arXiv ScienceSearch

arXiv subjects

Collin Raymond

Publications and source records attributed to Collin Raymond.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Agreement and Diversity in Interpretation

We study joint decision-making when agents agree on all primitives other than signal likelihoods. We propose a decision-theoretic measure of interpretive disagreement: a pair of subjective models is more agreeable than another if, uniformly across decision problems, it supports a larger set of signal-contingent plans that both agents weakly prefer ex-ante to the common reservation payoff. We show that this measure is prior independent and can be represented as an inclusion preorder over pairs of subjective models: each model in the more agreeable pair is a convex combination of the two models in the less agreeable pair. We then show that the measure's unique rotation-invariant scalar completion is cosine similarity. Applications show that greater agreement reduces speculative-trade wedges, expands a normalized version of the ex-ante Pareto frontier, and enlarges the set of single-model rationalizations. Our order is independent of Blackwell dominance and selects quadratic over KL-type Bregman divergences.

econ.TH

Measuring Choice Difficulty

We provide a theoretical framework to understand how widely used measures of choice difficulty relate. In a binary-option Bayesian expected-utility framework, we show that three measures of difficulty, (i) understanding (ex-ante value), (ii) choice randomness, and (iii) confidence that the chosen option is ex post correct, are, in general, unrelated, and that this result extends to other potential measures like attenuation. We provide intuitive sufficient conditions which align the orders, using both restrictions on Blackwell experiments that capture well known classes (such as logit) and restrictions on payoffs and demonstrate that in psychophysical tasks that pay only for correctness, confidence coincides with understanding. We show willingness-to-accept to switch, when measured in utils, is equivalent to understanding. Our results suggest caution in interpreting measures of choice difficulty as well as the degree of portability between economics and psychophysics experiments

econ.TH

Risk and Monotone Comparative Statics without Independence

We extend well-known comparative results under expected utility to models of non-expected utility by providing novel conditions on local utility functions. We illustrate how our results parallel, and are distinct from, existing results for monotone comparative statics under expected utility, as well as risk preferences for non-expected utility. Our conditions generalize existing results for specific preferences (including expected utility) and allow us to verify monotone comparative statics for novel environments and preferences. We apply our results to portfolio choice problems where preferences or wealth might change, as well as precautionary savings.

econ.TH

Coherent Distorted Beliefs

Many models of economics assume that individuals distort objective probabilities. We propose a simple consistency condition on distortion functions, which we term distortion coherence, that ensures that the function commutes with conditioning on an event. We show that distortion coherence restricts belief distortions to have a particular function form: power-weighted distortions, where distorted beliefs are proportional to the original beliefs raised to a power and weighted by a state-specific value. We generalize our findings to allow for distortions of the probabilities assigned to both states and signals, which nests the functional forms widely used in studying probabilistic biases (e.g., Grether, 1980 and Benjamin, 2019). We show how coherent distorted beliefs are tightly related to several extant models of motivated beliefs: they are the outcome of maximizing anticipated expected utility subject to a generalized Kullback-Liebler cost of distortion. Moreover, in the domain of lottery choice, we link coherent distortions to explanations of non-expected utility like the Allais paradox: individuals who maximize subjective expected utility maximizers conditional on coherent distorted beliefs are equivalent to the weighted utility maximizers studied by Chew [1983].

econ.TH