arXiv subjects

Davood Wadi

Publications and source records attributed to Davood Wadi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Whom Do AI Agents Work For? Role Assignment Induces Sponsorship Bias in LLM Recommenders

Large language models (LLMs) now serve as conversational shopping assistants on platforms that also sell advertising. These AI agents face a conflict of duty. They advise consumers who rely on their judgment, yet are deployed by platforms that benefit when sponsored listings are chosen. Sponsorship disclosures, designed to allow consumers to penalize paid placements, now reach the AI agent rather than the consumer, and the agent's evaluation of them is hidden from the consumer. Drawing on the fiduciary concept of conflict of duty, we argue that an agent's evaluation of a sponsored listing should not depend on which party deployed it. In controlled choice experiments, we manipulate assigned roles in the system prompt to name either a traveler or a booking platform as the agent's principal. Platform delegation significantly attenuates the penalty that agents apply to sponsored listings and weakens the skepticism that disclosure triggers in their reasoning traces. We replicate out findings across LLMs and reasoning depths. A second study decomposes the disclosure label and shows that the divergence between the two delegates widens significantly when the paid placement is attributed to the platform. Stricter terminology ("Sponsored" instead of "Promoted") lowers choice of paid listings but does not close this gap when the platform is named. The findings show that disclosure mandates designed for human consumers cannot by themselves protect consumers in AI-mediated commerce.

econ.GN↗

arXiv2026

Does Rank Still Matter? Position Bias When AI Agents Shop on Our Behalf

Search rankings are valuable because human attention is scarce and sequential. Higher-placed alternatives are easier to find, so they are examined and bought more often. Consumers are now delegating search to AI agents that can ingest an entire results page at once. Randomizing the order of one hundred hotel listings across 5,000 AI agent sessions, we compare four large language models against human field data. AI agents search more deeply than humans and never decline to buy. Position still predicts which listings are inspected, but weakly and non-monotonically: the middle of a results page has the lowest probability of inspection, not the bottom. Position reaches the choice stage for some models and not others, a heterogeneity that tracks neither provider nor capability. All models nonetheless converge on the same undominated listing. For agentic search, the attributes displayed on a results page matter more than placement within it.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Every Token Counts: Exact Likert-Scale Distributions for Measuring LLM Attitudes and Biases

As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents, accurately evaluating their latent values and biases is critical. The NLP community typically evaluates models using large, unstructured benchmarks. While effective for general capabilities, these datasets fundamentally conflate causal mechanisms: even when an aggregate bias is detected, unstructured evaluations cannot disentangle whether it stems from baseline traits, contextual confounders, or complex interactions. To address this, we introduce an analytically exact framework for the controlled behavioral evaluation of LLMs. We bridge human psychometrics with LLM mechanics by resolving gaps in design, measurement, and analysis. First, we replace unstructured prompting with fully crossed factorial experiments to systematically isolate causal main and interaction effects. Second, we eliminate Monte Carlo text sampling noise by operating directly on exact, token-level Probability Mass Functions (PMFs). Third, we derive a multivariate ordinal consensus metric and a distributional ANOVA to process these PMFs analytically. We validate our framework with a case study on consumer ethnocentrism across five LLMs, demonstrating how our approach isolates systemic country-of-origin biases that aggregate benchmarks otherwise obscure.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2023

Read the Signs: Towards Invariance to Gradient Descent's Hyperparameter Initialization

We propose ActiveLR, an optimization meta algorithm that localizes the learning rate, $α$, and adapts them at each epoch according to whether the gradient at each epoch changes sign or not. This sign-conscious algorithm is aware of whether from the previous step to the current one the update of each parameter has been too large or too small and adjusts the $α$ accordingly. We implement the Active version (ours) of widely used and recently published gradient descent optimizers, namely SGD with momentum, AdamW, RAdam, and AdaBelief. Our experiments on ImageNet, CIFAR-10, WikiText-103, WikiText-2, and PASCAL VOC using different model architectures, such as ResNet and Transformers, show an increase in generalizability and training set fit, and decrease in training time for the Active variants of the tested optimizers. The results also show robustness of the Active variant of these optimizers to different values of the initial learning rate. Furthermore, the detrimental effects of using large mini-batch sizes are mitigated. ActiveLR, thus, alleviates the need for hyper-parameter search for two of the most commonly tuned hyper-parameters that require heavy time and computational costs to pick. We encourage AI researchers and practitioners to use the Active variant of their optimizer of choice for faster training, better generalizability, and reducing carbon footprint of training deep neural networks.

cs.LG↗