arXiv subjects

Daniel Soliman

Publications and source records attributed to Daniel Soliman.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Acquisition state behaves as a structured, measurable variable governing lung-nodule AI: kernel-driven measurement instability and noise-driven detection fragility, invisible to DICOM metadata

AI governance for medical imaging is formalizing: the 2026 ACR-SIIM Practice Parameter recommends local acceptance testing and ongoing drift monitoring, and the ACR Assess-AI registry monitors AI outputs using DICOM metadata for context. We argue that a necessary, currently unmonitored layer sits beneath output metrics: whether incoming studies remain within the acquisition envelope a model was validated on. Using a LUNA16-trained MONAI RetinaNet lung-nodule detector, we test whether acquisition state behaves as a structured, measurable variable. On real paired CT differing only in reconstruction kernel (NLST B30f vs B80f), kernel alone shifted AI-measured diameter and flipped a Fleischner size category in 5.2% (8 of 155) of nodules at fixed patient and acquisition, while detection confidence was unchanged (Wilcoxon p=0.22). Under controlled LIDC-IDRI perturbations the effects dissociated by axis: the noise axis degraded detection confidence (p=5.9e-32, concentrated in nodules under 6 mm) but not measurement, while the frequency/kernel axis corrupted measurement (p=8.6e-13) but not detection. A 4-feature pixel fingerprint recovered reconstruction identity (patient-level AUC about 0.95 on real CT, 0.995 on a QIBA phantom) where the ConvolutionKernel DICOM tag was uninformative (identical labels across reconstructions). The kernel axis transported across four manufacturers (leave-one-vendor-out AUC 0.94-0.98, matching the within-vendor ceiling). Acquisition state thus maps to distinct AI failure modes, frequency content to measurement reliability and noise to detection sensitivity, and is not recoverable from metadata. Acquisition-aware, input-side validation is the missing layer for the acceptance-testing and drift-monitoring requirements now entering imaging-AI accreditation.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2026

Beyond Benchmarks: A Framework for Post Deployment Validation of CT Lung Nodule Detection AI

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) assisted lung nodule detection systems are increasingly deployed in clinical settings without site-specific validation. Performance reported under benchmark conditions may not reflect real-world behavior when acquisition parameters differ from training data. Purpose: To propose and demonstrate a physics-guided framework for evaluating the sensitivity of a deployed lung nodule detection model to systematic variation in CT acquisition parameters. Methods: Twenty-one cases from the publicly available LIDC-IDRI dataset were evaluated using a MONAI RetinaNet model pretrained on LUNA16 (fold 0, no fine-tuning). Five imaging conditions were tested: baseline, 25% dose reduction, 50% dose reduction, 3 mm slice thickness, and 5 mm slice thickness. Dose reduction was simulated via image-domain Gaussian noise; slice thickness via moving average along the z-axis. Detection sensitivity was computed at a confidence threshold of 0.5 with a 15 mm matching criterion. Results: Baseline sensitivity was 45.2% (57/126 consensus nodules). Dose reduction produced slight degradation: 41.3% at 25% dose and 42.1% at 50% dose. The 5 mm slice thickness condition produced a marked drop to 26.2% - a 19 percentage point reduction representing a 42% relative decrease from baseline. This finding was consistent across confidence thresholds from 0.1 to 0.9. Per-case analysis revealed heterogeneous performance including two cases with complete detection failure at baseline. Conclusion: Slice thickness represents a more fundamental constraint on AI detection performance than image noise under the conditions tested. The proposed framework is reproducible, requires no proprietary scanner data, and is designed to serve as the basis for ongoing post-deployment QA in resource-constrained environment.

eess.IV↗

arXiv2025

Impact IRR: Leveraging Modern Portfolio Theory to Define Impact Investments

The impact investment market has an estimated value of almost $1.6 trillion. Significant progress has been made in determining the financial returns of impact investing. Investors are still, however, in the early stages of determining impact return. In this study, the author proposes the use of impact internal rate of return (impact IRR) to evaluate and monitor impact investments. This approach, which utilizes components of modern portfolio theory, adapted financial tools, and existing datasets, is demonstrated herein through initial use cases and examples showing how it can be employed to optimize impact.

q-fin.GN↗