arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Davis A. Rens

Publications and source records attributed to Davis A. Rens.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Short-Range Modulated Electron Lattice and d-Wave Superconductivity in Cuprates: A Phenomenological Ginzburg-Landau Framework

A short-range charge modulation near 0.3 reciprocal lattice units along the Cu-O bond is present in every hole-doped cuprate family. Resonant x-ray scattering now shows that superconductivity does two opposite things to it at once: below Tc the modulation weakens yet becomes more phase coherent. We trace this split to symmetry: the modulation's envelope carries lattice momentum, which leaves a d-wave condensate exactly two ways to couple to it at quartic order, through the modulation's amplitude or through its phase. The first moves amplitude, coherence, and superfluid stiffness together; the second buys coherence at the expense of stiffness, so the two are separately measurable. We call this Ginzburg-Landau framework the modulated electron lattice (MEL). Classical Monte Carlo on 120x120 lattices with quenched disorder places the x-ray observation, read as a single component, at competing amplitude coupling and cooperative phase coupling, where the model gives no stiffness gain. But the measured intensity sums bond-centred and site-centred components. A two-component simulation gives the same pair of bulk signatures, intensity down and coherence up, both with a stiffness loss and with a stiffness gain, depending on the strength of the bond channel. Bulk data therefore cannot say whether this charge order stiffens the superconductor or softens it. What settles the question is the bond-channel amplitude, which form-factor-resolved scattering and phase-resolved tunnelling measure. The response follows the local pairing amplitude, so its onset need not be sharp at Tc. We also compute vortex pinning in the modulated landscape and obtain an in-plane penetration depth of about 124 nm once the transition temperature fixes the energy scale. This version corrects the first: its linear envelope coupling was symmetry-forbidden, and all numerical results are new.

cond-mat.supr-con

A Modulated Electron Lattice (MEL) Criterion for Metallic Superconductivity

A central unresolved question in the theory of superconductivity is why only a small subset of metallic elements exhibit a superconducting state, whereas many others remain strictly normal. Neither the conventional Bardeen Cooper Schrieffer (BCS) framework nor its extensions involving charge density wave (CDW) or pair density wave (PDW) order provide a predictive or material-selective criterion capable of distinguishing superconducting metals from non-superconducting ones. In particular, the persistent absence of superconductivity in simple noble metals with well-defined Fermi surfaces poses a challenge for all traditional approaches. Here we address this problem using the Modulated Electron Lattice (MEL) Ginzburg Landau (GL) framework introduced in our previous work. In this formulation, a coarse-grained MEL charge field $ρ_{\mathrm{MEL}}(\mathbf{r})$ with momentum dependent stiffness $α(q)$ is coupled to the superconducting (SC) order parameter $ψ(\mathbf{r})$. We show that metallic superconductivity emerges only when the system satisfies a specific ``MEL enhancement window,'' characterized by a negative minimum of $α(q)$ at either a finite modulation wave vector $q^{\ast}$ or at $q=0$, together with sufficiently strong coupling between $ρ_{\mathrm{MEL}}$ and $ψ$. This unified criterion naturally partitions metallic elements into three universal classes: (i) MEL-enhanced superconductors with a finite-$q^{\ast}$ charge mode, (ii) conventional BCS superconductors as the homogeneous $q^{\ast}=0$ limit of the MEL framework, and (iii) metals for which $α(q)$ remains positive for all $q$, suppressing all MEL modes and preventing any superconducting instability. By applying this criterion to simple metallic elements, we identify why some metals develop superconductivity while others do not, possibly resolving a selection problem long open within the BCS paradigm.

cond-mat.supr-con