arXiv subjects

Chenqian Le

Publications and source records attributed to Chenqian Le.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Multi-Subject Pretraining Enables Short-Calibration Personalization for Closed-Corpus Surface EMG Speech Decoding

Surface electromyography (sEMG)-based silent speech interfaces are limited by cross-user variability and calibration burden. We study a limited-data setting in which each of 27 speech-typical participants contributed less than 0.5 h of data (21.3 min on average) across Aloud and Mimed speech. Within a closed 50-sentence corpus, we used leave-one-subject-out evaluation, initializing from a released single-subject checkpoint, pretraining on non-held-out participants, and fine-tuning on the target participant. This pipeline achieved 21.7% character error rate (CER) and 31.9% word error rate (WER), compared with 49.3% CER without target-subject calibration and 68.0% CER for direct checkpoint fine-tuning. Multi-subject pretraining from random initialization followed by fine-tuning reached 44.9% CER and did not converge under the fixed schedule in 5 of 27 folds, indicating substantial optimization and accuracy benefits from checkpoint initialization. Macro-averaged CER declined from 74.4% with one pretraining participant to 21.7% with 26. Three minutes of target-subject calibration achieved 20.5% CER and 31.7% WER, with no statistically significant difference from the full approximately 13-min pool (21.7% CER and 31.9% WER). A subject-specific adapter provided no detectable benefit. Excluding the five evaluation sentences from all sEMG model-training data increased CER and WER to 78.6% and 99.9%. These results support short-calibration personalization in a standardized-montage, closed-corpus setting.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Iterative Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answering

Medical retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems typically operate on text chunks extracted from biomedical literature, discarding the rich visual content (tables, figures, structured layouts) of original document pages. We propose MED-VRAG, an iterative multimodal RAG framework that retrieves and reasons over PMC document page images instead of OCR'd text. The system pairs ColQwen2.5 patch-level page embeddings with a sharded MapReduce LLM filter, scaling to ~350K pages while keeping Stage-1 retrieval under 30 ms via an offline coarse-to-fine index (C=8 centroids per page, ANN over centroids, exact two-way scoring on the top-R shortlist). A vision-language model (VLM) then iteratively refines its query and accumulates evidence in a memory bank across up to 3 reasoning rounds, with a single iteration costing ~15.9 s and the full three-round pipeline ~47.8 s on 4xA100. Across four medical QA benchmarks (MedQA, MedMCQA, PubMedQA, MMLU-Med), MEDVRAG reaches 78.6% average accuracy. Under controlled comparison with the same Qwen2.5-VL-32B backbone, retrieval contributes a +5.8 point gain over the no-retrieval baseline; we also note a +1.8 point edge over MedRAG + GPT-4 (76.8%), with the caveat that this is a cross-paper rather than head-to-head comparison. Ablations isolate +1.0 from page-image vs text-chunk retrieval, +1.5 from iteration, and +1.0 from the memory bank.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

What Does Multi-Harness RL Learn? Credit Assignment and Portability in Coding Agents

Agent reinforcement learning (RL) increasingly runs through full execution harnesses, and a multi-harness recipe mixes two choices: exposing the policy to several harnesses, and comparing their rewards inside one relative-advantage group. We isolate the second choice in repository-level coding. From one Qwen3-8B supervised warm start we replay the same frozen task-harness records from Aider, OpenHands, Qwen Code, and SWE-agent, with the same number of updates, under two rules for group-relative policy optimization (GRPO), Within (one group per task-harness pair) and Cross (harnesses pooled within a task), and score every checkpoint with a sealed SWE-bench Verified oracle on four source harnesses and a minimal harness held out of training. The evaluation harness is the dominant variable: across 24,000 sealed evaluations it moves the mean solve rate from 2.14\% to 9.27\%, a factor of 4.3, where the training recipe moves it by 1.16. The grouping rule is not. On the held-out harness, Cross minus Within is +0.25 pp, 95\% confidence interval [-0.48, +1.02], at eight attempts per task, and +0.16 [-0.41, +0.72] pooled over three training seeds whose individual estimates change sign. Each rule's own seed range, 0.42 to 0.45 pp, exceeds the difference between them. Both rules place their largest gains on the same source harness. The pooled advantage carries the harness: an out-of-fold classifier recovers the generating harness from Cross's advantage +4.48 pp above the shuffled-label baseline and from Within's not at all, and the two rules still reach the same held-out score and action distribution inside each harness. Re-collecting half the training data on-policy does not change this. Cross-harness credit yields configuration adaptation and no more portable capability than within-harness credit. Multi-harness RL reports should state the grouping boundary and test under an unseen harness.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

CodeRescue: Budget-Calibrated Recovery Routing for Coding Agents

Coding agents increasingly operate in executable environments where a failed attempt produces actionable feedback rather than merely an incorrect answer. Existing cost-aware systems typically treat such failures as cascade decisions: try a cheap model first, then escalate hard cases to a stronger and more expensive model. In coding, however, execution feedback can also make further cheap-model recovery worthwhile, raising a budgeted deployment question: when should an agent spend more cheap compute, and when should it escalate? We formulate this post-failure decision as recovery routing over heterogeneous actions and train a supervised router from execution rollouts. To make the same router usable under changing budgets, we add a Conformal Risk Control (CRC) layer that selects a deployment-time cost penalty without retraining and provides marginal expected-cost control under exchangeability. Across held-out failures from five coding benchmarks, cheap recovery and escalation exhibit complementary success patterns. The calibrated frontier improves over fixed actions, prompt-only routers, and a binary cascade baseline; in the main GPT-5.4-nano/GPT-5.4 setting, one CRC-calibrated frontier point exceeds always-escalate solve rate while using 35% of its mean recovery cost. Code is available at https://github.com/Qijia-He/agent-budget-control.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Why Does Grounding Hurt Medical VQA? Benchmarking, Diagnosis, and Fine-Tuning of Vision-Language Models

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to medical visual question answering (Med-VQA), yet whether they can \emph{localize} the evidence behind their answers---a prerequisite for clinical auditability---is poorly characterized. We separately evaluate VQA reasoning and visual grounding for four recent frontier VLMs (GPT-5.1, GPT-5.5, Gemini-2.5-Pro, Gemini-3-Flash), two domain-specific medical VLMs (Lingshu, MedGemma), and a dedicated open-vocabulary detector (Grounding DINO) on VQA-RAD and SLAKE. Two findings challenge the intuition that ``add grounding to improve VQA.'' First, \textbf{no model localizes medical targets well}: every off-the-shelf system---frontier, medical-specialized, or dedicated detector---scores mean IoU 0.05--0.24 on our SLAKE grounding split, at or barely above a trivial center-box baseline (0.10), with Acc@0.5 below 20\%. Second, and counter to the common ``localize-then-answer'' paradigm, \textbf{cropping to a bounding box degrades VQA even when the box is a perfect oracle}: on the matched subset where oracle ground-truth boxes are applied, GT-grounding \emph{lowers} closed-ended accuracy for every model (by 0.9--18.0 points versus using the full image)---consistent with the crop discarding global context the model relies on. Because the oracle box removes localization error by construction, the problem is not that perception is a recoverable bottleneck, but that grounding-by-cropping is itself the wrong interface. Finally, we show constructively that the two channels need not conflict: supervised fine-tuning of Qwen-2.5-VL-7B on answers \emph{alone} silently destroys box-evidence emission (0/418 parseable boxes), whereas mixing in a small amount of grounding supervision restores localization to 0.36 IoU---above every zero-shot model---while preserving answer accuracy.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

PreDiff-LM: Pretrained Discrete Masked Diffusion Language Modeling with Hybrid Attention

Discrete masked diffusion language models support bidirectional generation and infilling, but adapting pretrained autoregressive (AR) transformers requires reconciling causal pretraining with bidirectional denoising. We study this problem at the level of attention rather than claiming AR-weight reuse itself as novel. PreDiff-LM preserves causal attention within the observed prompt while allowing full bidirectional attention within the masked target. Under a matched GPT-2 Medium, WikiText-103, 90K-step setup, this hybrid mask improves unconditional perplexity from 34.1 to 28.7 and MAUVE from 0.71 to 0.78 over uniform bidirectional attention with the same AR initialization. Attention adaptation also composes with a DiffuGPT-style objective adaptation, reaching 26.9 perplexity. Pretrained initialization reduces the steps required to reach perplexity below 50 from about 350K to 8K, although a compute-matched fine-tuned AR model remains stronger at equal scale (18.9 versus 28.7). Beyond perplexity, PreDiff-LM improves repetition, distributional quality, four zero-shot downstream tasks, and human preference over prior diffusion baselines. The results position hybrid attention as a complementary mechanism for adapting pretrained causal backbones, while making explicit the remaining quality and inference-efficiency gaps to optimized AR models.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Less Data, Better Alignment: Data-Centric Multi-Evaluator Agreement for Preference Optimization

Research on preference optimization often varies the training objective while holding the data fixed. We instead ask whether a small, high-confidence set of on-policy responses can provide a reliable learning signal. Our method, DMAPO (Data-centric Multi-evaluator Agreement for Preference Optimization), generates candidate responses from the target policy, evaluates helpfulness, factuality, and conciseness with rubric-specialized evaluators, applies a process-critic correction, and retains only high-consensus desirable or undesirable examples. This procedure accepts 1,871 of 54,236 Mistral-7B candidates (3.45%). KTO trained on this set reaches 7.50 on MT-Bench, 95.5% length-controlled win rate against a text-davinci-003 reference, and 57.3% IFEval prompt accuracy. Independent pairwise evaluation also favors DMAPO over SimPO: GPT-4o yields a net win rate of 23.3 points on 129 held-out prompts and 24.0 points on 200 out-of-distribution LMSYS-Chat prompts; Claude Opus 4.7 yields 24.1 points on the held-out set. Changing the evaluator model or rubric alters the selected examples but has little effect on downstream performance. A second-backbone study yields a similar 3.41% acceptance rate, although its performance gains are more modest. Across these experiments, consensus filtering offers a data-efficient route to preference optimization for general instructions, at the cost of additional curation compute and dependence on evaluator judgments.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

VehAnchor: Metadata-Free Metric Scale Recovery from Vehicle Cues in Aerial Imagery

Autonomous aerial robots operating in GPS-denied or communication-degraded environments frequently lose access to camera metadata and telemetry, leaving onboard perception systems unable to recover the absolute metric scale of the scene. As LLM/VLM-based planners are increasingly adopted as high-level agents for embodied systems, their ability to reason about physical dimensions becomes safety-critical -- yet our experiments show that five state-of-the-art VLMs suffer from \emph{spatial scale hallucinations}, with median area estimation errors exceeding 50\%. We propose VehAnchor, a lightweight, deterministic \emph{Geometric Perception Skill} designed as a callable tool that any LLM-based agent can invoke to recover Ground Sample Distance (GSD) from ubiquitous environmental anchors: small vehicles detected via oriented bounding boxes, whose modal pixel length is robustly estimated through kernel density estimation and converted to GSD using a pre-calibrated reference length. The tool returns both a GSD estimate and a composite confidence score, enabling the calling agent to autonomously decide whether to trust the measurement or fall back to alternative strategies. On the DOTA~v1.5 benchmark, VehAnchor achieves 6.87\% median GSD error on 306~images. Integrated with SAM-based segmentation for downstream area measurement, the pipeline yields 19.7\% median error on a 100-entry benchmark -- with 2.6$\times$ lower category dependence and 4$\times$ fewer catastrophic failures than the best VLM baseline -- demonstrating that equipping agents with deterministic geometric tools is essential for safe autonomous spatial reasoning.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Comparison of sEMG Encoding Accuracy Across Speech Modes Using Articulatory and Phoneme Features

We test whether Speech Articulatory Coding (SPARC) features can linearly predict surface electromyography (sEMG) envelopes across aloud, mimed, and subvocal speech in twenty-four subjects. Using elastic-net multivariate temporal response function (mTRF) with sentence-level cross-validation, SPARC yields higher prediction accuracy than phoneme one-hot representations on nearly all electrodes and in all speech modes. Aloud and mimed speech perform comparably, and subvocal speech remains above chance, indicating detectable articulatory activity. Variance partitioning shows a substantial unique contribution from SPARC and a minimal unique contribution from phoneme features. mTRF weight patterns reveal anatomically interpretable relationships between electrode sites and articulatory movements that remain consistent across modes. This study focuses on representation/encoding analysis (not end-to-end decoding) and supports SPARC as a robust and interpretable intermediate target for sEMG-based silent-speech modeling.

cs.SD↗

arXiv2025

VoxelFormer: Parameter-Efficient Multi-Subject Visual Decoding from fMRI

Recent advances in fMRI-based visual decoding have enabled compelling reconstructions of perceived images. However, most approaches rely on subject-specific training, limiting scalability and practical deployment. We introduce \textbf{VoxelFormer}, a lightweight transformer architecture that enables multi-subject training for visual decoding from fMRI. VoxelFormer integrates a Token Merging Transformer (ToMer) for efficient voxel compression and a query-driven Q-Former that produces fixed-size neural representations aligned with the CLIP image embedding space. Evaluated on the 7T Natural Scenes Dataset, VoxelFormer achieves competitive retrieval performance on subjects included during training with significantly fewer parameters than existing methods. These results highlight token merging and query-based transformers as promising strategies for parameter-efficient neural decoding.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2025

Instruction Tuning and CoT Prompting for Contextual Medical QA with LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in medical question answering (MedQA), yet adapting them to biomedical reasoning remains challenging due to domain-specific complexity and limited supervision. In this work, we study how prompt design and lightweight fine-tuning affect the performance of open-source LLMs on PubMedQA, a benchmark for multiple-choice biomedical questions. We focus on two widely used prompting strategies - standard instruction prompts and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompts - and apply QLoRA for parameter-efficient instruction tuning. Across multiple model families and sizes, our experiments show that CoT prompting alone can improve reasoning in zero-shot settings, while instruction tuning significantly boosts accuracy. However, fine-tuning on CoT prompts does not universally enhance performance and may even degrade it for certain larger models. These findings suggest that reasoning-aware prompts are useful, but their benefits are model- and scale-dependent. Our study offers practical insights into combining prompt engineering with efficient finetuning for medical QA applications.

cs.CL↗