arXiv Science⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Dawei Zhou

Publications and source records attributed to Dawei Zhou.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

SAGE: Mitigating Long-Horizon Reasoning Biases via Topological Guidance

Long-horizon reasoning remains a central challenge for large language models (LLMs) under sparse-reward regimes. We argue that this brittleness arises from two biases induced by complex reasoning spaces: an exploration bias, where models are drawn toward locally plausible but structurally unstable branches, and a compounding bias, where small local deviations accumulate across depth and suppress rare rewards. We introduce Symbolic Closure Analysis (SCA) as a theoretical lens characterizing how branching structures and sparse rewards induce these biases in long-horizon reasoning with local admissibility, and as a design principle for structural priors in less formal reasoning tasks. Motivated by this analysis, we propose SAGE (Structural Admissibility-Guided Exploration), a unified framework that injects structural guidance to alleviate exploration bias and compounding bias in long-horizon reasoning. SAGE combines two complementary structural guidance: algebraic sparsification, which projects locally admissible candidates onto operator-indexed algebraic subspaces to suppress spurious branching and mitigate exploration bias, and hyperbolic structural guidance, which embeds reasoning states into a negatively curved space to provide dense depth-wise signals and mitigate compounding bias. Across 12 benchmarks and 7 model families, SAGE outperforms competitive baselines. In particular, SAGE achieves up to an 8-fold improvement on the Andrews-Curtis problem, an open real-world long-horizon task. Code is available at: https://github.com/Susan571/SAGE-NeurIPS2026.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Can AI Reviewers See Your Efforts to Improve Your Paper? A Large-Scale Study of Paper Revision Trajectories

AI reviewers are increasingly used to assess scientific manuscripts, yet it remains unclear whether their judgments reflect the improvements authors make through revision. We investigate this question using PaperTrajectory-2026, the 2026 release of PaperTrajectory, a dataset of 6,959 paper trajectories across five AI conferences, with automatic annotations of changes along 14 dimensions and separate judgments of overall quality. The annotations show that major improvements emphasize empirical evidence and framing, while later revisions tend toward incremental improvement. Using independent assessments of manuscript versions from eight AI reviewers, we examine whether annotated major improvements receive higher scores, which revision dimensions are associated with score changes, and whether user opinions can outweigh observed revision gains. Every reviewer leaves scores unchanged on most major improvements, and agreement on the direction of score changes is weak. Revision dimensions show some reviewer-specific associations with score increases, but provide limited predictive discrimination and no consistent guide across reviewers. Even when a revision earns a higher neutral score, a brief negative user opinion can erase or reverse that advantage, with substantial variation across reviewers. These findings show that substantive revisions are not consistently reflected in review scores and that observed scoring gains can be vulnerable to user framing, motivating assessments that connect manuscript evidence to overall judgments and remain stable when no scientific evidence changes.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Navigating Ideation Space: Decomposed Conceptual Representations for Positioning Scientific Ideas

Scientific discovery requires new ideas to be situated within an ever-expanding landscape of existing knowledge. An emerging challenge is how to identify conceptually relevant prior work from rapidly growing literature, and assess how a new idea differentiates from existing research. Current embedding approaches typically conflate distinct conceptual aspects into single representations and cannot support fine-grained retrieval; meanwhile, LLM-based evaluators are subject to sycophancy biases, failing to provide discriminative novelty assessment. We introduce the Ideation Space, a structured representation that decomposes scientific knowledge into three distinct dimensions learned through contrastive training. Our framework enables principled measurement of conceptual distance between ideas and modeling of ideation transitions that capture the logical connections within an idea. Building upon this representation, we propose a Hierarchical Sub-Space Retrieval framework for efficient, targeted literature retrieval, and a Decomposed Novelty Assessment algorithm that identifies which aspects of an idea are novel. Extensive experiments demonstrate substantial improvements, achieving Recall@30 of 0.329 (16.7% over the strongest baseline), and novelty assessment achieves promising correlation with expert judgments, outperforming all open-source LLM baselines up to 70B.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

CanvasObs: Structured Spatial Observation for Agent Editing on 2D Infinite Canvases

Editing agents on 2D infinite canvases must reason about application state that pixels may not reveal. Targets may be offscreen or covered, while visual containment and touching arrows may disagree with recorded frame membership or connector bindings. We ask how a structured observation layer can support accurate object selection during agentic editing on 2D infinite canvases. We present CanvasObs, which augments visual context with a structured payload and guidance for reading four components: Identity & State, Visibility & Structure, Relations, and Offscreen Object bounds in action coordinates. A Remote Team Handoff case study illustrates retrieving an editable offscreen copy, choosing a covered chart by color, separating cards by frame membership, and preserving an evidence connection. We turn these cases into ten controlled configurations and compare CanvasObs with the baseline agent in 1,200 browser trials across three models. CanvasObs improves Correct target for every model. Combined across models, it raises Correct target from 16.5% to 48.3%, an increase of 31.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval [29.0, 34.7]), and Full task success from 4.3% to 25.0%. These results show that compact structured observation can improve object choice on 2D infinite canvases without redesigning the editing pipeline.

cs.HC↗
arXiv2026

ForkCast: Predictive Recovery for Vision-Language-Action Policies via Counterfactual Futures

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies perform manipulation tasks using camera images and language instructions, but object slip or visual occlusion can disrupt execution. Recovery is typically learned during policy training or delegated to a monitor that triggers a scripted repair after detecting a failure. We introduce ForkCast, a predictive recovery framework that compares counterfactual futures to determine whether and how to intervene in a frozen VLA policy. At each decision point, ForkCast evaluates three candidates: executing the policy's nominal action chunk (Commit), adjusting the camera viewpoint (Reobserve), and replanning the arm trajectory (Replan). A candidate-conditioned world model forecasts the latent outcome of each candidate at a common future horizon, and a shared task-progress head scores the predicted outcomes. By evaluating the policy's own continuation alongside the repair candidates, a single comparison based on task progress determines both whether and how to intervene, without a failure detector, an intervention threshold, or updates to the VLA backbone. On five simulated RoboTwin 2.0 tasks with injected occlusion and object slip, ForkCast increases pooled success from 13.3% for the frozen $π_{0.5}$ policy to 30.0% and transfers to two additional VLA backbones without updating ForkCast. After adaptation on real-robot candidate rollouts, ForkCast also improves success over the base policy under both clean and visibility-limited conditions. Code will be released to benefit the research community.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Small but Mighty: Test Suites as Improvement Signals for Self-Evolving Agents

A self-evolving agent rewrites its own harness and must decide which rewrites to keep, so its improvement signal is the check a rewrite has to pass. Verifying a rewrite by agent rollout is expensive and subjective, while executable checks such as the repository's own tests are too sparse to catch behavior-changing rewrites, rejecting only a quarter of them. We instead take test feedback as the executable signal, and search for test suites that are both small and strong with a quality-diversity evolutionary algorithm, so that the signal is dense and informative. TeSearch treats suite size as a behavior descriptor, so that quality is pursued at every size and a small, strong suite is reachable, and learns a transition kernel during the search that denoises the LLM as an actuator on that descriptor. Across 129 real-world modules and three backbones, TeSearch delivers the highest-quality suites of any method compared, LLM-driven evolutionary search included, and the smallest of any LLM-based one. Used as the improvement signal of a self-evolving agent, it rejects 59.9% of behavior-changing rewrites against 25.3% for the repository's tests, at a 4.0% false-alarm rate and 3.5 s per decision. The code and data are available at https://github.com/ccsnow127/TeSearch.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Optimize Once, Execute Fast: Latency-Aware Multi-Agent Workflow Learning for Recurrent Queries

Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-based MAS) have shown remarkable success in solving complex tasks by coordinating specialized agents through multi-step workflows. To overcome the high cost and specificity of manually designed workflows, recent research has shifted toward learning them automatically. However, a key limitation remains: while agent calls introduce significant latency due to model inference time and service congestion, most automated methods optimize solely for downstream performance, ignoring execution time (makespan). This issue is amplified when workflows are reused across recurring queries, making latency accumulate over time. This limits deployment in recurrent applications such as AI customer support and AI cloud troubleshooting, where users expect fast responses. To bridge this gap, we introduce a new problem, termed latency-aware workflow generation, where the objective is to minimize workflow makespan while aiming to retain downstream performance. We propose LAWA (Latency-Aware Workflow optimizAtion), a novel framework that reduces makespan via theoretically grounded graph edits targeting critical-path bottlenecks. By unifying a graph generator with this graph-editing procedure, LAWA supports both de novo workflow generation and refinement of existing ones. Empirical results across seven benchmarks demonstrate that LAWA significantly reduces makespan while achieving competitive task performance, supporting efficient reuse of multi-agent workflows for recurrent queries.

cs.MA↗
arXiv2026

Looking Inside LLMs: Small-World Connectivity as a Signature of Reasoning Performance

Understanding large language model (LLM) reasoning requires looking beyond behavioral performance to examine how reasoning ability is reflected in internal organization. Inspired by neuroscience findings linking higher intelligence to stronger small-world organization in functional brain networks, we investigate small-world connectivity as a structural signature of LLM reasoning. We construct functional graphs from attention-head activation similarities and find that a higher small-world index (SWI), capturing local clustering and short global paths, consistently correlates with better fluid reasoning performance across models and training checkpoints. Since local clustering is central to small-world organization, we further examine how heads important for model performance connect within and across communities. We find that these heads tend to have a larger share of connection weight within their own communities (high core scores) and a more concentrated weight distribution across communities (low bridge scores). These observations motivate the hypothesis that high core and low bridge scores serve as structural indicators of head importance for reasoning capability. We validate this hypothesis through pruning, introducing Small-World Allocation (SWA), a hierarchical sparsity allocation method guided by these scores. Across six LLMs, SWA better preserves small-world organization and model performance than competing allocation strategies, reducing WikiText perplexity by up to 20%. Together, these findings identify small-world functional connectivity as a measurable signature of LLM reasoning performance, offering a structural perspective that complements behavioral evaluation.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Overcoming Prior Barriers: Supervised Fine-Tuning under Long-Tail Distribution

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) adapts pretrained large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks, but the required concepts can receive substantially different levels of pretrained support. Frequent concepts are more likely to be well learned, whereas rare concepts may remain weakly represented. We introduce a novel notion named prior barrier to quantify how strongly the pretrained model supports competing concepts over the target concept. We observe that prior barriers follow a long-tail distribution, placing head and tail concepts at different starting points for SFT: head concepts face lower prior barriers, whereas tail concepts require additional instructions to overcome their higher prior barriers. Our theoretical analysis further derives a predictive risk bound for SFT under long-tail prior barriers, explicitly characterizing how the prior barrier and accumulated SFT evidence jointly determine predictive performance. Motivated by this prior barrier-dependent demand, we propose PASS, an adaptive SFT instruction selection method that constructs reference-derived concepts and estimates the distinguishing evidence provided by each instruction, and adaptively allocates the selection budget toward concepts that remain insufficiently covered under the current selection. In this way, PASS jointly considers which instructions can provide useful evidence and where additional supervision is needed under a limited budget. Experiments show that our method consistently outperforms seven state-of-the-art instruction selection methods on four backbone-budget settings. An ablation study further shows that PASS's adaptive allocation consistently improves over uniform allocation.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

ForkPilot: Self-Evolving Policy for Retrospective Search in Long-Horizon Agents

Interactive language-model agents increasingly solve complex tasks through long-horizon, multi-call reasoning, where errors in beliefs or actions can compound across tool interactions. Retrospective search can recover from such failures but is prone to misallocation. Delayed outcomes obscure the contribution of intermediate search decisions, leading to Attribution Complexity, while evolving execution evidence leads to Adaptation Complexity, where previously learned estimates become stale. To address these challenges, we first introduce Search Value Dynamics (SVD), which characterizes the evolving trade-off between the gain and cost of retrospective search. Building on SVD, we propose ForkPilot, a self-evolving two-stage policy-learning framework. In the first stage, ForkPilot learns a search-value policy offline from completed trajectories through automatically constructed outcome comparisons. In the second stage, it makes search decisions based on current observations and then self-evolves by incorporating newly completed trajectories into subsequent policy updates. We evaluate ForkPilot across 6 diverse benchmarks and 7 widely used LLM backbone families, including four open-source families, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Opus 4.8 in a production agentic system, against 9 competitive baselines, including a real-world harness deployment used by hundreds of thousands of paid users. ForkPilot achieves comparable state-of-the-art performance while reducing token usage by up to 59.2%, demonstrating its efficacy.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

A Missing Piece for Trustworthy AI Reviewers: From Benchmarking Rhetorical Robustness to SciCore Review

AI reviewers can assign different judgments to manuscripts that report the same science in different wording, potentially rewarding rhetorical optimization over scientific improvement. We formulate Rhetorical Robustness as the joint requirement of stability across content-preserving rewrites and discrimination across papers. We introduce RobustReview, a controlled full-manuscript benchmark with 1,260 manuscript versions, and evaluate 30 reviewer configurations. The benchmark reveals false robustness, where low rewrite sensitivity coincides with score collapse across papers, and shows that human alignment and rhetorical robustness rank reviewers differently. Moreover, the evaluated content-focused prompting protocol does not consistently improve robustness across backbones. Motivated by these findings, we introduce SciCore, a dual-branch reviewer that averages a full-manuscript judgment with a judgment based on an extracted, structured science core. This design combines manuscript-level assessment with a content-normalized view intended to reduce rhetorical sensitivity. In our primary GPT-5.5 comparison, SciCore achieves a leading joint stability-discrimination profile among the benchmarked reviewers while maintaining competitive human alignment. These results identify rhetorical robustness as a distinct evaluation target and demonstrate the potential of science-core review to improve it.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

When the Wrong Key Wins: Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in LLMs

Large language models can hallucinate even when the knowledge required for a correct answer is already available. We study this failure through a latent-key view of inference, where answer selection depends on competition among associations acquired during pretraining. We show that model predictions can be highly sensitive to individual query keywords, that these influential keywords exhibit entity-specific binding, and that their effects are systematically shaped by pretraining frequency. Multiple bindings can also compete and exhibit higher-order interactions within the same query. Based on this mechanism, we introduce a two-stage keyword-perturbation method for hallucination detection. By removing influential keywords and measuring how the model reorganizes its prediction, the method distinguishes errors caused by misleading key associations from correct decisions supported by diagnostic evidence. Across multiple models and benchmarks, perturbation provides a strong and transferable detection signal, reaching $0.910$ AUROC on probe-known ScientistQA. Finally, we extend the same probabilistic framework to four hallucination regimes: knowledge deficit, wrong knowledge, context distraction, and unstable inference. Their operational distributions across benchmarks provide diagnostic context for why different detector families succeed in different settings.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

ReGDiff: Guided Diffusion in Regulated Latent Space for Exploring Metamaterial Voxel Geometry

Metamaterials are artificially engineered structures whose mechanical and physical behaviors are strongly shaped by geometry rather than composition. Voxel representation provides a unified format for metamaterial geometry generation, as it can express diverse classes such as truss, shell, and porous structures within a single cubic discretization. However, voxel-based generation faces a plausibility-novelty trade-off: staying close to known geometries helps preserve geometric regularities, while moving away from them is necessary for novelty but may produce degenerate geometries. To address this challenge, we propose REGDIFF, a generative framework that couples voxel representation with latent space regulation and guided diffusion. REGDIFF introduces a repel-and-sink (RAS) mechanism to smooth the latent distribution of plausible geometries, and short-range repulsion (SRR) guidance to discourage generation overly close to known samples while maintaining geometric plausibility. We further contribute a voxel-based benchmark covering truss- and shell-type metamaterial geometries, together with an evaluation module for geometric plausibility, novelty, and diversity. Experiments show that REGDIFF outperforms voxel-based generative baselines, achieving +8.9% in geometric plausibility, +46.4% in novelty, and +128.6% in diversity on average across two datasets. These results suggest that REGDIFF is a strong geometry candidate generator for downstream evaluation. Our code is provided at https://github.com/wzhan24/ReGDiff.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

The Emerging AI Paper-Review Arms Race: Adversarial Co-Evolution in Scholarly Publishing

Generative and agentic AI are reshaping both the production and evaluation of scientific research. These developments are often studied separately, as questions of how AI can produce research and how AI can review it. We argue that this separation misses an increasingly important feature of scholarly publishing: changes on one side alter the incentives, constraints, and behavior of the other. We synthesize 230 scholarly publications and institutional records using a taxonomy of six connected dynamics: production scaling, evaluation automation, evaluation manipulation, defense mechanisms and policy responses, evasion and side effects, and long-horizon ecosystem feedback. The literature shows an emerging progression in which cheaper and faster research production increases pressure on evaluation, AI-mediated evaluation becomes more scalable and repeatable, participants can exploit evaluator regularities, and institutions respond with technical safeguards and policy controls. These responses can in turn induce evasion, redistribute errors and workload, and shape the scholarly records reused by future research and evaluation systems. Evidence is strongest for production and evaluation at scale, reproducible manipulation, and institutional response, while post-policy adaptation and artifact-level long-horizon feedback remain less directly observed. This systems view shifts attention from isolated AI capabilities toward how scholarly actors and AI systems adapt to one another over time.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

HypRQ-VAE: Hyperbolic Item Indexing for Long-Tail-Aware Generative Recommender Systems

Sequential recommender systems model user behavior as item ID sequences, while recent generative methods cast recommendation as a language modeling task using large language models (LLMs). While this paradigm incorporates rich textual semantics, it introduces a fundamental mismatch: LLMs operate on text tokens, whereas recommender systems depend on discrete item indices. This misalignment often leads to hallucinations in generative recommendations. Existing methods attempt to bridge this gap by learning item vocabularies in Euclidean space, but they struggle to model the inherent long-tail distribution of real-world catalogs, where a small number of head items dominate, and a vast number of tail items reflect users' niche preferences. To address this issue, we introduce Hyperbolic Residual-Quantized Variational AutoEncoder (HypRQ-VAE), the first framework to learn item indexing in hyperbolic space. HypRQ-VAE leverages the unique properties of hyperbolic geometry, whose exponential volume expansion naturally accommodates the power law structure of user-item interactions. This allows the model to encode rich textual semantics while preserving the representational fidelity of sparse, long-tail items. Experiments on three benchmark datasets show that HypRQ-VAE significantly improves the performance of recommendation, particularly in recommending tail items. Our analysis attributes these gains to the superior capacity of hyperbolic space to model item hierarchies and sparsity in generative recommendation. Our code and data are available at: https://github.com/wulongfeng/HypRQ-VAE.

cs.IR↗
arXiv2026

How Can Rhetoric Reward-Hack AI Reviewers? Dissecting Rhetorical Sensitivity in AI-Based Peer Review

As large language models increasingly participate in scientific evaluation, we investigate a potential form of reward hacking: how rhetorical choices shape AI-review judgments when reported scientific content is preserved and how these effects vary across evaluation conditions. We construct a controlled corpus of 4,200 full-paper manuscripts derived from 120 anonymized ICLR 2026 submissions. Two LLM rewriters transform six rhetorical dimensions in opposing directions, and five LLM reviewers evaluate the resulting manuscripts under standard and strict protocols. We also test joint, recursive, and reviewer-guided rewriting. Our results show that rhetorical sensitivity is structured rather than uniform. Evidence framing and novelty stance produce the largest positive-negative contrasts in overall assessment, with scope framing forming a weaker second tier; the remaining dimensions have smaller or less stable effects. This hierarchy persists across human-assessed quality levels, but score movement depends strongly on the AI reviewer's original score: lower scores tend to rise, higher scores tend to fall, and directional contrasts are clearest in the middle ranges. More elaborate workflows do not reliably yield larger gains. Joint rewriting is strongly rewriter-dependent, reviewer guidance does not consistently outperform an unguided second pass, and repeated rewriting yields diminishing, configuration-dependent returns. Across conditions, the rewriter primarily determines the separation between opposing variants, whereas the reviewer determines the magnitude and sign of their score effects. Strict review lowers mean OA by 1.36 points without consistently changing rhetorical sensitivity. These findings identify when rhetorical presentation influences AI scientific review and motivate evaluation systems robust to content-preserving variation in scientific writing.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Cognitive Episodes in LLM Reasoning Traces Enable Interpretable Human Item Difficulty Prediction

Predicting human item difficulty is central to educational assessment, where reliable estimates support fairness and effective test construction. Existing methods often depend on costly human calibration or item-level textual representations, providing limited evidence about the cognitive processes that make items difficult. We argue that difficulty should be viewed not only as a property of item text, but also as an observable consequence of the problem-solving burden an item induces. Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) offer scalable process evidence through reasoning traces, but such evidence must be structured to support interpretable modeling. To this end, we introduce Epi2Diff (Episode to Difficulty), a framework that maps LRM reasoning traces into cognitively grounded episode sequences. These episodes group trace segments into functional problem-solving states, enabling difficulty to be modeled through reasoning scale, effort allocation, and state transitions. Epi2Diff extracts compact episode-dynamic features and combines them with semantic item representations for human difficulty prediction. Experiments on four real-world human difficulty datasets show that Epi2Diff consistently outperforms strong baselines, including fine-tuned small language models, LLM in-context learning, and supervised LLM adaptation. On SAT-derived classification benchmarks, Epi2Diff achieves an 8.1% average relative gain over supervised LLM fine-tuning baselines. Further analyses show that harder items induce more effortful, iterative, and implementation-centered episode dynamics, rather than merely longer responses. These results demonstrate that cognitive episodes in LRM reasoning traces provide a predictive and interpretable process representation for human item difficulty, offering a new lens for educational measurement with reasoning models.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

LLMs Struggle to Measure What Distinguishes Students of Different Proficiency Levels: A Study of Item Discrimination in Reading Comprehension Assessment

Existing work on LLM-based educational assessment has focused largely on item difficulty, but difficulty alone does not indicate whether an item meaningfully distinguishes higher- from lower-proficiency students. Item discrimination captures this complementary and fundamental psychometric property. We investigate whether LLMs can predict human item discrimination from assessment content. We evaluate 42 proprietary and open-weight LLMs using two complementary approaches. Direct discrimination prediction asks models to explicitly predict an item's discrimination value, while response-based proxy estimation treats LLM answers as synthetic responses and applies a Classical Test Theory (CTT)-inspired item-rest calculation. Direct predictions show weak alignment with human item discrimination. The response-based proxy provides a stronger but still limited ranking signal, reaching a CEFR-stratified rank correlation of 0.231. Further analysis shows that this correlation comes mainly from differences across models rather than proficiency prompts that reliably simulate students at different ability levels. Current LLMs therefore contain some discrimination-relevant information, but they do not yet reliably model the ability-conditioned human response behavior that gives item discrimination its psychometric meaning.

cs.CL↗