arXiv subjects

David Purser

Publications and source records attributed to David Purser.

17 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Representing One Letter Weighted Automata Over the Tropical Semiring

We consider weighted automata over the tropical semiring $\mathbb{Z}_\infty(min, +)$. Recently, it was shown that determinisation is decidable; in this paper we focus on the complexity when the alphabet is unary. In 2001, Lombardy showed this problem is decidable, a close inspection of his proof yields a coNP upper bound on the complexity. Earlier Gaubert showed that every weighted automaton in this setting can be effectively turned into an equivalent union of deterministic weighted automata. We prove Gaubert's result efficiently, presenting it as a generalisation of Chrobak's normal form for unary NFA. In particular, we prove that the equivalent union of deterministic weighted automata can be represented by a weighted automaton of quadratic size in the size of the original one, and this representation can be computed in polynomial time. Building on this, we show that determinisation, and even register minimisation (which generalises determinisation), is coNP-complete. We complete the paper with observations that the boundedness problem is also coNP-complete by reductions with determinisation. Lastly, we provide evidence that all of these problems are not FPT (by proving $coW_1$-hardness) when parametrised by the number of deterministic automata in the union.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2026

History-Constrained Systems

We study verification problems for history-constrained systems (HCS), a model of guarded computation that uses nested systems. An outer system describes the process architecture in which a sequence of actions represents the communication between sub-systems through a global bus. Actions are either permitted or blocked locally by guards; these guards read and decide based on the sequence of actions so far in the global bus. When HCS have both the outer systems and the local guard controllers modelled by finite automata, we show they have the same expressive power as regular languages and finite automata, but they are exponentially more succinct. We also analyse games on this model, representing the interaction between environment and controller, and show that solving such games is EXPTIME-complete, where the lower bound already holds for reachability/safety games and the upper bound holds for any $\omega$-regular winning condition. Finally, we consider HCS with guards of greater expressive power, Vector Addition Systems with States (VASS). We show that with deterministic coverability-VASS guards the reachability problem is EXPSPACE-complete, while with reachability-VASS the problem is undecidable.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2025

On the $p$-adic Skolem Problem

The Skolem Problem asks to determine whether a given linear recurrence sequence (LRS) has a zero term. Showing decidability of this problem is equivalent to giving an effective proof of the Skolem-Mahler-Lech Theorem, which asserts that a non-degenerate LRS has finitely many zeros. The latter result was proven over 90 years ago via an ineffective method showing that such an LRS has only finitely many $p$-adic zeros. In this paper we consider the problem of determining whether a given LRS has a $p$-adic zero, as well as the corresponding function problem of computing exact representations of all $p$-adic zeros. We present algorithms for both problems and report on their implementation. The output of the algorithms is unconditionally correct, and termination is guaranteed subject to the $p$-adic Schanuel Conjecture (a standard number-theoretic hypothesis concerning the $p$-adic exponential function). While these algorithms do not solve the Skolem Problem, they can be exploited to find natural-number and rational zeros under additional hypotheses. To illustrate this, we apply our results to show decidability of the Simultaneous Skolem Problem (determine whether two coprime linear recurrences have a common natural-number zero), again subject to the $p$-adic Schanuel Conjecture.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2025

Resolving Nondeterminism by Chance

History-deterministic automata are those in which nondeterministic choices can be correctly resolved stepwise: there is a strategy to select a continuation of a run given the next input letter so that if the overall input word admits some accepting run, then the constructed run is also accepting. Motivated by checking qualitative properties in probabilistic verification, we consider the setting where the resolver strategy can randomize and only needs to succeed with lower-bounded probability. We study the expressiveness of such stochastically-resolvable automata as well as consider the decision questions of whether a given automaton has this property. In particular, we show that it is undecidable to check if a given NFA is $\lambda$-stochastically resolvable. This problem is decidable for finitely-ambiguous automata. We also present complexity upper and lower bounds for several well-studied classes of automata for which this problem remains decidable.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2024

The Power of Counting Steps in Quantitative Games

We study deterministic games of infinite duration played on graphs and focus on the strategy complexity of quantitative objectives. Such games are known to admit optimal memoryless strategies over finite graphs, but require infinite-memory strategies in general over infinite graphs. We provide new lower and upper bounds for the strategy complexity of mean-payoff and total-payoff objectives over infinite graphs, focusing on whether step-counter strategies (sometimes called Markov strategies) suffice to implement winning strategies. In particular, we show that over finitely branching arenas, three variants of limsup mean-payoff and total-payoff objectives admit winning strategies that are based either on a step counter or on a step counter and an additional bit of memory. Conversely, we show that for certain liminf total-payoff objectives, strategies resorting to a step counter and finite memory are not sufficient. For step-counter strategies, this settles the case of all classical quantitative objectives up to the second level of the Borel hierarchy.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2023

Determinisation and Unambiguisation of Polynomially-Ambiguous Rational Weighted Automata

We study the determinisation and unambiguisation problems of weighted automata over the rational field: Given a weighted automaton, can we determine whether there exists an equivalent deterministic, respectively unambiguous, weighted automaton? Recent results by Bell and Smertnig show that the problem is decidable, however they do not provide any complexity bounds. We show that both problems are in PSPACE for polynomially-ambiguous weighted automata.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2023

History-deterministic Vector Addition Systems

We consider history-determinism, a restricted form of non-determinism, for Vector Addition Systems with States (VASS) when used as acceptors to recognise languages of finite words. History-determinism requires that the non-deterministic choices can be resolved on-the-fly; based on the past and without jeopardising acceptance of any possible continuation of the input word. Our results show that the history-deterministic (HD) VASS sit strictly between deterministic and non-deterministic VASS regardless of the number of counters. We compare the relative expressiveness of HD systems, and closure-properties of the induced language classes, with coverability and reachability semantics, and with and without $\varepsilon$-labelled transitions. Whereas in dimension 1, inclusion and regularity remain decidable, from dimension two onwards, HD-VASS with suitable resolver strategies, are essentially able to simulate 2-counter Minsky machines, leading to several undecidability results: It is undecidable whether a VASS is history-deterministic, or if a language equivalent history-deterministic VASS exists. Checking language inclusion between history-deterministic 2-VASS is also undecidable.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2023

The Big-O Problem for Max-Plus Automata is Decidable (PSPACE-Complete)

We show that the big-O problem for max-plus automata is decidable and PSPACE-complete. The big-O (or affine domination) problem asks whether, given two max-plus automata computing functions f and g, there exists a constant c such that f < cg+ c. This is a relaxation of the containment problem asking whether f < g, which is undecidable. Our decidability result uses Simon's forest factorisation theorem, and relies on detecting specific elements, that we call witnesses, in a finite semigroup closed under two special operations: stabilisation and flattening.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Model Checking Linear Dynamical Systems under Floating-point Rounding

We consider linear dynamical systems under floating-point rounding. In these systems, a matrix is repeatedly applied to a vector, but the numbers are rounded into floating-point representation after each step (i.e., stored as a fixed-precision mantissa and an exponent). The approach more faithfully models realistic implementations of linear loops, compared to the exact arbitrary-precision setting often employed in the study of linear dynamical systems. Our results are twofold: We show that for non-negative matrices there is a special structure to the sequence of vectors generated by the system: the mantissas are periodic and the exponents grow linearly. We leverage this to show decidability of $\omega$-regular temporal model checking against semialgebraic predicates. This contrasts with the unrounded setting, where even the non-negative case encompasses the long-standing open Skolem and Positivity problems. On the other hand, when negative numbers are allowed in the matrix, we show that the reachability problem is undecidable by encoding a two-counter machine. Again, this is in contrast with the unrounded setting where point-to-point reachability is known to be decidable in polynomial time.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2022

The boundedness and zero isolation problems for weighted automata over nonnegative rationals

We consider linear cost-register automata (equivalent to weighted automata) over the semiring of nonnegative rationals, which generalise probabilistic automata. The two problems of boundedness and zero isolation ask whether there is a sequence of words that converge to infinity and to zero, respectively. In the general model both problems are undecidable so we focus on the copyless linear restriction. There, we show that the boundedness problem is decidable. As for the zero isolation problem we need to further restrict the class. We obtain a model, where zero isolation becomes equivalent to universal coverability of orthant vector addition systems (OVAS), a new model in the VAS family interesting on its own. In standard VAS runs are considered only in the positive orthant, while in OVAS every orthant has its own set of vectors that can be applied in that orthant. Assuming Schanuel's conjecture is true, we prove decidability of universal coverability for three-dimensional OVAS, which implies decidability of zero isolation in a model with at most three independent registers.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2022

Skolem Meets Schanuel

The celebrated Skolem-Mahler-Lech Theorem states that the set of zeros of a linear recurrence sequence is the union of a finite set and finitely many arithmetic progressions. The corresponding computational question, the Skolem Problem, asks to determine whether a given linear recurrence sequence has a zero term. Although the Skolem-Mahler-Lech Theorem is almost 90 years old, decidability of the Skolem Problem remains open. The main contribution of this paper is an algorithm to solve the Skolem Problem for simple linear recurrence sequences (those with simple characteristic roots). Whenever the algorithm terminates, it produces a stand-alone certificate that its output is correct -- a set of zeros together with a collection of witnesses that no further zeros exist. We give a proof that the algorithm always terminates assuming two classical number-theoretic conjectures: the Skolem Conjecture (also known as the Exponential Local-Global Principle) and the $p$-adic Schanuel Conjecture. Preliminary experiments with an implementation of this algorithm within the tool \textsc{Skolem} point to the practical applicability of this method.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

Porous Invariants

We introduce the notion of porous invariants for multipath (or branching/nondeterministic) affine loops over the integers; these invariants are not necessarily convex, and can in fact contain infinitely many 'holes'. Nevertheless, we show that in many cases such invariants can be automatically synthesised, and moreover can be used to settle (non-)reachability questions for various interesting classes of affine loops and target sets.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2021

The Orbit Problem for Parametric Linear Dynamical Systems

We study a parametric version of the Kannan-Lipton Orbit Problem for linear dynamical systems. We show decidability in the case of one parameter and Skolem-hardness with two or more parameters. More precisely, consider a $d$-dimensional square matrix $M$ whose entries are algebraic functions in one or more real variables. Given initial and target vectors $u,v\in \mathbb{Q}^d$, the parametric point-to-point orbit problem asks whether there exist values of the parameters giving rise to a concrete matrix $N \in \mathbb{R}^{d\times d}$, and a positive integer $n\in \mathbb{N}$, such that $N^nu = v$. We show decidability for the case in which $M$ depends only upon a single parameter, and we exhibit a reduction from the well-known Skolem Problem for linear recurrence sequences, suggesting intractability in the case of two or more parameters.

cs.LO↗

arXiv2020

Reachability in Dynamical Systems with Rounding

We consider reachability in dynamical systems with discrete linear updates, but with fixed digital precision, i.e., such that values of the system are rounded at each step. Given a matrix $M \in \mathbb{Q}^{d \times d}$, an initial vector $x\in\mathbb{Q}^{d}$, a granularity $g\in \mathbb{Q}_+$ and a rounding operation $[\cdot]$ projecting a vector of $\mathbb{Q}^{d}$ onto another vector whose every entry is a multiple of $g$, we are interested in the behaviour of the orbit $\mathcal{O}={<}[x], [M[x]],[M[M[x]]],\dots{>}$, i.e., the trajectory of a linear dynamical system in which the state is rounded after each step. For arbitrary rounding functions with bounded effect, we show that the complexity of deciding point-to-point reachability---whether a given target $y \in\mathbb{Q}^{d}$ belongs to $\mathcal{O}$---is PSPACE-complete for hyperbolic systems (when no eigenvalue of $M$ has modulus one). We also establish decidability without any restrictions on eigenvalues for several natural classes of rounding functions.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

The Big-O Problem

Given two weighted automata, we consider the problem of whether one is big-O of the other, i.e., if the weight of every finite word in the first is not greater than some constant multiple of the weight in the second. We show that the problem is undecidable, even for the instantiation of weighted automata as labelled Markov chains. Moreover, even when it is known that one weighted automaton is big-O of another, the problem of finding or approximating the associated constant is also undecidable. Our positive results show that the big-O problem is polynomial-time solvable for unambiguous automata, coNP-complete for unlabelled weighted automata (i.e., when the alphabet is a single character) and decidable, subject to Schanuel's conjecture, when the language is bounded (i.e., a subset of $w_1^*\dots w_m^*$ for some finite words $w_1,\dots,w_m$) or when the automaton has finite ambiguity. On labelled Markov chains, the problem can be restated as a ratio total variation distance, which, instead of finding the maximum difference between the probabilities of any two events, finds the maximum ratio between the probabilities of any two events. The problem is related to $\varepsilon$-differential privacy, for which the optimal constant of the big-O notation is exactly $\exp(\varepsilon)$.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2019

The Complexity of Verifying Loop-Free Programs as Differentially Private

We study the problem of verifying differential privacy for loop-free programs with probabilistic choice. Programs in this class can be seen as randomized Boolean circuits, which we will use as a formal model to answer two different questions: first, deciding whether a program satisfies a prescribed level of privacy; second, approximating the privacy parameters a program realizes. We show that the problem of deciding whether a program satisfies $\varepsilon$-differential privacy is $coNP^{\#P}$-complete. In fact, this is the case when either the input domain or the output range of the program is large. Further, we show that deciding whether a program is $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private is $coNP^{\#P}$-hard, and in $coNP^{\#P}$ for small output domains, but always in $coNP^{\#P^{\#P}}$. Finally, we show that the problem of approximating the level of differential privacy is both $NP$-hard and $coNP$-hard. These results complement previous results by Murtagh and Vadhan showing that deciding the optimal composition of differentially private components is $\#P$-complete, and that approximating the optimal composition of differentially private components is in $P$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2018

Bisimilarity Distances for Approximate Differential Privacy

Differential privacy is a widely studied notion of privacy for various models of computation. Technically, it is based on measuring differences between probability distributions. We study $\epsilon,\delta$-differential privacy in the setting of labelled Markov chains. While the exact differences relevant to $\epsilon,\delta$-differential privacy are not computable in this framework, we propose a computable bisimilarity distance that yields a sound technique for measuring $\delta$, the parameter that quantifies deviation from pure differential privacy. We show this bisimilarity distance is always rational, the associated threshold problem is in NP, and the distance can be computed exactly with polynomially many calls to an NP oracle.

cs.FL↗