arXiv subjects

Chao Li

Publications and source records attributed to Chao Li.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Lightweight Adaptation of General-Purpose VLMs for Multispectral and SAR Image Understanding

General-purpose vision-language models (VLMs) now support strong visual recognition, instruction following, and generation. However, most pretrained visual encoders are built around three-channel natural images and do not directly accommodate observations such as native multispectral measurements or synthetic aperture radar (SAR). Adapting VLMs to these sensors typically requires dedicated encoders and domain pretraining, slowing the reuse of stronger general-purpose checkpoints. We show that the multi-image interface of general-purpose VLMs offers a lightweight alternative. Our protocol renders each observation as five optical views and one SAR view, names them in the prompt, and adapts the language network and selected visual transformer blocks with LoRA. This exposes band composites, spectral indices, and radar backscatter through an existing visual interface. For land-cover recognition, structured supervision couples predicted classes with sensor evidence. We further construct preference pairs in which a true label is omitted while its supporting evidence is retained, encouraging complete predictions that remain consistent with the observations. On a balanced six-class land-cover benchmark derived from BigEarthNet-v2, the adapted Qwen3-VL reaches 0.8275 micro F1. The same input and adaptation protocol improves all four tested VLM architectures and transfers to Sen1Floods11 flood verification and BigEarthNet.txt captioning. Image removal and mismatch controls show that the adapted models use the supplied sensor observations. Together, these results demonstrate that VLMs can be repurposed for multispectral and SAR tasks through rendered inputs and compact LoRA adaptation, without training a new foundation model.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

EmbodiedSkills: A Unified Framework for Orchestrating, Training, and Deploying VLA Agents

Vision-language-action (VLA) models map visual observations and language instructions directly to robot actions, but long-horizon tasks require more than action prediction. An agent must coordinate perception, planning, execution, progress verification, and recovery as the physical state evolves. An action prediction or a model-generated skill decision does not, by itself, guarantee that the proposed operation is valid in the current state or that its outcome will be verified. We propose EmbodiedSkills, a unified framework that treats each skill decision as an execution proposal: the runtime checks its prerequisites before execution and verifies the outcome afterward. A shared executable-skill interface connects high-level skill selection, bounded low-level VLA execution, and post-action verification within a single agent loop. Because this interface remains fixed, low-level VLA policies can be replaced or adapted without changing the agent loop. The interface also records planning, execution, verification, and recovery events as structured trajectories, which provide supervision for individual components and can support optional online adaptation when interactive feedback is available. We instantiate EmbodiedSkills with Qwen3-VL and OpenPI/pi0.5 on RoboTwin 2.0 and LIBERO. Task-adapted low-level VLA policies achieve an average success rate of 86.20% across 50 RoboTwin 2.0 tasks and 97.40% across the four LIBERO suites. These results establish the execution performance of the task-adapted low-level VLA policies used in EmbodiedSkills. On four memory-dependent RMBench tasks, the same task-adapted execution approach achieves 12.5% average success. The framework provides a trainable and inspectable agent layer for turning these policies into closed-loop embodied systems.

cs.RO↗

arXiv2026

Why Organizational Rules Fail AI: O-I-B-A-R and the Externalization of Decision Boundaries

AI systems increasingly enter organizations through policies, procedures, playbooks, prompts, and other explicit representations of work. Yet formal descriptions often differ from situated practice, and captured know-what can omit the contextual know-how experts use when judgments are uncertain. We argue that a recurring class of organizational AI failures arises partly from a knowledge representation problem at the sociotechnical interface: the AI receives the procedure, while the organization operates on the procedure plus negative boundaries, runtime judgments, responsibility assignments, and learning history. We introduce O-I-B-A-R (OPEN, IS, BUT, ACTION, RESULT), a scaffold for externalizing these missing decision boundaries. IS records when a judgment holds. BUT records a concrete failure containing information beyond the logical negation of IS. Comparable success and failure cases are decomposed toward a minimally sufficient changing variable, which becomes a value-bearing decision dimension. A suspension represents the state in which the dimension is known but its current value is unresolved, specifying what must be measured, asked, retrieved, or escalated to a human. RESULT confirms a boundary, shifts a threshold, or exposes a new dimension. Incidents can generate new dimensions, unresolved values can define human-AI handoffs, and feedback can expand the decision space. We also identify a sociotechnical tension: durable and attributable failure histories can suppress the candor on which useful boundary knowledge depends. Externalization must therefore be designed as an organizational intervention with real costs and incentives.

cs.CY↗