arXiv subjects

David Fagnan

Publications and source records attributed to David Fagnan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Safety as a Constraint: Fine-Tuning a LLM Recommender to Explain Itself

Traditional recommender systems are typically trained to predict what item users will interact with next, but not why. However, offering personalized evidence for why a user might like the predicted item is an important way to enhance the service and to raise the likelihood that the user will be genuinely interested in the recommendation. This service can be delivered by integrating a frontier-model call into the member-facing pipeline, but it will add extra cost and latency. In this paper, we train a recommender LLM to generate personalized explanations for its reccomendation, based on the user's watching history at a large video streaming service. We impose two requirements on the generated explanation: it must be faithful to the elements of the shows it links, and it must be strictly non-harmful to the user. To this end, we first train two LLM-judge reward models covering three specific criteria, and propose constrained GRPO to incorporate these different criteria. On a held-out real-world testing set, our fine-tuned model improves the all-three-criteria PASS rate rises from 0.649 to 0.956 under our own judges and from 0.677 to 0.931 under an independent judge, where as the frontier generator performs similar to the untuned recommender baseline. We conduct further experiments to show that the model's language and recommendation abilities remain unchanged. Based on these results, we conclude that an LLM-based recommender can be fine-tuned on other complex tasks without compromising its original recommendation performance, thus provide insights for further agentic user interface powered by a single model.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations

LLM-as-a-Judge, which leverages a large language model to evaluate natural language generated by another AI application or model, has become a standard, scalable approach for accelerating and extending costly human evaluation. Yet most work treats a judge as a static artifact, evaluating it once at construction or against a fixed benchmark. We argue instead that an LLM judge operating in a deployed system is better understood as having a lifecycle. It must be built, trained, deployed, and continuously maintained as the surrounding data evolves, and each phase poses distinct technical and operational challenges. We present such a lifecycle for the LLM judges that evaluate recommendation explanations at Netflix. Everything we report comes out of a series of controlled online member-facing experiments, in which our pipeline generated and the judges assessed hundreds of thousands of distinct show-level explanations per week across a changing catalog. Our framework has four phases. (I) Birth defines the evaluation criteria and builds curated benchmark datasets with human labels and rationales. (II) Training refines the judges' rubrics via Reasoning-Aligned Rubric Tuning (RART), which uses a meta-judge over reasoning output as the learning signal. (III) Deployment puts one judge in two online roles, quality gating and reflective generation. (IV) Monitoring runs a continuous Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) alignment process that detects drift and triggers re-tuning behind a human review gate. We report results from a five-week online A/B test over tens of millions of members on the Netflix mobile app, in which judge-aligned explanations shifted member viewing toward novel content (previously unwatched) and increased successful browse-to-play sessions relative to a no-explanation control, with no quality-related escalations.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Multimedia Asset Personalization via Multimodal Embeddings at Netflix

Personalized promotional assets, namely artwork images and video preview clips, are critical to content discovery on Netflix. Traditional models for asset selection rely on ID-based interaction history, leaving them blind to asset content and unable to serve newly launched titles and assets. We describe how multimodal embeddings reshaped production systems at Netflix and report transferable lessons for practitioners adopting foundation-model embeddings into recommender systems. First, pretrained image embeddings unlock cross-title, cross-canvas knowledge transfer. Augmenting a two-tower model with CLIP image embeddings lets a single model serve all five Netflix artwork canvas types, replacing five separately trained per-canvas models and substantially improving cold-start performance. A lightweight extension reuses CLIP's joint text-image space to make artwork personalization query-aware in search. Second, multimodality decisively beats any single modality for video preview personalization. We describe MediaFM, our in-house tri-modal foundation model trained on a large-scale corpus of shots from the Netflix show catalog, fusing visual (SeqCLIP), audio (wav2vec 2.0), and timed-text signals; adopted for video preview personalization, it outperforms strong visual-only baselines both offline and in online A/B tests. Third, a simple offline proxy task whose performance correlates with online outcomes can accelerate the experimentation and productization cycle. Predicting the popularity-based winner from embeddings alone ranks embedding models and versions, pruning the choice space before any end-to-end integration or A/B test; it now gates every new MediaFM checkpoint. We also share the production engineering decisions (shared embedding infrastructure, low-latency serving, cheap screening) that made these deployments viable, along with the design tradeoffs and failure modes we encountered.

cs.IR↗