arXiv subjects

Christian Feiler

Publications and source records attributed to Christian Feiler.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Do LLMs Know When They Are Wrong About Molecules? In-Context Property Prediction with Self-Reported Uncertainty

Large language models (LLMs) are used in many domains, but molecular property prediction with them is still little explored. In this work we evaluate the capability of 7 frontier LLMs to predict molecular properties together with a self-reported uncertainty from in-context examples, and compare them with classical baselines trained on the same molecules. We use 4 datasets and screen each for contamination of the training data of the LLMs: three are clean, and the fourth, ESOL, is memorised by most of the models and serves as a comparison. On the clean datasets every LLM improves with the context, at 30 examples the most accurate one beats every baseline. The requested reasoning effort changes accuracy little. The self-reported uncertainty ranks the prediction errors weakly, with Spearman rank correlations of up to 0.46, about the level reached by the uncertainties of the baselines. Combining uncertainty and prediction, on lipophilicity the most certain half of the best LLM is the most accurate at small context sizes; on BACE and antiviral, and on lipophilicity at large context sizes, the best LLMs are on par with the best baseline. On the contaminated ESOL dataset the LLMs show no improvement with the context size, as expected for a memorised dataset, and their stated uncertainty is smaller on the molecules whose value they recall.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

CTXAgent - Self-Controlled Context Management of LLM Agents

Agent harnesses keep long sessions inside the context window by compacting the history when a token threshold is crossed. We study an alternative in which the model manages its own context: it decides when to compact, what to keep and what to write as the hand-off, given two tools and one paragraph of guidance. Since earlier work found that open-weight models cannot manage their own context without scaffolding, we compare seven frontier models under identical conditions, with and without the context tools, on token cost and benchmark score, and we compare our harness with three widely used harnesses on two of these models. The benchmark is assembled from existing ones: coding exercises, multi-step SciCode problems and SWE-bench Pro and Terminal-Bench 4.0 tasks are interleaved with planted facts, ephemeral observations and standing instructions, all checked deterministically, in sessions of 35-212 turns that resemble a user working through different tasks in one chat. Most of the strongest models manage their context: they compact and curate regularly, the live context of the mixed sessions stays mostly below 100k tokens, and their benchmark scores mostly do not drop significantly. For the models that manage their context well, the cost reduction is substantial but varies between models, because some models compact so often that other costs increase. With Claude Opus 5.5, the self-managed harness matches Claude Code on task success at 34% lower cost than its explicit 200k-window configuration and 49% lower than its default, with no context window to choose. We release the agent, the benchmark and all result rows.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Molecular Déjà Vu: Digit-Level Retrieval of Molecular Properties in Frontier Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly employed to predict molecular properties. However, prediction error alone cannot distinguish prediction from retrieval of published values. We audit 22 frontier models on 12 molecular regression datasets in a zero-shot setting, assessed against a molecule-blind reference derived from each dataset's labels. Significant retrieval is concentrated on 5 datasets, with isolated flagged LLMs elsewhere. Increasing the reasoning setting raises the number of flagged model--dataset combinations from 47 to 89 of 264. An in-context blinding experiment reduces retrieval but leaves a quarter of the combinations flagged. Blinding changes model rankings and increases errors. Because blinding also removes chemically interpretable structure, the error increase can only be partially attributed to reduced retrieval.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

In-Context Molecular Property Prediction with LLMs: A Blinding Study on Memorization and Knowledge Conflicts

The capabilities of large language models (LLMs) have expanded beyond natural language processing to scientific prediction tasks, including molecular property prediction. However, their effectiveness in in-context learning remains ambiguous, particularly given the potential for training data contamination in widely used benchmarks. This paper investigates whether LLMs perform genuine in-context regression on molecular properties or instead rely on verbatim retrieval of memorized target values. Furthermore, we analyze the interplay between pre-trained knowledge and in-context information through a series of progressively blinded experiments. We evaluate nine LLM variants across three families (GPT-4.1, GPT-5, Gemini 2.5) on three MoleculeNet datasets (Delaney solubility, Lipophilicity, QM7 atomization energy) using a systematic blinding approach that iteratively reduces available information, complemented by 0-, 60-, and 1000-shot in-context sample sizes as an additional control for information access. To validate the memorization analysis and the blinding experiments, we add a positive and a negative control for the memorization experiments and structural reference baselines for the multi-shot experiments as well as bootstrap confidence intervals for all results. We find no evidence of verbatim retrieval on the legacy benchmarks and show that blinding exposes conflicts between pre-trained knowledge and in-context information. This work provides a principled framework for evaluating molecular property prediction under controlled information access.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2024

Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities When Inferring Requirements From Regulations in the FinTech Sector - An Industrial Study

[Context and motivation]: Understanding and interpreting regulatory norms and inferring software requirements from them is a critical step towards regulatory compliance, a matter of significant importance in various industrial sectors. [Question/ problem]: However, interpreting regulations still largely depends on individual legal expertise and experience within the respective domain, with little to no systematic methodologies and supportive tools to guide this practice. In fact, research in this area is too often detached from practitioners' experiences, rendering the proposed solutions not transferable to industrial practice. As we argue, one reason is that we still lack a profound understanding of industry- and domain-specific practices and challenges. [Principal ideas/ results]: We aim to close this gap and provide such an investigation at the example of the banking and insurance domain. We conduct an industrial multi-case study as part of a long-term academia-industry collaboration with a medium-sized software development and renovation company. We explore contemporary industrial practices and challenges when inferring requirements from regulations to support more problem-driven research. Our study investigates the complexities of requirement engineering in regulatory contexts, pinpointing various issues and discussing them in detail. We highlight the gathered insights and the practical challenges encountered and suggest avenues for future research. [Contribution]: Our contribution is a comprehensive case study focused on the FinTech domain, offering a detailed understanding of the specific needs within this sector. We have identified key practices for managing regulatory requirements in software development, and have pinpointed several challenges. We conclude by offering a set of recommendations for future problem-driven research directions.

cs.SE↗