arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

David Sirkin

Publications and source records attributed to David Sirkin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Bring Buttons Back: Physical Interfaces for the Age of Automation

As AI starts to permeate everyday life, deployment focuses on embedding intelligence in the background, abstracting away controls, and leaving automated decision-making opaque, with few obvious opportunities for human intervention. Where interfaces remain, design has drifted toward abstract, screen-based control, replacing material interaction with menu navigation. These shifts weaken the coupling between human action and system state, eroding operators' ability to understand, anticipate, and intervene in automated systems. We introduce Physically Stateful Interfaces (PSIs), a design concept that re-imagines traditional controls, such as buttons, switches, and knobs, as actuated, bidirectional interface elements. Three foundational behaviors, Self/Reset, Resist/Hide, and Assert/Unhide, unify affordance, feedforward, and feedback into a single interaction point. Rather than static inputs whose impact and consequences must be read elsewhere on a screen, PSIs position physical controls as shared mediators between automated systems and human operators. As automated systems become increasingly capable, their interfaces need to be deliberately designed to center human agency, supporting deliberate choice while keeping automation legible, contestable, and overrideable.

cs.HC

AI Eyes on the Road: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Traffic Surveillance

AI-powered road surveillance systems are increasingly proposed to monitor infractions such as speeding, phone use, and jaywalking. While these systems promise to enhance safety by discouraging dangerous behaviors, they also raise concerns about privacy, fairness, and potential misuse of personal data. Yet empirical research on how people perceive AI-enhanced monitoring of public spaces remains limited. We conducted an online survey ($N=720$) using a 3$\times$3 factorial design to examine perceptions of three road surveillance modes -- conventional, AI-enhanced, and AI-enhanced with public shaming -- across China, Europe, and the United States. We measured perceived capability, risk, transparency, and acceptance. Results show that conventional surveillance was most preferred, while public shaming was least preferred across all regions. Chinese respondents, however, expressed significantly higher acceptance of AI-enhanced modes than Europeans or Americans. Our findings highlight the need to account for context, culture, and social norms when considering AI-enhanced monitoring, as these shape trust, comfort, and overall acceptance.

cs.HC