arXiv subjects

Christopher S. Kochanek

Publications and source records attributed to Christopher S. Kochanek.

184 records · Page 11Linked to original sources

arXiv1996

Structural and dynamical uncertainties in modeling axisymmetric elliptical galaxies

Quantitative dynamical models of galaxies require deprojecting the observed surface brightness to determine the luminosity density of the galaxy. Existing deprojection methods for axisymmetric galaxies assume that a unique deprojection exists for any given inclination, even though the projected density is known to be degenerate to the addition of "konus densities" that are invisible in projection. We develop a deprojection method based on linear regularization that can explore the range of luminosity densities statistically consistent with an observed surface brightness distribution. The luminosity density is poorly constrained at modest inclinations (i > ~30 deg), even in the limit of vanishing observational errors. In constant mass-to-light ratio, axisymmetric, two-integral dynamical models, the uncertainties in the luminosity density result in large uncertainties in the meridional plane velocities. However, the projected line-of-sight velocities show variations comparable to current typical observational uncertainties.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1995

The Mass of the Milky Way Galaxy

We use the Jaffe model as a global mass distribution for the Galaxy and determine the circular velocity $v_c$ and the Jaffe radius $r_j$ using the satellites of the Galaxy, estimates of the local escape velocity of stars, the constraints imposed by the known rotation curve of the disk, and the Local Group timing model. The models include the systematic uncertainties in the isotropy of the satellite orbits, the form of the stellar distribution function near the escape velocity, and the ellipticity of the M31/Galaxy orbit. If we include the Local Group timing constraint, then Leo I is bound, $v_c=230\pm30\kms$, and $r_j=180$ kpc (110 kpc $\ltorder r_j \ltorder $ 300 kpc) at 90\% confidence. The satellite orbits are nearly isotropic with $β=1-σ_θ^2/σ_r^2=0.07$ ($-0.7 \ltorder β\ltorder 0.6$) and the stellar distribution function near the escape velocity is $f(ε)\propto ε^k$ with $k_r=3.7$ ($0.8 \ltorder k_r \ltorder 7.6$) where $k_r=k+5/2$. While not an accurate measurement of $k$, it is consistent with models of violent relaxation ($k=3/2$). The mass inside 50 kpc is $(5.4\pm1.3)\times 10^{11} M_\odot$. Higher mass models require that M31 is on its second orbit and that the halo is larger than the classical tidal limit of the binary. Such models must have a significant fraction of the Local Group mass in an extended Local Group halo. Lower mass models require that both M31 and Leo I are unbound, but there is no plausible mechanism to produce the observed deviations of M31 and Leo I from their expected velocities in an unbound system. If we do not use the Local Group timing model, the median mass of the Galaxy {\it increases} significantly, and the error bars broaden. Using only the satellite, escape velocity, and disk rotation curve constraints, the

astro-ph↗

arXiv1994

Gravitational Lensing Limits on Cold Dark Matter and Its Variants

Standard $Ω_0=1$ cold dark matter (CDM) needs $0.27 < σ_8 < 0.63$ ($2σ$) to fit the observed number of large separation lenses, and the constraint is nearly independent of $H_0=100h^{-1}\kms$ Mpc$^{-1}$. This range is strongly inconsistent with the COBE estimate of $σ_8=(2.8\pm0.2)h$. Tilting the primordial spectrum $\propto k^n$ from $n=1$ to $0.3 \ltorder n \ltorder 0.7$, using an effective Hubble constant of $0.15 \ltorder Γ=h \ltorder 0.30$, or reducing the matter density to $0.15 \ltorder Ω_0 h \ltorder 0.3$ either with no cosmological constant ($λ_0=0$) or in a flat universe with a cosmological constant ($Ω_0+λ_0=1$) can bring the lensing estimate of $σ_8$ into agreement with the COBE estimates. The models and values for $σ_8$ consistent with both lensing and COBE match the estimates from the local number density of clusters and correlation functions. The conclusions are insensitive to systematic errors except for the assumption that cluster core radii are singular. If clusters with $ρ\propto(r^2+s^2)^{-1}$ have core radii exceeding $s = 15h^{-1}σ_3^2$ kpc for a cluster with velocity dispersion $σ=10^3σ_3 \kms$ then the estimates are invalid. There is, however, a fine tuning problem in making the cluster core radii large enough to invalidate the estimates of $σ_8$ while producing several lenses that do not have central or ``odd images.'' The estimated completeness of the current samples of lenses larger than $5\parcs0$ is 20\%, because neither quasar surveys nor lens surveys are optimized to this class of lenses.

astro-ph↗

arXiv1993

Gravitational Waves and $γ$-Ray Bursts

Coalescing binaries in distant galaxies are one of the most promising sources of gravitational waves detectable by the LIGO project.$^{[1-5]}$ They are also a copious source of neutrinos,$^{[1]}$ however these neutrino pulses are far too weak to be detected on earth. Several years ago Eichler \etal$\,$$^{[6]}$ suggested that they are also sources of $γ$-ray bursts (GRBs). Recently it was found$^{[7]}$ that GRBs are likely to be cosmological in origin, and coalescing binary systems$^{[6,8-11]}$ are probably the most promising cosmological sources. The current estimates of the burst and LIGO rates from a cosmologically distributed population are based on the systems observed in our galaxy.$^{[12-14]}$ These estimates are based on only three binarys so there are large statistical uncertainties in the coalescence rate. If we accept the cosmological/coalescing binary hypothesis for GRBs, then we get a more accurate estimate of the rate at which binaries coalesce and hence of the predicted LIGO signal. The association between GRBs and binaries can significantly improve the performance of LIGO. The detection of gravitational radiation from a GRB source not only confirms the coalescing binary model, but it will also provide information on the geometry and energy generation mechanism of the burst.

astro-ph↗