arXiv subjects

David McCoy

Publications and source records attributed to David McCoy.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Targeted Deep Survival Contrasts: Valid Inference for Treatment-Specific Survival Benefit with Neural Networks

Neural survival models are increasingly asked to support counterfactual claims---how much a treatment would change survival in a population---rather than only prognostic risk scores. Answering such questions from observational data requires valid inference for treatment-specific survival contrasts under confounding and covariate-dependent censoring, targets for which standard deep survival estimators are biased and provide no honest uncertainty. We propose Targeted Deep Survival Contrasts (TDSC), which extends Targeted Deep Architectures (TDA)---targeted maximum likelihood estimation embedded in a network's weight space---to the full vector of treatment-specific survival curves over a time grid, and hence to the benefit curve and the restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference. A single universal targeting path, one ridge projection of the stacked efficient influence functions onto closed-form last-layer gradients per iteration, simultaneously solves the projected estimating equations for all coordinates; a one-step residual top-up converts the plug-in into a doubly robust estimator of the unrestricted target; and a multiplier bootstrap yields simultaneous confidence bands for the benefit curve. We prove joint asymptotic linearity, band validity, and double robustness of the top-up for a cross-fitted variant requiring no Donsker conditions. Across seven Monte Carlo banks with confounded treatment, sign-varying effect heterogeneity, and dependent censoring, the TDSC plug-in attains nominal pointwise and simultaneous coverage with 35% lower MSE than a per-timepoint one-step (AIPCW) built from the same nuisance fits. Under a badly wrong outcome model the plug-in tracks its working parameter and its intervals fail (44% coverage), while the top-up restores nominal inference for the unrestricted causal target (94-95%)---and in-sample diagnostics separate the two regimes.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2026

Priority-Standardized Net Benefit: A Stage-Normalized Estimand for Hierarchical Composite Endpoints

Hierarchical composite endpoints analyzed with win statistics are increasingly used when outcomes differ in clinical importance and hard events are too rare to support a single-component primary endpoint. Their appeal is that the analysis respects a prespecified priority order; their less-stated vulnerability is that standard win summaries aggregate layer-specific information using reach probabilities, the fraction of treated-control pairs still tied at each layer. When upper layers are rare or highly tied, a frequently reached last layer can dominate the composite even if it is lowest priority and more vulnerable to bias or missingness, such as an open-label patient-reported outcome. We propose the Priority-Standardized Net Benefit (PSNB), an estimand that decomposes a hierarchical comparison into stage-conditional net benefits and recombines them with a prespecified priority/credibility charter rather than data-determined reach weights. We identify the methodological gap as across-layer aggregation, not within-layer comparison, and show that fixed weighted win-loss statistics remain mechanically reach-weighted; we develop an influence-function-based estimator and large-sample inference, with a ratio-scale companion (the Priority-Standardized Win Ratio); and we give design tools (a layer influence cap, tipping-point analysis, and charter-envelope sensitivity analysis) usable before unblinding. Simulations confirm nominal type I error, show PSNB is approximately invariant to large changes in reach when stage-conditional effects are held fixed, and show that late-layer bias and missingness sensitivity is governed by the charter rather than the reach distribution. At a sample size where the Win Ratio has about 90% power under broad benefit, PSNB with the baseline charters keeps pace, while power under final-layer-dominated benefit depends on the permitted last-layer weight.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2025

AI Progress Should Be Measured by Capability-Per-Resource, Not Scale Alone: A Framework for Gradient-Guided Resource Allocation in LLMs

This position paper challenges the "scaling fundamentalism" dominating AI research, where unbounded growth in model size and computation has led to unsustainable environmental impacts and widening resource inequality. We argue that LLM development should be fundamentally reoriented toward capability-per-resource rather than capability alone. We present a theoretical framework demonstrating that resource-allocation decisions guided by gradient influence patterns can dramatically improve efficiency throughout the AI lifecycle. Our analysis shows that in transformer-based models, where a small fraction of parameters exert outsized influence (following heavy-tailed distributions), three critical insights emerge: (1) updating only high-influence parameters strictly outperforms full-parameter tuning on a performance-per-resource basis; (2) simple gradient norms provide computationally efficient proxies for identifying these high-influence components; and (3) coordinated parameter and data selection yields multiplicative efficiency gains, potentially reducing resource requirements by orders of magnitude. Building on these theoretical foundations, we propose a two stage paradigm marginal-return pretraining for foundation developers and influence guided adaptation for downstream users bridged by gradient blueprints, metadata describing which parameters matter most for various tasks. This capability-per-resource perspective transforms what were once considered pragmatic hardware workarounds into theoretically optimal strategies, democratizing access to cutting-edge AI capabilities while significantly reducing environmental impact. By embedding resource consciousness into how we develop, adapt, and evaluate models, we can reshape AI progress toward a more sustainable and equitable future.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Data-Adaptive Identification of Effect Modifiers through Stochastic Shift Interventions and Cross-Validated Targeted Learning

In epidemiology, identifying subpopulations that are particularly vulnerable to exposures and those who may benefit differently from exposure-reducing interventions is essential. Factors such as age, gender-specific vulnerabilities, and physiological states such as pregnancy are critical for policymakers when setting regulatory guidelines. However, current semi-parametric methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects are often limited to binary exposures and can function as black boxes, lacking clear, interpretable rules for subpopulation-specific policy interventions. This study introduces a novel method that uses cross-validated targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) paired with a data-adaptive target parameter strategy to identify subpopulations with the most significant differential impact of simulated policy interventions that reduce exposure. Our approach is assumption-lean, allowing for the integration of machine learning while still yielding valid confidence intervals. We demonstrate the robustness of our methodology through simulations and application to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Our analysis of NHANES data on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and leukocyte telomere length (LTL) identified age as a significant effect modifier. Specifically, we found that exposure to 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCNB) consistently had a differential impact on LTL, with a one-standard deviation reduction in exposure leading to a more pronounced increase in LTL among younger populations compared to older ones. We offer our method as an open-source software package, EffectXshift, enabling researchers to investigate the effect modification of continuous exposures. The EffectXshift package provides clear and interpretable results, informing targeted public health interventions and policy decisions.

stat.ME↗

arXiv2023

Discovery of Critical Thresholds in Mixed Exposures and Estimation of Policy Intervention Effects using Targeted Learning

Traditional regulations of chemical exposure tend to focus on single exposures, overlooking the potential amplified toxicity due to multiple concurrent exposures. We are interested in understanding the average outcome if exposures were limited to fall under a multivariate threshold. Because threshold levels are often unknown a priori, we provide an algorithm that finds exposure threshold levels where the expected outcome is maximized or minimized. Because both identifying thresholds and estimating policy effects on the same data would lead to overfitting bias, we also provide a data-adaptive estimation framework, which allows for both threshold discovery and policy estimation. Simulation studies show asymptotic convergence to the optimal exposure region and to the true effect of an intervention. We demonstrate how our method identifies true interactions in a public synthetic mixture data set. Finally, we applied our method to NHANES data to discover metal exposures that have the most harmful effects on telomere length. We provide an implementation in the CVtreeMLE R package.

stat.ME↗