arXiv subjects

David Kipping

Publications and source records attributed to David Kipping.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

JWST Excludes Exomoons Down to 0.1 Earth Radii Around a Rocky, Temperate Exoplanet

To date, even with JWST, it has not been possible to test for exomoons as small as the Moon. Only two reported searches for exomoons around bound planets have been attempted with JWST, both of which relied on a single JWST transit. We suggest that the below expectation sensitivity to date is, in part, a product of the considerable intrinsic flexibility of the planet+moon transit model when confronted with a single event, and the presence of unanticipated systematic noise. To test this, we present a search around the rocky, temperate-zone exoplanet LP 890-9c using twelve JWST transits. We find no evidence for an exomoon but exclude $0.1R_{\oplus}$ moons to 95% confidence across the entire Hill region, representing by far the most sensitive search to date. Our limits exclude analogs to many real Solar System moons, such as Europa, Rhea and Umbriel. However, we emphasize that the close-in orbit of LP 890-9c (0.04au) would make any moons larger than ${\sim}0.1R_{\oplus}$ unlikely to survive for many Gyr due to tides. Regardless, our study firmly establishes that JWST can indeed probe down to remarkably small moons. Further, we find that even a single transit can deliver impressive limits, with the exception of one epoch that is contaminated by red noise. However, by pairing it with just one cleaner epoch, the sensitivity recovers to a level indistinguishable from any other pairing, which bodes well for a potential second JWST transit of Kepler-167e.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2026

ExoMOD I. A Forward Model for the Orbital Architecture of Kepler Multi-Planet Systems

Transit observations only detect planets with favorable, near edge-on orientation of orbits as seen by a distant observer, which leaves much freedom for various interpretations in terms of the underlying planetary system architecture. Here we forward model transit observations of the Kepler telescope to characterize the orbital properties of close-in planetary systems. We make sensible choices about the underlying distributions of planet radii, masses and orbital periods, parameterize the orbital excitation with the Angular Momentum Deficit (AMD), and adopt an accurate method to account for transit detection. The fits to Kepler's DR25 data are executed with {\tt MultiNest}. We find that the orbital period distributions of Kepler singles and multis are statistically different from each other -- possibly a consequence of Kepler's observational baseline. The observed gap complexity distribution is reproduced when planets in high multiplicity systems ($m \geq 5$) are assigned ideally correlated period ratios. The high-multiplicity systems probably retained a memory of their formation conditions. The gap complexity metric also helps to constrain the AMD distribution. We find that systems with positive radius monotonicities typically harbor smaller planets, as expected if the radius monotonicity is influenced by non-detections. A FGK dwarf in the Kepler field should host $\simeq 2.4 \pm 0.2$ planets on average with radii $0.5 < R_{\rm pl}/R_\oplus < 7$ and orbital periods $3<P_{\rm orb}<300$ d. For a detected planetary system, there is roughly a 50\% chance that Kepler transit observations missed at least one inner or intermediate-period planet.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2026

ExoMOD II. A Statistical Model of Transit Timing Variations in Kepler Multi-Planet Systems

In Paper I (Nesvorn\'y et al. 2026), we forward modeled transit observations of the Kepler telescope to characterize the orbital properties of close-in planetary systems. The new population model, ExoMOD, was calibrated on Kepler's DR25 data. Here we use ExoMOD to statistically predict Transit Timing Variations (TTVs) from gravitationally interacting planets in the close-in systems, and compare these predictions with TTVs actually detected in the Kepler data. We find that planet-planet interactions are not expected to produce significant {\it short-period} TTVs, $P_{\rm TTV}/P_{\rm orb}<10$, where $P_{\rm TTV}$ and $P_{\rm orb}$ are the TTV and orbital periods, often enough to explain the short-period TTV signals inferred from the Kepler data. Most measured short-period signals must therefore have a different origin. The statistics of {\it long-period} TTVs -- likely arising from the gravitational interaction between planets -- indicates that single transiting planets have TTV-inducing companions nearly as often as doubles, thus ruling out multiplicity distributions with a prevalence of intrinsic singles. The fraction of planets with measured long-period TTVs increases to $\simeq 15$-18\% for observed multiplicities $m \geq 3$, suggesting a change in the orbital architecture. High-multiplicity planetary systems have low gap complexities and probably retained a memory of their formation conditions. Ultimately, our work aims at developing a more informative feedback between observations and planet formation theories.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2026

The Cosmological Hart-Tipler Conjecture

Self-reproducing automata, so-called von Neumann machines, have been repeatedly estimated to be capable of traversing the Galaxy many times given its age. Our mere existence thus seems to exclude an aggressive variant of such a probe having ever been launched in the Milky Way. The Hart-Tipler conjecture considers this to represent contra-positive evidence to the hypothesis that other extra-terrestrial technological entities have emerged in our galaxy. Recently, several authors have extended interstellar colonization calculations to cosmological volumes, but these models are loaded with specific assumptions about behavior and emergence times. Here, we present a bare-bones model of generic artificial infections (such as but not limited to von Neumann probes) at cosmological scale in order to maximize interpretability, an approach closer to the original spirit of the Hart-Tipler calculations. Our model has just three parameters, a spontaneous spawn rate, a propagation speed (u) and a start time for the calculation. Accounting for cosmological expansion, we find that half the Universe is infected by today for u=0.1c propagation starting 4.5 Gyr after the Big Bang if the spawn rate exceeds approximately once per million galaxies. For near-c propagation, this becomes a billion galaxies. Over 99.9% of cosmological volumes are filled with 0.1c if even 1-in-100,000 galaxies have ever spawned an infection. The "cosmological Hart-Tipler" problem therefore offers a remarkably sharp minimal-model constraint on the prevalence of aggressive, self-propagating technological behavior. We explore its implications, such as how anthropic reasoning implies such infections occur and its fine-tuning nature.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

The Catastrophic Consequences of Agnosticism for Life Searches and a Possible Workaround

Planned and ongoing searches for life, both biological and technological, confront an epistemic barrier concerning false positives - namely, that we don't know what we don't know. The most defensible and agnostic approach is to adopt diffuse (uninformative) priors, not only for the prevalence of life, but also for the prevalence of confounders. We evaluate the resulting Bayes factors between the null and life hypotheses for an idealized experiment with $N_{pos}$ positive labels (biosignature detections) among $N_{tot}$ targets with various priors. Using diffuse priors, the consequences are catastrophic for life detection, requiring at least ${\sim}10^4$ (for some priors ${\sim}10^{13}$) surveyed targets to ever obtain "strong evidence" for life. Accordingly, an HWO-scale survey with $N_{tot}{\sim}25$ would have no prospect of achieving this goal. A previously suggested workaround is to forgo the agnostic confounder prior, by asserting some upper limit on it for example, but we find that the results can be highly sensitive to this choice - as well as difficult to justify. Instead, we suggest a novel solution that retains agnosticism: by dividing the sample into two groups for which the prevalence of life differs, but the confounder rate is global. We show that a $N_{tot}=24$ survey could expect 24% of possible outcomes to produce strong life detections with this strategy, rising to $\geq50$% for $N_{tot}\geq76$. However, AB-testing introduces its own unique challenges to survey design, requiring two groups with differing life prevalence rates (ideally greatly so) but a global confounder rate.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2026

TIC-65910228 b / NGTS-38 b, a 180 day transiting warm super-Jupiter

We present the discovery of TIC-65910228 b / NGTS-38 b, a giant exoplanet with a radius of $1.081\pm0.047$ R$_\text{J}$ and a mass of $4.78_{-0.37}^{+0.39}$ M$_\text{J}$ on a long-period ($180.52797\pm0.00036$ day), moderately eccentric ($e=0.3086\pm0.010$) orbit transiting a bright (V=$10.230\pm0.020$ mag) metal rich ([Fe/H]=$0.33\pm0.09$, 'dex') F6V-F7V type host star. The planet was initially detected from a single transit in TESS Sector 33. A photometric monitoring campaign of 228 nights with NGTS detected a transit egress of the planet, which together with spectroscopic radial velocity monitoring with CORALIE and HARPS identified an orbital period of ~180.5,d. These radial velocity measurements also showed the mass of the companion to be planetary. Additional transit observations coordinated by the TESS follow-up observing program allowed further confirmation and refinement of this period. With its relatively cool equilibrium temperature of $457\pm11$ K, NGTS-38 b joins a small but growing population of well characterised transiting warm-Jupiters and has one of the longest periods of any discovered to date. The target is situated in the LOPS2 field of the upcoming PLATO mission which will allow for greater refinement of the system parameters and potential for the discovery of additional companions too small and/or too long-period to be seen by TESS or NGTS. NGTS-38 b's bright host star and wide orbital separation make it an attractive target for further study, including potential measurement of its spin-orbit alignment or targeted exomoon/ring searches.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2026

What to make of the Earth's curiously intermediate land fraction?

Approximately two-thirds of the Earth, the only known inhabited planet, is covered in ocean. Why not 0.01% or 99.99%? It has been previously suggested that this may represent a certain degree of fine-tuning, and thus perhaps observers are a-priori more likely to develop on those rare worlds with nearly equal land-ocean ratios, such as our own. In this work, we take the single datum of the Earth and then use Bayesian inference to compare four models for the probability distribution of a planet becoming inhabited by observers as a function of land-fraction, $f$, which we classify as i) land-centric ii) ocean-centric iii) equi-centric and iv) indifference. We find that no model is strongly favoured over the others, but that 1) the land-centric model is disfavoured over all others, and, 2) the equi-centric model is favoured over all competitors. Further, we show that more extreme models with heavy tail-weighting are strongly disfavoured even when conditioned upon the Earth alone. For example, a land-centric model where the median planet has $f=0.82$ (or greater) is in strong tension with our existence. Finally, we consider the potential addition of more data via Mars or exoplanets. Should paleo-Mars have once harboured life and had $f<0.20$, then this would strongly favour the ocean-centric model for life, over a land-centric hypothesis. We show that strong evidence for/against the equi-centric model versus its competitors would likely require at least a dozen inhabited exoplanets, offering a well-motivated sample size for future experiments.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2025

The Eschatian Hypothesis

The history of astronomical discovery shows that many of the most detectable phenomena, especially detection firsts, are not typical members of their broader class, but rather rare, extreme cases with disproportionately large observational signatures. Motivated by this, we propose the Eschatian Hypothesis: that the first confirmed detection of an extraterrestrial technological civilization is most likely to be an atypical example, one that is unusually "loud" (i.e., producing an anomalously strong technosignature), and plausibly in a transitory, unstable, or even terminal phase. Using a toy model, we derive conditions under which such loud civilizations dominate detections, finding for example that if a society is loud for only $10^{-6}$ of its lifetime, it must emit ${\gtrsim}1$% of its total observable energy budget during that phase to outrun quieter populations. The hypothesis naturally motivates agnostic anomaly searches in wide-field, multi-channel, continuous surveys as a practical strategy for a first detection of extraterrestrial technology.

physics.pop-ph↗

arXiv2025

A JWST Transit of a Jupiter Analog: II. A Search for Exomoons

We present a search for exomoons around the Jupiter-like exoplanet Kepler-167e using a NIRSpec JWST transit. Our 60 hour time series clearly reveals the enormous impact of long-term trends in NIRSpec data, specifically a gradual flux drift occurring over each of six 10 hour exposures. We weighed the evidence for exomoons by comparing a planet-only model with a planet+moon model for a grid of twelve different analysis choices. Our grid was comprised of three different reduction pipelines and four different models for the exposure-long trends - two using linear models and two using Gaussian processes. Seven grid realizations indicate a strong exomoon detection, typically favoring a Roche-skimming orbit roughly 10% the size of the planet. We find that the only likely real astrophysical feature driving these fits is a syzygy-like event occurring almost exactly mid-transit, which is highly ambiguous with a spot-crossing event. Indeed, we show that a spot of the necessary size is compatible with the earlier Kepler data. Ironically, the fact that JWST is so superior to Kepler means that our fits are effectively driven by a single transit - a regime in which exomoons have enormous freedom to explain non-Gaussian behavior. We thus strongly urge the next transit be observed in October 2027 to break these degeneracies. Our pilot study to seek transiting exomoons with JWST reveals the profound impact exposure-long trends exert - a cautionary tale for future analyzes of this data - as well as the need for a deeper understanding of this systematic's cause and modeling best-practices.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2025

A JWST Transit of a Jupiter Analog I: Constraints on the Oblateness of Kepler-167e

In October 2024 JWST observed a transit of Kepler-167e, a Jupiter-analog planet on a 1000+ day orbit. These observations, recorded over a long baseline of nearly 60 hours, were designed to search for signatures of planetary oblateness and/or exomoons comparable to Ganymede. In this first in a series of studies analyzing these data we report on constraints on Kepler-167e's oblateness. We explored a large grid of data reduction pipelines and modeling choices, including a new entirely independent reduction pipeline ("katahdin") and two new treatments for limb darkening. We find that under a Bayesian model comparison framework the data are fit equally well by both spherical and oblate planet models, and that our ability to constrain the oblateness is negatively impacted by the influence of exposure-long trends. Using the most conservative of our posteriors, we place a 95% upper bound on the projected oblateness of $f<0.097$, which corresponds to a rotation period of $P\geq7.11$ hours if the planet's spin axis is aligned with the sky plane. We note, however, that the final bound depends on the choice of reduction pipeline and systematics model, and that our suite of end-to-end analyses produced bounds as low as $f<0.065$ at 95%. We conclude that leveraging JWST to make tighter constraints on planetary oblateness will require further investigation into mitigating exposure-long trends and correlated noise.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2025

Solar Hegemony: M-Dwarfs Are Unlikely to Host Observers Such as Ourselves

With no firm evidence for life beyond our solar system, inferences about the population observers such as ourselves rests upon the Earth as a single input, at least for now. Whilst the narrative of our home as a 'humdrum' system has become ingrained in the public psyche via Sagan, there are at least two striking facts about our existence which we know are certainly unusual. First, the stelliferous period spans ~10Tyr - yet here we are living in the first 0.1% of that volume. Second, over three-quarters of all stars are low-mass M-dwarfs, stars with no shortage of rocky habitable-zone planets - and yet, again, our existence defies this trend, previously dubbed the Red Sky Paradox. Two plausible resolutions are that a) stars below a certain mass, $M_{crit}$, do not produce observers, and, b) planets have a truncated temporal window for observers, $T_{win}$, negating the longevity advantage of M-dwarfs. We develop a Bayesian model that encompasses both datums and jointly explores the two resolutions covariantly. Our analysis reveals that 1) the hypothesis that these observations are mere luck is disfavored with an overwhelming Bayes factor of ~1600; 2) some truncation of low-mass stars is indispensable, lowering $T_{win}$ alone cannot well-explain the observations; and, 3) the most conservative limit on $M_{crit}$ occurs when fixing $T_{win}=10$Gyr, yielding $M_{crit}>0.34 M_{\odot}$ [$0.74 M_{\odot}$] to 2$\sigma$ [1$\sigma$]. Our work challenges the tacit assumption of M-dwarfs being viable seats for observers and, indirectly, even life.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2025

Arecibo Wow! II: Revised Properties of the Wow! Signal from Archival Ohio SETI Data

The Wow! Signal, detected in 1977 by the Ohio State University SETI project, remains one of the most intriguing unexplained radio transients. The most recent significant revision of its properties took place in the late 1990s; however, further advances were limited by readily available data from this event. Here we retrieved and analyzed decades of previously unpublished Ohio SETI observations, enabling the most comprehensive re-evaluation of the properties of the Wow! Signal to date with modern methods. Our results reveal significant revisions to its parameters that may help explain why its source has been so difficult to identify. We refine its potential origin to two adjacent fields centered on the right ascension $\alpha=19^{\mathrm h}25^{\mathrm m}02^{\mathrm s} \pm 3^{\mathrm s}$ or $19^{\mathrm h}27^{\mathrm m}55^{\mathrm s} \pm 3^{\mathrm s}$, and the declination $\delta=-26^{\deg}57' \pm 20'$ (J2000), a location both narrower and slightly displaced from earlier estimates. We measure a higher peak flux density exceeding 250 Jy and a frequency of $1420.726 \pm 0.005$ MHz, implying a galactic source with a substantially higher radial velocity than previously assumed. Our analysis provides additional support for the hypothesis that the Wow! Signal most likely had an astrophysical origin rather than being attributed to radio interference. In particular, we confirm that small, cold HI clouds can produce narrowband signals similar to its detection, which might suggest a common origin. These findings provide the most precise constraints to date on the location, intensity, and frequency of the Wow! Signal and offer a new path to identify its origin.

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2025

Torqued Accelerator using Radiation from the Sun (TARS) for Interstellar Payloads

The concept of exploring space using solar power is energetically appealing, but interstellar solar sails typically require extremely low areal densities (~g/m^2). This work explores an alternative approach: storing solar energy as rotational kinetic energy, which is later released to propel a microprobe beyond the solar system. The proposed Torqued Accelerator using Radiation from the Sun (TARS) consists of two thin surfaces with contrasting albedos that gradually spins up over weeks to months while in a sub-Keplerian "quasite" orbit around the Sun. Though constrained by material strengths, careful design allows a phone-sized payload to reach interstellar velocities in less than a year, using commercially available materials (e.g. CNT sheets). The entire system spans tens of meters and weighs of order of a kilogram. Whilst there is no theoretical limit to the achievable speeds, practical designs grow exponentially in size as velocity targets increase, making interstellar flight feasible but relativistic speeds implausible. Several strategies, including the use of graphene sheets, gravity assists, the Oberth effect, and electrostatic confinement, could further maximise velocity. TARS is an attractive light sail technology when high-powered directed energy systems are impractical, offering a potentially low-cost solution for deploying small, sub-relativistic interstellar probes.

physics.space-ph↗

arXiv2025

Exoplaneteers Keep Overestimating Sigma Significances

Astronomers, and in particular exoplaneteers, have a curious habit of expressing Bayes factors as frequentist sigma values. This is of course completely unnecessary and arguably rather ill-advised. Regardless, the practice is common - especially in the detection claims of chemical species within exoplanet atmospheres. The current canonical conversion strategy stems from a statistics paper from Sellke et al. (2001), who derived an upper bound on the Bayes factor between the test and null hypotheses, as a function of the $p$-value (or number of sigmas, $n_{\sigma}$). A common practice within the exoplanet atmosphere community is to numerically invert this formula, going from a Bayes factor to $n_\sigma$. This goes back to Benneke & Seager (2013) -- a highly cited paper that introduced Bayesian model comparison as a means of inferring the presence of specific chemical species -- in an attempt to calibrate the Bayes factors from their technique for a community that in 2013 was more familiar with frequentist sigma significances. However, as originally noted by Sellke et al. (2001), the conversion only provides an upper limit on $n_\sigma$, with the true value generally being lower. This can result in inflations of claimed detection significances, and this note strongly urges the community to stop converting to $n_\sigma$ at all and simply stick with Bayes factors.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2025

Exoplaneteers Keep Calling Plots "Allan Variance" Plots When They Aren't

I highlight that there is a substantial number of papers (at least 11 published since 2024) which all refer to a specific type of plot as an "Allan variance" plot, when in fact they seem to be plotting the standard deviation of the residuals versus bin size. The Allan variance quantifies the stability of a time series by calculating the average squared difference between successive time-averaged segments over a specified interval; it is not equivalent to the standard deviation. This misattribution seems particularly prolific in the exoplanet transit spectroscopy community. However, I emphasize that it does not impact the scientific analyses presented in those works. I discuss where this confusion seems to stem from and encourage the community to ensure statistical measures are named correctly to avoid confusion.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2025

Strong Evidence That Abiogenesis Is a Rapid Process on Earth Analogs

The early start to life naively suggests that abiogenesis is a rapid process on Earth-like planets. However, if evolution typically takes ~4Gyr to produce intelligent life-forms like us, then the limited lifespan of Earth's biosphere (~5-6Gyr) necessitates an early (and possibly highly atypical) start to our emergence - an example of the weak anthropic principle. Our previously proposed objective Bayesian analysis of Earth's chronology culminated in a formula for the minimum odds ratio between the fast and slow abiogenesis scenarios (relative to Earth's lifespan). Timing from microfossils (3.7Gya) yields 3:1 odds in favor of rapid abiogenesis, whereas evidence from carbon isotopes (4.1Gya) gives 9:1, both below the canonical threshold of "strong evidence" (10:1). However, the recent result of a 4.2Gya LUCA pushes the odds over the threshold for the first time (nominally 13:1). In fact, the odds ratio is >10:1 for all possible values of the biosphere's ultimate lifespan and speculative hypotheses of ancient civilizations. For the first time, we have formally strong evidence that favors the hypothesis that life rapidly emerges in Earth-like conditions (although such environments may themselves be rare).

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2025

Near-circular orbits for planets around M/K-type stars with Earth-like sizes and instellations

Recent advances have enabled the discovery of a population of potentially Earth-like planets, yet their orbital eccentricity, which governs their climate and provides clues about their origin and dynamical history, is still largely unconstrained. We identify a sample of 17 transiting exoplanets around late-type stars with similar radii and irradiation to that of Earth and use the "photoeccentric effect" - which exploits transit durations - to infer their eccentricity distribution via hierarchical Bayesian modelling. Our analysis establishes that these worlds further resemble Earth in that their eccentricities are nearly circular (mean eccentricity $=0.060_{-0.028}^{+0.040}$ and $\leq0.15$), with the exception of one outlier of moderate eccentricity. The results hint at a subset population of dynamically warmer Earths, but this requires a larger sample to statistically confirm. The planets in our sample are thus largely subject to minimal eccentricity-induced seasonal variability and are consistent with emerging via smooth disk migration rather than violent planet-planet scattering.

astro-ph.EP↗

arXiv2024

Mapping the Orbital Landscape of Perturbing Planet Solutions for Single-Planet Systems with TTVs

There are now thousands of single-planet systems observed to exhibit transit timing variations (TTVs), yet we largely lack any interpretation of the implied masses responsible for these perturbations. Even when assuming these TTVs are driven by perturbing planets, the solution space is notoriously multi-modal with respect to the perturber's orbital period and there exists no standardized procedure to pinpoint these modes, besides from blind brute force numerical efforts. Using $N$-body simulations with TTVFast and focusing on the dominant periodic signal in the TTVs, we chart out the landscape of these modes and provide analytic predictions for their locations and widths, providing the community with a map for the first time: the TTV circus tent diagram. We then introduce an approach for modeling single-planet TTVs in the low-eccentricity regime, by splitting the orbital period space into a number of uniform prior bins over which there aren't these degeneracies. We show how one can define appropriate orbital period priors for the perturbing planet in order to sufficiently sample the complete parameter space. We demonstrate, analytically, how one can explain the numerical simulations using first-order near mean-motion resonance super-periods, the synodic period, and their aliases -- the expected dominant TTV periods in the low-eccentricity regime. Using a Bayesian framework, we then present a method for determining the optimal solution between TTVs induced by a perturbing planet and TTVs induced by a moon.

astro-ph.EP↗