arXiv subjects

Colin Cleveland

Publications and source records attributed to Colin Cleveland.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Resolving Envy by Adding Goods with Bounded Supply: A Type-Count Dichotomy and Two-Agent Hardness

We study envy elimination by adding goods (EEAG) when the additional pool has bounded supply and no separate budget bound. We establish a sharp type-count dichotomy for binary additive valuations. With one additional item type, EEAG is polynomial-time solvable for any number of agents. More generally, our algorithm permits arbitrary nonnegative integer per-copy values. The envy constraints form a system of difference constraints, and Bellman--Ford returns the componentwise least feasible extension. In contrast, with exactly two additional item types, EEAG is \textsf{NP}-complete even when both types have positive finite supply and the approvers of one type form a subset of the approvers of the other. This closes the two-type case left open by Bentert et al. Separately, we prove weak \textsf{NP}-completeness even for two agents with identical additive valuations, one initially endowed good, and a growing number of unit-supply item types. Thus, bounded-supply hardness appears both with two item-types and many agents and with two agents and many item-types.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2026

The Complexity of Strategic Behavior in Primary Elections

We study the computational complexity of strategic behaviour in primary elections. Unlike direct voting systems, primaries introduce a multi-stage process in which voters first influence intra-party nominees before a general election determines the final winner. While previous work has evaluated primaries via welfare distortion, we instead examine their game-theoretic properties. We formalise a model of primaries under first-past-the-post with fixed tie-breaking and analyse voters' strategic behaviour. We show that determining whether a pure Nash equilibrium exists is $\Sigma_2^{\mathbf P}$-complete, computing a best response is NP-complete, and deciding the existence of subgame-perfect equilibria in sequential primaries is PSPACE-complete. These results reveal that primaries fundamentally increase the computational difficulty of strategic reasoning, situating them as a rich source of complexity-theoretic challenges within computational social choice.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Optimal Candidate Positioning in Multi-Issue Elections

We study strategic candidate positioning in multidimensional spatial-voting elections. Voters and candidates are represented as points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, and each voter supports the candidate that is closest under a distance induced by an $\ell_p$-norm. We prove that computing an optimal location for a new candidate is NP-hard already against a single opponent, whereas for a constant number of issues the problem is tractable: an $O(n^{d+1})$ hyperplane-enumeration algorithm and an $O(n \log n)$ radial-sweep routine for $d=2$ solve the task exactly. We further derive the first approximation guarantees for the general multi-candidate case and show how our geometric approach extends seamlessly to positional-scoring rules such as $k$-approval and Borda. These results clarify the algorithmic landscape of multidimensional spatial elections and provide practically implementable tools for campaign strategy.

cs.GT↗

arXiv2025

Context-sensitive norm enforcement reduces sanctioning costs in spatial public goods games

Uniform punishment policies can sustain cooperation in social dilemmas but impose severe costs on enforcers, creating a second-order free-rider problem that undermines the very mechanism designed to prevent exploitation. We show that the remedy is not a harsher stick but a smarter one. In a four-strategy spatial public-goods game we pit conventional punishers, who levy a fixed fine, against norm-responsive punishers that double both fine and cost only when at least half of their current group already cooperates. Extensive large scale Monte Carlo simulations on lattices demonstrate that context-sensitive punishment achieves complete defector elimination at fine levels 15\% lower than uniform enforcement, despite identical marginal costs per sanctioning event. The efficiency gain emerges because norm-responsive punishers conserve resources in defector-dominated regions while concentrating intensified sanctions at cooperative-defector boundaries, creating self-reinforcing fronts that amplify the spread of prosocial behavior. These findings reveal that enforcement efficiency can be dramatically improved by targeting punishment at cooperative-defector interfaces rather than applying uniform sanctions, offering quantitative guidelines for designing adaptive regulatory mechanisms that maximize compliance while minimizing institutional costs.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2024

Suppressing defection by increasing temptation: the impact of smart cooperators on a social dilemma situation

In a social dilemma situation, where individual and collective interests are in conflict, it sounds a reasonable assumption that the presence of super or smart players, who simultaneously punish defection and reward cooperation without allowing exploitation, could solve the basic problem. The behavior of such a multi-strategy system, however, is more subtle than it is firstly anticipated. When exploring the complete parameter space, we find that the emergence of cyclic dominance among strategies is rather common, which results in several counter-intuitive phenomena. For example, the defection level can be lowered at higher temptation, or weaker punishment provides better conditions for smart players. Our study indicates that smart cooperators can unexpectedly thrive under high temptation, emphasizing the complexity of strategic interactions. This study suggests that the principles governing these interactions can be applied to other moral behaviors, such as truth-telling and honesty, providing valuable insights for future research in multi-agent systems.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2023

Supporting punishment via taxation in a structured population

Taxes are an essential and uniformly applied institution for maintaining modern societies. However, the levels of taxation remain an intensive debate topic among citizens. If each citizen contributes to common goals, a minimal tax would be sufficient to cover common expenses. However, this is only achievable at high cooperation level; hence, a larger tax bracket is required. A recent study demonstrated that if an appropriate tax partially covers the punishment of defectors, cooperation can be maintained above a critical level of the multiplication factor, characterizing the synergistic effect of common ventures. Motivated by real-life experiences, we revisited this model by assuming an interactive structure among competitors. All other model elements, including the key parameters characterizing the cost of punishment, fines, and tax level, remain unchanged. The aim was to determine how the spatiality of a population influences the competition of strategies when punishment is partly based on a uniform tax paid by all participants. This extension results in a more subtle system behavior in which different ways of coexistence can be observed, including dynamic pattern formation owing to cyclic dominance among competing strategies.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2023

Restoring spatial cooperation with myopic agents in a three-strategy social dilemma

Introducing strategy complexity into the basic conflict of cooperation and defection is a natural response to avoid the tragedy of the common state. As an intermediate approach, quasi-cooperators were recently suggested to address the original problem. In this study, we test its vitality in structured populations where players have fixed partners. Naively, the latter condition should support cooperation unambiguously via enhanced network reciprocity. However, the opposite is true because the spatial structure may provide a humbler cooperation level than a well-mixed population. This unexpected behavior can be understood if we consider that at a certain parameter interval the original prisoner's dilemma game is transformed into a snow-drift game. If we replace the original imitating strategy protocol by assuming myopic players, the spatial population becomes a friendly environment for cooperation. This observation is valid in a huge region of parameter space. This study highlights that spatial structure can reveal a new aspect of social dilemmas when strategy complexity is introduced.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2023

Graphlet and Orbit Computation on Heterogeneous Graphs

Many applications, ranging from natural to social sciences, rely on graphlet analysis for the intuitive and meaningful characterization of networks employing micro-level structures as building blocks. However, it has not been thoroughly explored in heterogeneous graphs, which comprise various types of nodes and edges. Finding graphlets and orbits for heterogeneous graphs is difficult because of the heterogeneity and abundance of semantic information. We consider heterogeneous graphs, which can be treated as colored graphs. By applying the canonical label technique, we determine the graph isomorphism problem with multiple states on nodes and edges. With minimal parameters, we build all non-isomorphic graphs and associated orbits. We provide a Python package that can be used to generate orbits for colored directed graphs and determine the frequency of orbit occurrence. Finally, we provide four examples to illustrate the use of the Python package.

cs.SI↗

arXiv2022

Group-size dependent synergy in heterogeneous populations

When people collaborate, they expect more in return than a simple sum of their efforts. This observation is at the heart of the so-called public goods game, where the participants' contributions are multiplied by an $r$ synergy factor before they are distributed among group members. However, a larger group could be more effective, which can be described by a larger synergy factor. To elaborate on the possible consequences, in this study, we introduce a model where the population has different sizes of groups, and the applied synergy factor depends on the size of the group. We examine different options when the increment of $r$ is linear, slow, or sudden, but in all cases, the cooperation level is higher than that in a population where the homogeneous $r$ factor is used. In the latter case, smaller groups perform better; however, this behavior is reversed when synergy increases for larger groups. Hence, the entire community benefits because larger groups are rewarded better. Notably, a similar qualitative behavior can be observed for other heterogeneous topologies, including scale-free interaction graphs.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2022

When costly migration helps to improve cooperation

Motion is a typical reaction among animals and humans trying to reach better conditions in a changing world. This aspect has been studied intensively in social dilemmas where competing players' individual and collective interests are in conflict. Starting from the traditional public goods game model, where players are locally fixed and unconditional cooperators or defectors are present, we introduce two additional strategies through which agents can change their positions of dependence on the local cooperation level. More importantly, these so-called sophisticated players should bear an extra cost to maintain their permanent capacity to evaluate their neighborhood and react accordingly. Hence, four strategies compete, and the most successful one can be imitated by its neighbors. Crucially, the introduction of costly movement has a highly biased consequence on the competing main strategies. In the majority of parameter space, it is harmful to defectors and provides a significantly higher cooperation level when the population is rare. At an intermediate population density, which would be otherwise optimal for a system of immobile players, the presence of mobile actors could be detrimental if the interaction pattern changes slightly, thereby blocking the optimal percolation of information flow. In this parameter space, sophisticated cooperators can also show the co-called Moor effect by first avoiding the harmful vicinity of defectors; they subsequentially transform into an immobile cooperator state. Hence, paradoxically, the additional cost of movement could be advantageous to reach a higher general income, especially for a rare population when subgroups would be isolated otherwise.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2021

Mercenary punishment in structured populations

Punishing those who refuse to participate in common efforts is a known and intensively studied way to maintain cooperation among self-interested agents. But this act is costly, hence punishers who are generally also engaged in the original joint venture, become vulnerable, which jeopardizes the effectiveness of this incentive. As an alternative, we may hire special players, whose only duty is to watch the population and punish defectors. Such a policelike or mercenary punishment can be maintained by a tax-based fund. If this tax is negligible, a cyclic dominance may emerge among different strategies. When this tax is relevant then this solution disappears. In the latter case, the fine level becomes a significant factor that determines whether punisher players coexist with cooperators or alternatively with defectors. The maximal average outcome can be reached at an intermediate cost value of punishment. Our observations highlight that we should take special care when such kind of punishment and accompanying tax are introduced to reach a collective goal.

physics.soc-ph↗

arXiv2021

Small Fraction of Selective Cooperators Can Elevate General Wellbeing Significantly

A cooperative player invests effort into a common venture without knowing the partner's intention in advance. But this strategy can be implemented in various ways when a player is involved in different games simultaneously. Interestingly, if cooperative players distinguish their neighbors and allocate all their external investments into the most successful partner's game exclusively then a significant cooperation level can be reached even at harsh circumstances where game parameters would dictate full defection otherwise. This positive impact, however, can also be reached when just a smaller fraction of players apply this sophisticated investment protocol during the game. To confirm this hypothesis we have checked several distributions that determine the fraction of supporting players who apply the mentioned selective investment protocol. Notably, when these players are not isolated, but their influences percolate then the whole population may enjoy the benefit of full cooperation already at a relatively low value of the synergy factor which represents the dilemma strength in the applied public goods game.

physics.soc-ph↗