is not a new renormalon model. The calibrated construction gives the conditional estimate $c_{5,1}=248\pm30\,(\mathrm{struct})\pm74\,(\mathrm{method})=248\pm80$. The band is nonstatistical, and a recursive test misses the known $c_{4,1}$ by $29.9\%$. Thus the result is a model-qualified estimate consistent with existing determinations, not evidence that four coefficients determine the fifth.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2026

Cross-Moment Consistency and the Fifth Adler Coefficient in Hadronic Tau Decays

The unknown coefficient $c_{5,1}$ controls the first omitted fifth-order term in fixed-order analyses of inclusive hadronic $τ$ decays. We determine what the four known Adler coefficients can actually test. For any normalized polynomial weight, the fixed-order Adler-to-moment map is triangular with unit diagonal. Hence one common Adler-coefficient error reaches every moment with the same absolute size, and a multi-weight relative test reduces to one absolute tolerance. For three representative weights, a ten-percent test resolves $c_{5,1}$ only to about $\pm24$; the closest contour-improved test is weaker by more than an order of magnitude. Moreover, any continuation that preserves the observed sign of the direct Padé/Shanks defects gives $c_{5,1}\geq378.03$, so values near $280$ require additional structure. A calibration-and-falsification protocol applied to a simplified Beneke--Jamin-type pure-power ansatz gives the conditional estimate $c_{5,1}=248\pm30\,(\mathrm{struct})\pm74\,(\mathrm{method})=248\pm80$. At the physical order its central value coincides algebraically with the exact four-parameter fit; the protocol adds a falsifiable admissibility test and a method uncertainty, not new coefficient information. We also clarify that the often-quoted Beneke--Jamin value $283$ is a linear extrapolation of total-width FOPT te

hep-ph↗