Partial Hyperbolicity and Homoclinic Tangencies
We show that any diffeomorphism of a compact manifold can be C1 approximated by diffeomorphisms exhibiting a homoclinic tangency or by diffeomorphisms having a partial hyperbolic structure.
math.DS↗
arXiv subjects
Dawei Yang
Publications and source records attributed to Dawei Yang.
Stably weakly shadowing transitive sets and dominated splittings
We prove that for any $C^1$-stably weakly shadowing transitive set $Λ$, either $Λ$ is a sink or a source, or $Λ$ admits a dominated splitting.
math.DS↗
On the existence of attractors
On every compact 3-manifold, we build a non-empty open set $\cU$ of $\Diff^1(M)$ such that, for every $r\geq 1$, every $C^r$-generic diffeomorphism $f\in\cU\cap \Diff^r(M)$ has no topological attractors. On higher dimensional manifolds, one may require that $f$ has neither topological attractors nor topological repellers. Our examples have finitely many quasi attractors. For flows, we may require that these quasi attractors contain singular points. Finally we discuss alternative definitions of attractors which may be better adapted to generic dynamics.
math.DS↗
Expansive homoclinic classes
We prove that for $C^1$ generic diffeomorphisms, every expansive homoclinic class is hyperbolic.
math.DS↗
Multi-parameter estimating photometric redshifts with artificial neural networks
We calculate photometric redshifts from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 2 Galaxy Sample using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Different input patterns based on various parameters (e.g. magnitude, color index, flux information) are explored and their performances for redshift prediction are compared. For ANN technique, any parameter may be easily incorporated as input, but our results indicate that using dereddening magnitude produces photometric redshift accuracies often better than the Petrosian magnitude or model magnitude. Similarly, the model magnitude is also superior to Petrosian magnitude. In addition, ANNs also show better performance when the more effective parameters increase in the training set. Finally, the method is tested on a sample of 79, 346 galaxies from the SDSS DR2. When using 19 parameters based on the dereddening magnitude, the rms error in redshift estimation is sigma(z)=0.020184. The ANN is highly competitive tool when compared with traditional template-fitting methods where a large and representative training set is available.
astro-ph↗